The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review

Climate warming has become indisputable, and it is now crucial to increase our understanding of both the mechanisms and consequences of climate change. The Antarctic region is subjected to substantial changes, the trends of which have been recognized for several decades. In the South Shetland Island...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Michał Dziembowski, Robert Józef Bialik
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/12/2736/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/14/12/2736/ 2023-08-20T04:00:22+02:00 The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review Michał Dziembowski Robert Józef Bialik agris 2022-06-07 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 12; Pages: 2736 glacier icefield snow cryosphere mass balance modelling South Shetland Islands King George Island field measurements ground-penetrating radar Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736 2023-08-01T05:18:16Z Climate warming has become indisputable, and it is now crucial to increase our understanding of both the mechanisms and consequences of climate change. The Antarctic region is subjected to substantial changes, the trends of which have been recognized for several decades. In the South Shetland Islands, the most visible effect of climate change is progressive deglaciation. The following review focuses on past glaciological studies conducted on King George Island (KGI). The results of collected cryosphere element observations are discussed herein in a comprehensive manner. Our analysis showed that there is a lack of temporal as well as spatial continuity for studies on the basic mass balance parameters on the entire KGI ice dome and only Bellingshausen Dome has a relatively long history of data collection. The methodologies of past work, which have improved over time, are also discussed. When studying the glacier front fluctuations, the authors most frequently use a 1956 aerial photography as reference ice coverage. This was the case for seven papers, while other sources are seldomly mentioned. In other papers as many as 41 other sources were used, and therefore comparison to photos taken up to 60 years later can give misleading trends, as small glaciers may have both advanced and retreated in that time. In the case of glacial velocities there is also an apparent lack of consistency, as different glaciers were indicated as the fastest on KGI. Only Lange, Anna, Crystal, Eldred, and eastern part of Usher glaciers were determined by more than one author as the fastest. Additionally, there are gaps in the KGI Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey area, which includes three ice domes: the Warszawa Icefield, the Krakow Icefield, and eastern part of King George Island. Ideas for further work on the topic are also suggested, allowing for easier access to data and thus contributing to a better understanding of glacier development mechanisms. Text Antarc* Antarctic King George Island South Shetland Islands MDPI Open Access Publishing Antarctic The Antarctic King George Island South Shetland Islands Warszawa Icefield ENVELOPE(-58.558,-58.558,-62.203,-62.203) Bellingshausen Dome ENVELOPE(-58.888,-58.888,-62.165,-62.165) Krakow Icefield ENVELOPE(-58.274,-58.274,-62.138,-62.138) Remote Sensing 14 12 2736
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic glacier
icefield
snow
cryosphere
mass balance
modelling
South Shetland Islands
King George Island
field measurements
ground-penetrating radar
spellingShingle glacier
icefield
snow
cryosphere
mass balance
modelling
South Shetland Islands
King George Island
field measurements
ground-penetrating radar
Michał Dziembowski
Robert Józef Bialik
The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
topic_facet glacier
icefield
snow
cryosphere
mass balance
modelling
South Shetland Islands
King George Island
field measurements
ground-penetrating radar
description Climate warming has become indisputable, and it is now crucial to increase our understanding of both the mechanisms and consequences of climate change. The Antarctic region is subjected to substantial changes, the trends of which have been recognized for several decades. In the South Shetland Islands, the most visible effect of climate change is progressive deglaciation. The following review focuses on past glaciological studies conducted on King George Island (KGI). The results of collected cryosphere element observations are discussed herein in a comprehensive manner. Our analysis showed that there is a lack of temporal as well as spatial continuity for studies on the basic mass balance parameters on the entire KGI ice dome and only Bellingshausen Dome has a relatively long history of data collection. The methodologies of past work, which have improved over time, are also discussed. When studying the glacier front fluctuations, the authors most frequently use a 1956 aerial photography as reference ice coverage. This was the case for seven papers, while other sources are seldomly mentioned. In other papers as many as 41 other sources were used, and therefore comparison to photos taken up to 60 years later can give misleading trends, as small glaciers may have both advanced and retreated in that time. In the case of glacial velocities there is also an apparent lack of consistency, as different glaciers were indicated as the fastest on KGI. Only Lange, Anna, Crystal, Eldred, and eastern part of Usher glaciers were determined by more than one author as the fastest. Additionally, there are gaps in the KGI Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey area, which includes three ice domes: the Warszawa Icefield, the Krakow Icefield, and eastern part of King George Island. Ideas for further work on the topic are also suggested, allowing for easier access to data and thus contributing to a better understanding of glacier development mechanisms.
format Text
author Michał Dziembowski
Robert Józef Bialik
author_facet Michał Dziembowski
Robert Józef Bialik
author_sort Michał Dziembowski
title The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
title_short The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
title_full The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
title_fullStr The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
title_full_unstemmed The Remotely and Directly Obtained Results of Glaciological Studies on King George Island: A Review
title_sort remotely and directly obtained results of glaciological studies on king george island: a review
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736
op_coverage agris
long_lat ENVELOPE(-58.558,-58.558,-62.203,-62.203)
ENVELOPE(-58.888,-58.888,-62.165,-62.165)
ENVELOPE(-58.274,-58.274,-62.138,-62.138)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
King George Island
South Shetland Islands
Warszawa Icefield
Bellingshausen Dome
Krakow Icefield
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
King George Island
South Shetland Islands
Warszawa Icefield
Bellingshausen Dome
Krakow Icefield
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
King George Island
South Shetland Islands
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
King George Island
South Shetland Islands
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 14; Issue 12; Pages: 2736
op_relation Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122736
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 14
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2736
_version_ 1774717787017576448