Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis

A gas hydrate reservoir, identified by the presence of the bottom simulating reflector, is located offshore of the Antarctic Peninsula. The analysis of geophysical dataset acquired during three geophysical cruises allowed us to characterize this reservoir. 2D velocity fields were obtained by using t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Maria Filomena Loreto, Umberta Tinivella, Flavio Accaino, Michela Giustiniani
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Molecular Diversity Preservation International 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010039
_version_ 1821583428400709632
author Maria Filomena Loreto
Umberta Tinivella
Flavio Accaino
Michela Giustiniani
author_facet Maria Filomena Loreto
Umberta Tinivella
Flavio Accaino
Michela Giustiniani
author_sort Maria Filomena Loreto
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Energies
container_volume 4
description A gas hydrate reservoir, identified by the presence of the bottom simulating reflector, is located offshore of the Antarctic Peninsula. The analysis of geophysical dataset acquired during three geophysical cruises allowed us to characterize this reservoir. 2D velocity fields were obtained by using the output of the pre-stack depth migration iteratively. Gas hydrate amount was estimated by seismic velocity, using the modified Biot-Geerstma-Smit theory. The total volume of gas hydrate estimated, in an area of about 600 km2, is in a range of 16 × 109–20 × 109 m3. Assuming that 1 m3 of gas hydrate corresponds to 140 m3 of free gas in standard conditions, the reservoir could contain a total volume that ranges from 1.68 to 2.8 × 1012 m3 of free gas. The interpretation of the pre-stack depth migrated sections and the high resolution morpho-bathymetry image allowed us to define a structural model of the area. Two main fault systems, characterized by left transtensive and compressive movement, are recognized, which interact with a minor transtensive fault system. The regional geothermal gradient (about 37.5 °C/km), increasing close to a mud volcano likely due to fluid-upwelling, was estimated through the depth of the bottom simulating reflector by seismic data.
format Text
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
geographic Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
The Antarctic
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/4/1/39/
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftmdpi
op_container_end_page 56
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010039
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en4010039
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_source Energies; Volume 4; Issue 1; Pages: 39-56
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/4/1/39/ 2025-01-16T19:07:12+00:00 Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis Maria Filomena Loreto Umberta Tinivella Flavio Accaino Michela Giustiniani 2010-12-31 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010039 EN eng Molecular Diversity Preservation International https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en4010039 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Energies; Volume 4; Issue 1; Pages: 39-56 BSR CIGs velocity model gas estimate bathymetry tectonics Antarctic Peninsula Text 2010 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010039 2023-07-31T20:25:49Z A gas hydrate reservoir, identified by the presence of the bottom simulating reflector, is located offshore of the Antarctic Peninsula. The analysis of geophysical dataset acquired during three geophysical cruises allowed us to characterize this reservoir. 2D velocity fields were obtained by using the output of the pre-stack depth migration iteratively. Gas hydrate amount was estimated by seismic velocity, using the modified Biot-Geerstma-Smit theory. The total volume of gas hydrate estimated, in an area of about 600 km2, is in a range of 16 × 109–20 × 109 m3. Assuming that 1 m3 of gas hydrate corresponds to 140 m3 of free gas in standard conditions, the reservoir could contain a total volume that ranges from 1.68 to 2.8 × 1012 m3 of free gas. The interpretation of the pre-stack depth migrated sections and the high resolution morpho-bathymetry image allowed us to define a structural model of the area. Two main fault systems, characterized by left transtensive and compressive movement, are recognized, which interact with a minor transtensive fault system. The regional geothermal gradient (about 37.5 °C/km), increasing close to a mud volcano likely due to fluid-upwelling, was estimated through the depth of the bottom simulating reflector by seismic data. Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula MDPI Open Access Publishing Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula The Antarctic Energies 4 1 39 56
spellingShingle BSR
CIGs
velocity model
gas estimate
bathymetry
tectonics
Antarctic Peninsula
Maria Filomena Loreto
Umberta Tinivella
Flavio Accaino
Michela Giustiniani
Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title_full Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title_fullStr Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title_short Offshore Antarctic Peninsula Gas Hydrate Reservoir Characterization by Geophysical Data Analysis
title_sort offshore antarctic peninsula gas hydrate reservoir characterization by geophysical data analysis
topic BSR
CIGs
velocity model
gas estimate
bathymetry
tectonics
Antarctic Peninsula
topic_facet BSR
CIGs
velocity model
gas estimate
bathymetry
tectonics
Antarctic Peninsula
url https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010039