Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management

This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Gro Ween, Benedict Colombi
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020478
_version_ 1821662332410920960
author Gro Ween
Benedict Colombi
author_facet Gro Ween
Benedict Colombi
author_sort Gro Ween
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 2
container_start_page 478
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 5
description This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation’s natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes’ hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.
format Text
genre Northern Norway
Sámi
genre_facet Northern Norway
Sámi
geographic Norway
Perce
Tana River
geographic_facet Norway
Perce
Tana River
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/5/2/478/
institution Open Polar
language English
long_lat ENVELOPE(-76.000,-76.000,-71.650,-71.650)
ENVELOPE(28.395,28.395,70.503,70.503)
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_container_end_page 495
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020478
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5020478
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_source Sustainability; Volume 5; Issue 2; Pages: 478-495
publishDate 2013
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/5/2/478/ 2025-01-16T23:53:51+00:00 Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management Gro Ween Benedict Colombi agris 2013-01-31 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020478 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5020478 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Sustainability; Volume 5; Issue 2; Pages: 478-495 politics of nature cultural and biological sustainability salmon indigeneity postcolonial epistemology Text 2013 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020478 2023-07-31T20:31:28Z This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation’s natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes’ hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other. Text Northern Norway Sámi MDPI Open Access Publishing Norway Perce ENVELOPE(-76.000,-76.000,-71.650,-71.650) Tana River ENVELOPE(28.395,28.395,70.503,70.503) Sustainability 5 2 478 495
spellingShingle politics of nature
cultural and biological sustainability
salmon
indigeneity
postcolonial epistemology
Gro Ween
Benedict Colombi
Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title_full Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title_fullStr Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title_full_unstemmed Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title_short Two Rivers: The Politics of Wild Salmon, Indigenous Rights and Natural Resource Management
title_sort two rivers: the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management
topic politics of nature
cultural and biological sustainability
salmon
indigeneity
postcolonial epistemology
topic_facet politics of nature
cultural and biological sustainability
salmon
indigeneity
postcolonial epistemology
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020478