Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements

The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy Syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Author: Michaël Sicard
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/11/18/2168/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2072-4292/11/18/2168/ 2023-08-20T03:59:11+02:00 Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements Michaël Sicard 2019-09-18 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Atmosphere Remote Sensing https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Remote Sensing; Volume 11; Issue 18; Pages: 2168 Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes AERONET CERES flux comparison Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168 2023-07-31T22:37:06Z The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm−2) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm−2 (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (>0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (>0.2). Text Aerosol Robotic Network MDPI Open Access Publishing Remote Sensing 11 18 2168
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
spellingShingle Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
Michaël Sicard
Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
topic_facet Top-Of-the-Atmosphere (TOA) upward solar fluxes
AERONET
CERES
flux comparison
description The AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) global network provides estimations of broadband solar radiative fluxes at the surface and at the TOA (Top-Of-the-Atmosphere). This paper reports on the validation of AERONET flux estimations at the TOA with the CERES (Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument. The validation was made at eight AERONET sites worldwide with at least seven years of Level 2.0 and Version 3 data and representatives of mineral dust, biomass burning, background continental, and urban-industrial aerosol regimes. To co-locate in time and space the AERONET and CERES fluxes, several criteria based on time and distance differences and cloud coverage were defined. When the strictest criterion was applied to all sites, the linear relationship between the observed and estimated fluxes (y = 1.04x – 3.67 Wm−2) was very close to the 1:1 ideal line. The correlation coefficient was 0.96 and nearly all points were contained in the ±15% region around the 1:1 line. The average flux difference was –2.52 Wm−2 (–0.84% in relative terms). AERONET overestimations were observed at two sites and were correlated with large aerosol optical depth (AOD) (>0.2) Underestimations were observed at one desert site and were correlated with large surface albedos (>0.2).
format Text
author Michaël Sicard
author_facet Michaël Sicard
author_sort Michaël Sicard
title Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_short Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_fullStr Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Validation of AERONET-Estimated Upward Broadband Solar Fluxes at the Top-Of-The-Atmosphere with CERES Measurements
title_sort validation of aeronet-estimated upward broadband solar fluxes at the top-of-the-atmosphere with ceres measurements
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
genre Aerosol Robotic Network
genre_facet Aerosol Robotic Network
op_source Remote Sensing; Volume 11; Issue 18; Pages: 2168
op_relation Atmosphere Remote Sensing
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182168
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 11
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2168
_version_ 1774718480352804864