Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation

The application of brand theory to destinations has grown in the last few decades, with the destination brand personality being a viable metaphor for creating and positioning destination brands. An often-overlooked tourism typology is geotourism; more specifically, volcanic tourism, since it can be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Flávio Tiago, Pedro Correia, Victor-Alexandru Briciu, Teresa Borges-Tiago
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168874
_version_ 1821551682996142080
author Flávio Tiago
Pedro Correia
Victor-Alexandru Briciu
Teresa Borges-Tiago
author_facet Flávio Tiago
Pedro Correia
Victor-Alexandru Briciu
Teresa Borges-Tiago
author_sort Flávio Tiago
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 16
container_start_page 8874
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 13
description The application of brand theory to destinations has grown in the last few decades, with the destination brand personality being a viable metaphor for creating and positioning destination brands. An often-overlooked tourism typology is geotourism; more specifically, volcanic tourism, since it can be a passive element of any tourism form or active nature tourism. However, its potential is relatively unexplored in terms of online branding. For this reason, the present study analyzes online brand image co-creation, using 300 websites related to three unique volcanic tourism destinations—Iceland, the Azores, and the Canary Islands. Three different types of sources (destination marketing organizations, commercial, and editorial websites) created these contents. The results demonstrate significant differences between the communication of the three destinations, with Iceland, where there is less aligned communication, most valuing geo elements in their communication, and the Azores, where all stakeholders communicate similar brand personality traits, displaying more aligned communication regarding brand personality. In the Canary Islands geotourism is less explored as a destination offer and is consequently less communicated. Acknowledging the different brand positioning and the parity and differentiation points among destinations with the same baseline offer—volcanic tourism—can be helpful for destination brand managers to reignite tourism and promote a unique tourism experience.
format Text
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/13/16/8874/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_coverage agris
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168874
op_relation Tourism, Culture, and Heritage
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168874
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_source Sustainability; Volume 13; Issue 16; Pages: 8874
publishDate 2021
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/13/16/8874/ 2025-01-16T22:34:54+00:00 Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation Flávio Tiago Pedro Correia Victor-Alexandru Briciu Teresa Borges-Tiago agris 2021-08-09 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168874 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Tourism, Culture, and Heritage https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168874 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Sustainability; Volume 13; Issue 16; Pages: 8874 geotourism destination tourism management online branding brand personality Text 2021 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168874 2023-08-01T02:23:28Z The application of brand theory to destinations has grown in the last few decades, with the destination brand personality being a viable metaphor for creating and positioning destination brands. An often-overlooked tourism typology is geotourism; more specifically, volcanic tourism, since it can be a passive element of any tourism form or active nature tourism. However, its potential is relatively unexplored in terms of online branding. For this reason, the present study analyzes online brand image co-creation, using 300 websites related to three unique volcanic tourism destinations—Iceland, the Azores, and the Canary Islands. Three different types of sources (destination marketing organizations, commercial, and editorial websites) created these contents. The results demonstrate significant differences between the communication of the three destinations, with Iceland, where there is less aligned communication, most valuing geo elements in their communication, and the Azores, where all stakeholders communicate similar brand personality traits, displaying more aligned communication regarding brand personality. In the Canary Islands geotourism is less explored as a destination offer and is consequently less communicated. Acknowledging the different brand positioning and the parity and differentiation points among destinations with the same baseline offer—volcanic tourism—can be helpful for destination brand managers to reignite tourism and promote a unique tourism experience. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Sustainability 13 16 8874
spellingShingle geotourism
destination
tourism management
online branding
brand personality
Flávio Tiago
Pedro Correia
Victor-Alexandru Briciu
Teresa Borges-Tiago
Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title_full Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title_fullStr Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title_full_unstemmed Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title_short Geotourism Destinations Online Branding Co-Creation
title_sort geotourism destinations online branding co-creation
topic geotourism
destination
tourism management
online branding
brand personality
topic_facet geotourism
destination
tourism management
online branding
brand personality
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168874