Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model

Hourly and 15 min GOES-16 and -17 atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) are evaluated using the 2020 version of the operational HWRF to assess their impact on tropical cyclone forecasting. The evaluation includes infrared (IR), visible (VIS), shortwave (SWIR), clear air, and cloud top water vapor (CAWV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Agnes H. N. Lim, Sharon E. Nebuda, James A. Jung, Jaime M. Daniels, Andrew Bailey, Wayne Bresky, Li Bi, Avichal Mehra
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/13/3068/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/13/3068/ 2023-08-20T04:08:25+02:00 Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model Agnes H. N. Lim Sharon E. Nebuda James A. Jung Jaime M. Daniels Andrew Bailey Wayne Bresky Li Bi Avichal Mehra agris 2022-06-26 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 13; Pages: 3068 data assimilation atmospheric motion vectors HWRF GOES-16 and 17 tropical cyclone forecasting Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068 2023-08-01T05:30:20Z Hourly and 15 min GOES-16 and -17 atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) are evaluated using the 2020 version of the operational HWRF to assess their impact on tropical cyclone forecasting. The evaluation includes infrared (IR), visible (VIS), shortwave (SWIR), clear air, and cloud top water vapor (CAWV and CTWV) AMVs derived from the ABI imagery. Several changes are made to optimize the assimilation of these winds. The observational error profile is inflated to avoid overweighting of the AMVs. The range of allowable AMV wind speeds entering the assimilation system is increased to include larger wind speeds observed in tropical cyclones. Two data quality checks, commonly used for rejecting AMVs, namely QI and PCT1, have been removed. These changes resulted in a 20–40% increase in the number of AMVs assimilated. One additional change, specific to infrared AMVs, is narrowing the atmospheric layer where IR AMVs are rejected from 400–800 hPa to 400–600 hPa. The AMVs’ impact on forecast skill is assessed using storms from the North Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific, respectively. Overall, GOES-16 and -17 AMVs are beneficial for improving tropical cyclone forecasting. Positive analysis and forecast impact are obtained for track error, intensity error, minimum central pressure error, and storm size. Text North Atlantic MDPI Open Access Publishing Pacific Remote Sensing 14 13 3068
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic data assimilation
atmospheric motion vectors
HWRF
GOES-16 and 17
tropical cyclone forecasting
spellingShingle data assimilation
atmospheric motion vectors
HWRF
GOES-16 and 17
tropical cyclone forecasting
Agnes H. N. Lim
Sharon E. Nebuda
James A. Jung
Jaime M. Daniels
Andrew Bailey
Wayne Bresky
Li Bi
Avichal Mehra
Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
topic_facet data assimilation
atmospheric motion vectors
HWRF
GOES-16 and 17
tropical cyclone forecasting
description Hourly and 15 min GOES-16 and -17 atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) are evaluated using the 2020 version of the operational HWRF to assess their impact on tropical cyclone forecasting. The evaluation includes infrared (IR), visible (VIS), shortwave (SWIR), clear air, and cloud top water vapor (CAWV and CTWV) AMVs derived from the ABI imagery. Several changes are made to optimize the assimilation of these winds. The observational error profile is inflated to avoid overweighting of the AMVs. The range of allowable AMV wind speeds entering the assimilation system is increased to include larger wind speeds observed in tropical cyclones. Two data quality checks, commonly used for rejecting AMVs, namely QI and PCT1, have been removed. These changes resulted in a 20–40% increase in the number of AMVs assimilated. One additional change, specific to infrared AMVs, is narrowing the atmospheric layer where IR AMVs are rejected from 400–800 hPa to 400–600 hPa. The AMVs’ impact on forecast skill is assessed using storms from the North Atlantic and the Eastern Pacific, respectively. Overall, GOES-16 and -17 AMVs are beneficial for improving tropical cyclone forecasting. Positive analysis and forecast impact are obtained for track error, intensity error, minimum central pressure error, and storm size.
format Text
author Agnes H. N. Lim
Sharon E. Nebuda
James A. Jung
Jaime M. Daniels
Andrew Bailey
Wayne Bresky
Li Bi
Avichal Mehra
author_facet Agnes H. N. Lim
Sharon E. Nebuda
James A. Jung
Jaime M. Daniels
Andrew Bailey
Wayne Bresky
Li Bi
Avichal Mehra
author_sort Agnes H. N. Lim
title Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
title_short Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
title_full Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
title_fullStr Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the Assimilation of the GOES-16/-17 Atmospheric Motion Vectors in the Hurricane Weather Forecasting (HWRF) Model
title_sort optimizing the assimilation of the goes-16/-17 atmospheric motion vectors in the hurricane weather forecasting (hwrf) model
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068
op_coverage agris
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 13; Pages: 3068
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14133068
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 14
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3068
_version_ 1774720661195849728