Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods

It has become increasingly difficult in recent years to predict precipitation scientifically and accurately due to the dual effects of human activities and climatic conditions. This paper focuses on four aspects to improve precipitation prediction accuracy. Five decomposition methods (time-varying f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Chao Song, Xiaohong Chen
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/13/5/1018/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/13/5/1018/ 2023-08-20T04:08:27+02:00 Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods Chao Song Xiaohong Chen agris 2021-03-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Atmospheric Remote Sensing https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 13; Issue 5; Pages: 1018 decomposition methods Elman neural network difference precipitation prediction Guangzhou Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018 2023-08-01T01:13:48Z It has become increasingly difficult in recent years to predict precipitation scientifically and accurately due to the dual effects of human activities and climatic conditions. This paper focuses on four aspects to improve precipitation prediction accuracy. Five decomposition methods (time-varying filter-based empirical mode decomposition (TVF-EMD), robust empirical mode decomposition (REMD), complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD), wavelet transform (WT), and extreme-point symmetric mode decomposition (ESMD) combined with the Elman neural network (ENN)) are used to construct five prediction models, i.e., TVF-EMD-ENN, REMD-ENN, CEEMD-ENN, WT-ENN, and ESMD-ENN. The variance contribution rate (VCR) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) are utilized to compare the performances of the five decomposition methods. The wavelet transform coherence (WTC) is used to determine the reason for the poor prediction performance of machine learning algorithms in individual years and the relationship with climate indicators. A secondary decomposition of the TVF-EMD is used to improve the prediction accuracy of the models. The proposed methods are used to predict the annual precipitation in Guangzhou. The subcomponents obtained from the TVF-EMD are the most stable among the four decomposition methods, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, the Nino 3.4 index, and sunspots have a smaller influence on the first subcomponent (Sc-1) than the other subcomponents. The TVF-EMD-ENN model has the best prediction performance and outperforms traditional machine learning models. The secondary decomposition of the Sc-1 of the TVF-EMD model significantly improves the prediction accuracy. Text North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation MDPI Open Access Publishing Remote Sensing 13 5 1018
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic decomposition methods
Elman neural network
difference
precipitation prediction
Guangzhou
spellingShingle decomposition methods
Elman neural network
difference
precipitation prediction
Guangzhou
Chao Song
Xiaohong Chen
Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
topic_facet decomposition methods
Elman neural network
difference
precipitation prediction
Guangzhou
description It has become increasingly difficult in recent years to predict precipitation scientifically and accurately due to the dual effects of human activities and climatic conditions. This paper focuses on four aspects to improve precipitation prediction accuracy. Five decomposition methods (time-varying filter-based empirical mode decomposition (TVF-EMD), robust empirical mode decomposition (REMD), complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD), wavelet transform (WT), and extreme-point symmetric mode decomposition (ESMD) combined with the Elman neural network (ENN)) are used to construct five prediction models, i.e., TVF-EMD-ENN, REMD-ENN, CEEMD-ENN, WT-ENN, and ESMD-ENN. The variance contribution rate (VCR) and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) are utilized to compare the performances of the five decomposition methods. The wavelet transform coherence (WTC) is used to determine the reason for the poor prediction performance of machine learning algorithms in individual years and the relationship with climate indicators. A secondary decomposition of the TVF-EMD is used to improve the prediction accuracy of the models. The proposed methods are used to predict the annual precipitation in Guangzhou. The subcomponents obtained from the TVF-EMD are the most stable among the four decomposition methods, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, the Nino 3.4 index, and sunspots have a smaller influence on the first subcomponent (Sc-1) than the other subcomponents. The TVF-EMD-ENN model has the best prediction performance and outperforms traditional machine learning models. The secondary decomposition of the Sc-1 of the TVF-EMD model significantly improves the prediction accuracy.
format Text
author Chao Song
Xiaohong Chen
author_facet Chao Song
Xiaohong Chen
author_sort Chao Song
title Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
title_short Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
title_full Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
title_fullStr Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
title_full_unstemmed Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
title_sort performance comparison of machine learning models for annual precipitation prediction using different decomposition methods
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018
op_coverage agris
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 13; Issue 5; Pages: 1018
op_relation Atmospheric Remote Sensing
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13051018
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 13
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1018
_version_ 1774720729357484032