Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland

This paper investigates the role of governance dimensions in socio-economic transitions in line with degrowth, i.e., an equitable downscaling of the economy. Our focus is on experiences from the 2008 economic crisis in Latvia and Iceland. Although these cases are not in themselves examples of degrow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability
Main Authors: Åsa Nyblom, Karolina Isaksson, Mark Sanctuary, Aurore Fransolet, Peter Stigson
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061734
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/11/6/1734/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2071-1050/11/6/1734/ 2023-08-20T04:07:20+02:00 Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland Åsa Nyblom Karolina Isaksson Mark Sanctuary Aurore Fransolet Peter Stigson agris 2019-03-22 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061734 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Social Ecology and Sustainability https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11061734 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Sustainability; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 1734 degrowth equitable downscaling governance institutions policy radical socio-economic transitions Text 2019 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061734 2023-07-31T22:08:12Z This paper investigates the role of governance dimensions in socio-economic transitions in line with degrowth, i.e., an equitable downscaling of the economy. Our focus is on experiences from the 2008 economic crisis in Latvia and Iceland. Although these cases are not in themselves examples of degrowth, we see them as important sources of empirical learning from major socio-economical transitions; furthermore, we see crises as possible starting points for future degrowth transitions. This paper applies a governance framework to explore the vast differences in management strategies and crisis outcomes in Latvia and Iceland. In Iceland, public resistance led to a shift in policy measures such that economic inequality and the negative social consequences of the crisis decreased. In Latvia, public resistance existed but had no strong influence. The outcome in Latvia included none of the elements of equitable downscaling found in the case of Iceland. These two cases show how differences in formal institutional arrangements, political culture and societal trust affect different governance dimensions during a time of crisis. The analysis illustrates the importance of institutional and governance dimensions in major socio-economical transitions, and demonstrates how they influence the kind of transition that can be realized. Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Sustainability 11 6 1734
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic degrowth
equitable downscaling
governance
institutions
policy
radical socio-economic transitions
spellingShingle degrowth
equitable downscaling
governance
institutions
policy
radical socio-economic transitions
Åsa Nyblom
Karolina Isaksson
Mark Sanctuary
Aurore Fransolet
Peter Stigson
Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
topic_facet degrowth
equitable downscaling
governance
institutions
policy
radical socio-economic transitions
description This paper investigates the role of governance dimensions in socio-economic transitions in line with degrowth, i.e., an equitable downscaling of the economy. Our focus is on experiences from the 2008 economic crisis in Latvia and Iceland. Although these cases are not in themselves examples of degrowth, we see them as important sources of empirical learning from major socio-economical transitions; furthermore, we see crises as possible starting points for future degrowth transitions. This paper applies a governance framework to explore the vast differences in management strategies and crisis outcomes in Latvia and Iceland. In Iceland, public resistance led to a shift in policy measures such that economic inequality and the negative social consequences of the crisis decreased. In Latvia, public resistance existed but had no strong influence. The outcome in Latvia included none of the elements of equitable downscaling found in the case of Iceland. These two cases show how differences in formal institutional arrangements, political culture and societal trust affect different governance dimensions during a time of crisis. The analysis illustrates the importance of institutional and governance dimensions in major socio-economical transitions, and demonstrates how they influence the kind of transition that can be realized.
format Text
author Åsa Nyblom
Karolina Isaksson
Mark Sanctuary
Aurore Fransolet
Peter Stigson
author_facet Åsa Nyblom
Karolina Isaksson
Mark Sanctuary
Aurore Fransolet
Peter Stigson
author_sort Åsa Nyblom
title Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
title_short Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
title_full Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
title_fullStr Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Governance and Degrowth. Lessons from the 2008 Financial Crisis in Latvia and Iceland
title_sort governance and degrowth. lessons from the 2008 financial crisis in latvia and iceland
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061734
op_coverage agris
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Sustainability; Volume 11; Issue 6; Pages: 1734
op_relation Social Ecology and Sustainability
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11061734
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061734
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 11
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1734
_version_ 1774718887077609472