Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry

Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Alex Horton, Martin Ewart, Noel Gourmelen, Xavier Fettweis, Amos Storkey
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/24/6210/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/24/6210/ 2023-08-20T04:06:53+02:00 Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry Alex Horton Martin Ewart Noel Gourmelen Xavier Fettweis Amos Storkey agris 2022-12-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute AI Remote Sensing https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 24; Pages: 6210 SARIn interferometry CryoSat swath ICESat-2 IceBridge artificial intelligence (AI) Greenland cryosphere altimetry Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210 2023-08-01T07:42:09Z Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satellite missions, the science community has access to unprecedented and ever-increasing data. Combining elevation datasets allows potentially greater spatial-temporal coverage and improved accuracy; however, combining data from different sensor types and acquisition modes is difficult by differences in intrinsic sensor properties and processing methods. This study focuses on the combination of elevation measurements derived from ICESat-2 and Operation IceBridge LIDAR instruments and from CryoSat-2’s novel interferometric radar altimeter over Greenland. We develop a deep neural network based on sub-waveform information from CryoSat-2, elevation differences between radar and LIDAR, and additional inputs representing local geophysical information. A time series of maps are created showing observed LIDAR-radar differences and neural network model predictions. Mean LIDAR vs. interferometric radar adjustments and the broad spatial and temporal trends thereof are recreated by the neural network. The neural network also predicts radar-LIDAR differences with respect to waveform parameters better than a simple linear model; however, point level adjustments and the magnitudes of the spatial and temporal trends are underestimated. Text Greenland MDPI Open Access Publishing Greenland Remote Sensing 14 24 6210
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
artificial intelligence (AI)
Greenland
cryosphere
altimetry
spellingShingle SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
artificial intelligence (AI)
Greenland
cryosphere
altimetry
Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
topic_facet SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
artificial intelligence (AI)
Greenland
cryosphere
altimetry
description Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satellite missions, the science community has access to unprecedented and ever-increasing data. Combining elevation datasets allows potentially greater spatial-temporal coverage and improved accuracy; however, combining data from different sensor types and acquisition modes is difficult by differences in intrinsic sensor properties and processing methods. This study focuses on the combination of elevation measurements derived from ICESat-2 and Operation IceBridge LIDAR instruments and from CryoSat-2’s novel interferometric radar altimeter over Greenland. We develop a deep neural network based on sub-waveform information from CryoSat-2, elevation differences between radar and LIDAR, and additional inputs representing local geophysical information. A time series of maps are created showing observed LIDAR-radar differences and neural network model predictions. Mean LIDAR vs. interferometric radar adjustments and the broad spatial and temporal trends thereof are recreated by the neural network. The neural network also predicts radar-LIDAR differences with respect to waveform parameters better than a simple linear model; however, point level adjustments and the magnitudes of the spatial and temporal trends are underestimated.
format Text
author Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
author_facet Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
author_sort Alex Horton
title Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_short Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_full Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_fullStr Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_full_unstemmed Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_sort using deep learning to model elevation differences between radar and laser altimetry
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
op_coverage agris
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 24; Pages: 6210
op_relation AI Remote Sensing
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 14
container_issue 24
container_start_page 6210
_version_ 1774718244564762624