Evaluation of LIRIC Algorithm Performance Using Independent Sun-Sky Photometer Data at Two Altitude Levels

• Published in: Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: María J. Granados-Muñoz, José Antonio Benavent-Oltra, Daniel Pérez-Ramírez, Hassan Lyamani, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Francisco Navas-Guzmán, Antonio Valenzuela, Francisco José Olmo, Lucas Alados-Arboledas
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
• Subjects: LIRIC; aerosol microphysical properties; lidar; sun-sky photometer; Aerosol Robotic Network
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050842

This work evaluates the Lidar-Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC) using sun-sky photometers located at different altitudes in the same atmospheric column. Measurements were acquired during an intensive observational period in summer 2012 at Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network (ACTRIS)/Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Granada (GRA; 37.16°N, 3.61°W, 680 m above sea level (a.s.l.)) and Cerro Poyos (CP; 37.11°N, 3.49°W, 1820 m a.s.l.) sites. Both stations operated AERONET sun-photometry, with an additional lidar system operating at Granada station. The extended database of simultaneous lidar and sun-photometry measurements from this study allowed the statistical analysis of vertically resolved microphysical properties retrieved with LIRIC, with 70% of the analyzed cases corresponding to mineral dust. Consequently, volume concentration values were 46 μm3/cm3 on average, with a value of ~30 μm3/cm3 corresponding to the coarse spheroid mode and concentrations below 10 μm3/cm3 for the fine and coarse spherical modes. According to the microphysical properties’ profiles, aerosol particles reached altitudes up to 6000 m a.s.l., as observed in previous studies over the same region. Results obtained from comparing the LIRIC retrievals from GRA and from CP revealed good agreement between both stations with differences within the expected uncertainties associated with LIRIC (15%). However, larger discrepancies were found for 10% of the cases, mostly due to the incomplete overlap of the lidar signal and/or to the influence of different aerosol layers advected from the local origin located between both stations, which is particularly important in cases of low aerosol loads. Nevertheless, the results presented here demonstrate the robustness and self-consistency of LIRIC and consequently its applicability to large databases such as those derived from ACTRIS-European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) observations.