Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations

Retention forestry is a harvesting system that intentionally retains important forest structures at harvest time. We examined the effect of dispersed retention on the productivity and cost of harvesting operations in a large-scale field experiment in conifer plantations in Hokkaido, Japan. For dispe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests
Main Authors: Toshiyuki Tsushima, Ichiro Watanabe, Nobuhiro Akashi, Kenichi Ozaki
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020324
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1999-4907/14/2/324/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1999-4907/14/2/324/ 2023-08-20T04:09:30+02:00 Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations Toshiyuki Tsushima Ichiro Watanabe Nobuhiro Akashi Kenichi Ozaki agris 2023-02-06 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020324 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Forest Ecology and Management https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f14020324 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Forests; Volume 14; Issue 2; Pages: 324 daily operator report dispersed retention felling green tree retention Japan logging retention forestry revenue Sakhalin fir ( Abies sachalinensis ) time analysis Text 2023 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020324 2023-08-01T08:40:26Z Retention forestry is a harvesting system that intentionally retains important forest structures at harvest time. We examined the effect of dispersed retention on the productivity and cost of harvesting operations in a large-scale field experiment in conifer plantations in Hokkaido, Japan. For dispersed retention, we retained broad-leaved trees in three levels (10, 50, or 100 trees/ha). We used daily operator reports and investigated time consumption (h/m3) of felling and pre-hauling operations and the total cost to roadside. Compared with clearcutting, mean felling time was 7% and 17% longer, and mean pre-hauling time was 20% and 19% longer in 50 and 100 retained trees/ha, respectively. The other operations were not affected by tree retention because they were conducted at pre-existed strip roads or landings where no trees were retained. Increased time consumption caused an increased cost of felling and pre-hauling. Compared with clearcutting, the combined cost of felling and pre-hauling was 14% and 18% higher in 50 and 100 retained trees/ha, respectively. However, the total cost to roadside increased only by 3% compared with clearcutting because these two operations in total occupied 19% of the overall cost, and the cost of the other operations was not affected by tree retention. This suggests that the impact of tree retention on the total cost was small and that the harvesting system used in the present study can reduce cost increment due to tree retention unless trees are not retained on strip roads. Text Sakhalin MDPI Open Access Publishing Forests 14 2 324
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic daily operator report
dispersed retention
felling
green tree retention
Japan
logging
retention forestry
revenue
Sakhalin fir ( Abies sachalinensis )
time analysis
spellingShingle daily operator report
dispersed retention
felling
green tree retention
Japan
logging
retention forestry
revenue
Sakhalin fir ( Abies sachalinensis )
time analysis
Toshiyuki Tsushima
Ichiro Watanabe
Nobuhiro Akashi
Kenichi Ozaki
Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
topic_facet daily operator report
dispersed retention
felling
green tree retention
Japan
logging
retention forestry
revenue
Sakhalin fir ( Abies sachalinensis )
time analysis
description Retention forestry is a harvesting system that intentionally retains important forest structures at harvest time. We examined the effect of dispersed retention on the productivity and cost of harvesting operations in a large-scale field experiment in conifer plantations in Hokkaido, Japan. For dispersed retention, we retained broad-leaved trees in three levels (10, 50, or 100 trees/ha). We used daily operator reports and investigated time consumption (h/m3) of felling and pre-hauling operations and the total cost to roadside. Compared with clearcutting, mean felling time was 7% and 17% longer, and mean pre-hauling time was 20% and 19% longer in 50 and 100 retained trees/ha, respectively. The other operations were not affected by tree retention because they were conducted at pre-existed strip roads or landings where no trees were retained. Increased time consumption caused an increased cost of felling and pre-hauling. Compared with clearcutting, the combined cost of felling and pre-hauling was 14% and 18% higher in 50 and 100 retained trees/ha, respectively. However, the total cost to roadside increased only by 3% compared with clearcutting because these two operations in total occupied 19% of the overall cost, and the cost of the other operations was not affected by tree retention. This suggests that the impact of tree retention on the total cost was small and that the harvesting system used in the present study can reduce cost increment due to tree retention unless trees are not retained on strip roads.
format Text
author Toshiyuki Tsushima
Ichiro Watanabe
Nobuhiro Akashi
Kenichi Ozaki
author_facet Toshiyuki Tsushima
Ichiro Watanabe
Nobuhiro Akashi
Kenichi Ozaki
author_sort Toshiyuki Tsushima
title Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
title_short Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
title_full Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
title_fullStr Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
title_full_unstemmed Productivity and Cost of Retention Harvesting Operation in Conifer Plantations
title_sort productivity and cost of retention harvesting operation in conifer plantations
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020324
op_coverage agris
genre Sakhalin
genre_facet Sakhalin
op_source Forests; Volume 14; Issue 2; Pages: 324
op_relation Forest Ecology and Management
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f14020324
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020324
container_title Forests
container_volume 14
container_issue 2
container_start_page 324
_version_ 1774722504480260096