E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region

This paper provides a method for determining the economic incentives and limitations for a battery used for peak clipping, with the goal of finding an optimal mix between the battery’s power density and energy density. A ratio called the R-factor has been introduced, which helps determine the energy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:World Electric Vehicle Journal
Main Authors: Bernt Bremdal, Iliana Ilieva, Kristoffer Tangrand, Shayan Dadman
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2032-6653/14/3/61/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/2032-6653/14/3/61/ 2023-08-20T04:04:17+02:00 E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region Bernt Bremdal Iliana Ilieva Kristoffer Tangrand Shayan Dadman 2023-02-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ World Electric Vehicle Journal; Volume 14; Issue 3; Pages: 61 batteries flexibility investment demand response Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061 2023-08-01T09:02:17Z This paper provides a method for determining the economic incentives and limitations for a battery used for peak clipping, with the goal of finding an optimal mix between the battery’s power density and energy density. A ratio called the R-factor has been introduced, which helps determine the energy demand to curb the peak. The paper’s results embrace different investment scenarios showing what battery capacity can be expected, dependent on interest rates, payback time and potential savings in power tariffs due to curtailment. In addition, the paper introduces the “wrench and cut” concept, which can help improve the investment case for batteries by combining battery operations with standard demand response operations. In particular, the effect of using a limited form of demand response-based load deactivation together with a battery has been analyzed. The investigation provided raises a point that battery degradation must be taken into account to prevent the reduction of battery life and possibly the needed payback period. The ultimate target of the presented research refers to vehicle-to-grid/vehicle-to-building developments in the Arctic region, where a vehicle is considered a mobile battery and where flexibility can be delivered in a cost-efficient way. Text Arctic MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic World Electric Vehicle Journal 14 3 61
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic batteries
flexibility
investment
demand response
spellingShingle batteries
flexibility
investment
demand response
Bernt Bremdal
Iliana Ilieva
Kristoffer Tangrand
Shayan Dadman
E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
topic_facet batteries
flexibility
investment
demand response
description This paper provides a method for determining the economic incentives and limitations for a battery used for peak clipping, with the goal of finding an optimal mix between the battery’s power density and energy density. A ratio called the R-factor has been introduced, which helps determine the energy demand to curb the peak. The paper’s results embrace different investment scenarios showing what battery capacity can be expected, dependent on interest rates, payback time and potential savings in power tariffs due to curtailment. In addition, the paper introduces the “wrench and cut” concept, which can help improve the investment case for batteries by combining battery operations with standard demand response operations. In particular, the effect of using a limited form of demand response-based load deactivation together with a battery has been analyzed. The investigation provided raises a point that battery degradation must be taken into account to prevent the reduction of battery life and possibly the needed payback period. The ultimate target of the presented research refers to vehicle-to-grid/vehicle-to-building developments in the Arctic region, where a vehicle is considered a mobile battery and where flexibility can be delivered in a cost-efficient way.
format Text
author Bernt Bremdal
Iliana Ilieva
Kristoffer Tangrand
Shayan Dadman
author_facet Bernt Bremdal
Iliana Ilieva
Kristoffer Tangrand
Shayan Dadman
author_sort Bernt Bremdal
title E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
title_short E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
title_full E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
title_fullStr E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
title_full_unstemmed E-Mobility and Batteries—A Business Case for Flexibility in the Arctic Region
title_sort e-mobility and batteries—a business case for flexibility in the arctic region
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source World Electric Vehicle Journal; Volume 14; Issue 3; Pages: 61
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14030061
container_title World Electric Vehicle Journal
container_volume 14
container_issue 3
container_start_page 61
_version_ 1774714683087912960