Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia

The forest sector in British Columbia (BC) has faced a number of challenges over the past decade. In response to some of those challenges, the government has invested in forest genomic tools. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a biotechnological tool that flags desired traits on the genome. This too...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests
Main Authors: Chelsea Nilausen, Nancy Gélinas, Gary Bull
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110286
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1999-4907/7/11/286/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1999-4907/7/11/286/ 2023-08-20T04:06:32+02:00 Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia Chelsea Nilausen Nancy Gélinas Gary Bull agris 2016-11-18 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110286 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f7110286 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Forests; Volume 7; Issue 11; Pages: 286 marker-assisted selection perception social perception forest genomics biotechnology tree breeding forest stakeholders Text 2016 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110286 2023-07-31T20:59:34Z The forest sector in British Columbia (BC) has faced a number of challenges over the past decade. In response to some of those challenges, the government has invested in forest genomic tools. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a biotechnological tool that flags desired traits on the genome. This tool may assist tree breeders with the early selection of preferred genotypes, reducing the breeding cycle and more accurately and efficiently selecting for improved qualities. However, there is a poor understanding of the perceived acceptability of implementing MAS. Semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire were employed across participants categorized into four groups. It was found that government and industry participants held positive perceptions towards MAS, supporting its use and continued research in BC, and identifying its benefits in forest regeneration and to tree breeders. Environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) and First Nations attitudes lay between neutral and negative. Concerns were most strongly focused on environmental impacts, ecosystem degradation, and reduced genetic diversity, while identified benefits were specific to tree breeders and improved tree resiliency. It was concluded that before MAS can be successfully implemented, an appropriate setting must first be established through improved knowledge of biotechnology and its applications, well-defined policies, and strengthened engagement and consultation with First Nations. Text First Nations MDPI Open Access Publishing Forests 7 12 286
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic marker-assisted selection
perception
social perception
forest genomics
biotechnology
tree breeding
forest stakeholders
spellingShingle marker-assisted selection
perception
social perception
forest genomics
biotechnology
tree breeding
forest stakeholders
Chelsea Nilausen
Nancy Gélinas
Gary Bull
Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
topic_facet marker-assisted selection
perception
social perception
forest genomics
biotechnology
tree breeding
forest stakeholders
description The forest sector in British Columbia (BC) has faced a number of challenges over the past decade. In response to some of those challenges, the government has invested in forest genomic tools. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a biotechnological tool that flags desired traits on the genome. This tool may assist tree breeders with the early selection of preferred genotypes, reducing the breeding cycle and more accurately and efficiently selecting for improved qualities. However, there is a poor understanding of the perceived acceptability of implementing MAS. Semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire were employed across participants categorized into four groups. It was found that government and industry participants held positive perceptions towards MAS, supporting its use and continued research in BC, and identifying its benefits in forest regeneration and to tree breeders. Environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) and First Nations attitudes lay between neutral and negative. Concerns were most strongly focused on environmental impacts, ecosystem degradation, and reduced genetic diversity, while identified benefits were specific to tree breeders and improved tree resiliency. It was concluded that before MAS can be successfully implemented, an appropriate setting must first be established through improved knowledge of biotechnology and its applications, well-defined policies, and strengthened engagement and consultation with First Nations.
format Text
author Chelsea Nilausen
Nancy Gélinas
Gary Bull
author_facet Chelsea Nilausen
Nancy Gélinas
Gary Bull
author_sort Chelsea Nilausen
title Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
title_short Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
title_full Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
title_fullStr Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
title_full_unstemmed Perceived Acceptability of Implementing Marker-Assisted Selection in the Forests of British Columbia
title_sort perceived acceptability of implementing marker-assisted selection in the forests of british columbia
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110286
op_coverage agris
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Forests; Volume 7; Issue 11; Pages: 286
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f7110286
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110286
container_title Forests
container_volume 7
container_issue 12
container_start_page 286
_version_ 1774717689572360192