Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences

Detailed analysis of five gas emission craters (GEC) found in the north of West Siberia is presented. Remote sensing data used in the study is verified by field surveys. Previous studies show that all of the GECs were preceded by mounds 2 to 6 m high and 20 to 55 m in diameter. GECs initially were 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Alexander Kizyakov, Marina Leibman, Mikhail Zimin, Anton Sonyushkin, Yury Dvornikov, Artem Khomutov, Damien Dhont, Eric Cauquil, Vladimir Pushkarev, Yulia Stanilovskaya
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/12/14/2182/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/12/14/2182/ 2023-08-20T04:10:14+02:00 Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences Alexander Kizyakov Marina Leibman Mikhail Zimin Anton Sonyushkin Yury Dvornikov Artem Khomutov Damien Dhont Eric Cauquil Vladimir Pushkarev Yulia Stanilovskaya agris 2020-07-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 12; Issue 14; Pages: 2182 gas emission crater mound-predecessor digital surface model multi-temporal remote sensing data field data Text 2020 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182 2023-07-31T23:44:48Z Detailed analysis of five gas emission craters (GEC) found in the north of West Siberia is presented. Remote sensing data used in the study is verified by field surveys. Previous studies show that all of the GECs were preceded by mounds 2 to 6 m high and 20 to 55 m in diameter. GECs initially were 20–25 m in diameter, which increased in the first years of their existence. GECs are found in various environmental (shrublands or moss-grass tundra) and geomorphic (river valley, terrace, slopes) conditions. The objective of the paper is to identify common and differing geomorphologic and environmental characteristics of all the five GEC, and their mound-predecessors. The study is based on a compilation of DSMs before and after the GEC formation using very high-resolution satellite imagery stereo pairs compared to ArcticDEM project data. Diversity of terrain and environmental settings along with rather a narrow range of GEC and mound-predecessor morphometric parameters allows concluding that the mechanism of GEC formation is most likely similar for all the GEC and is controlled rather by internal geologic and cryolithologic structure than by any surface properties. Text Tundra Siberia MDPI Open Access Publishing Remote Sensing 12 14 2182
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic gas emission crater
mound-predecessor
digital surface model
multi-temporal remote sensing data
field data
spellingShingle gas emission crater
mound-predecessor
digital surface model
multi-temporal remote sensing data
field data
Alexander Kizyakov
Marina Leibman
Mikhail Zimin
Anton Sonyushkin
Yury Dvornikov
Artem Khomutov
Damien Dhont
Eric Cauquil
Vladimir Pushkarev
Yulia Stanilovskaya
Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
topic_facet gas emission crater
mound-predecessor
digital surface model
multi-temporal remote sensing data
field data
description Detailed analysis of five gas emission craters (GEC) found in the north of West Siberia is presented. Remote sensing data used in the study is verified by field surveys. Previous studies show that all of the GECs were preceded by mounds 2 to 6 m high and 20 to 55 m in diameter. GECs initially were 20–25 m in diameter, which increased in the first years of their existence. GECs are found in various environmental (shrublands or moss-grass tundra) and geomorphic (river valley, terrace, slopes) conditions. The objective of the paper is to identify common and differing geomorphologic and environmental characteristics of all the five GEC, and their mound-predecessors. The study is based on a compilation of DSMs before and after the GEC formation using very high-resolution satellite imagery stereo pairs compared to ArcticDEM project data. Diversity of terrain and environmental settings along with rather a narrow range of GEC and mound-predecessor morphometric parameters allows concluding that the mechanism of GEC formation is most likely similar for all the GEC and is controlled rather by internal geologic and cryolithologic structure than by any surface properties.
format Text
author Alexander Kizyakov
Marina Leibman
Mikhail Zimin
Anton Sonyushkin
Yury Dvornikov
Artem Khomutov
Damien Dhont
Eric Cauquil
Vladimir Pushkarev
Yulia Stanilovskaya
author_facet Alexander Kizyakov
Marina Leibman
Mikhail Zimin
Anton Sonyushkin
Yury Dvornikov
Artem Khomutov
Damien Dhont
Eric Cauquil
Vladimir Pushkarev
Yulia Stanilovskaya
author_sort Alexander Kizyakov
title Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
title_short Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
title_full Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
title_fullStr Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
title_full_unstemmed Gas Emission Craters and Mound-Predecessors in the North of West Siberia, Similarities and Differences
title_sort gas emission craters and mound-predecessors in the north of west siberia, similarities and differences
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182
op_coverage agris
genre Tundra
Siberia
genre_facet Tundra
Siberia
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 12; Issue 14; Pages: 2182
op_relation Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142182
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 12
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2182
_version_ 1774724276631371776