Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies

Offshore geological sequestration of CO2 offers a viable approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. Strategies include injection of CO2 into the deep-ocean or ocean-floor sediments, whereby depending on pressure–temperature conditions, CO2 can be trapped physically, gravitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Authors: Steven Constable, Laura A. Stern
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197411
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/15/19/7411/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/15/19/7411/ 2023-08-20T04:07:58+02:00 Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies Steven Constable Laura A. Stern 2022-10-09 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197411 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute I1: Fuel https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15197411 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Energies; Volume 15; Issue 19; Pages: 7411 carbon sequestration CO 2 offshore storage marine CSEM gas hydrates Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197411 2023-08-01T06:48:30Z Offshore geological sequestration of CO2 offers a viable approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. Strategies include injection of CO2 into the deep-ocean or ocean-floor sediments, whereby depending on pressure–temperature conditions, CO2 can be trapped physically, gravitationally, or converted to CO2 hydrate. Energy-driven research continues to also advance CO2-for-CH4 replacement strategies in the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ), producing methane for natural gas needs while sequestering CO2. In all cases, safe storage of CO2 requires reliable monitoring of the targeted CO2 injection sites and the integrity of the repository over time, including possible leakage. Electromagnetic technologies used for oil and gas exploration, sensitive to electrical conductivity, have long been considered an optimal monitoring method, as CO2, similar to hydrocarbons, typically exhibits lower conductivity than the surrounding medium. We apply 3D controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) forward modeling code to simulate an evolving CO2 reservoir in deep-ocean sediments, demonstrating sufficient sensitivity and resolution of CSEM data to detect reservoir changes even before sophisticated inversion of data. Laboratory measurements place further constraints on evaluating certain systems within the GHSZ; notably, CO2 hydrate is measurably weaker than methane hydrate, and >1 order of magnitude more conductive, properties that may affect site selection, stability, and modeling considerations. Text Methane hydrate MDPI Open Access Publishing Energies 15 19 7411
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic carbon sequestration
CO 2 offshore storage
marine CSEM
gas hydrates
spellingShingle carbon sequestration
CO 2 offshore storage
marine CSEM
gas hydrates
Steven Constable
Laura A. Stern
Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
topic_facet carbon sequestration
CO 2 offshore storage
marine CSEM
gas hydrates
description Offshore geological sequestration of CO2 offers a viable approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. Strategies include injection of CO2 into the deep-ocean or ocean-floor sediments, whereby depending on pressure–temperature conditions, CO2 can be trapped physically, gravitationally, or converted to CO2 hydrate. Energy-driven research continues to also advance CO2-for-CH4 replacement strategies in the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ), producing methane for natural gas needs while sequestering CO2. In all cases, safe storage of CO2 requires reliable monitoring of the targeted CO2 injection sites and the integrity of the repository over time, including possible leakage. Electromagnetic technologies used for oil and gas exploration, sensitive to electrical conductivity, have long been considered an optimal monitoring method, as CO2, similar to hydrocarbons, typically exhibits lower conductivity than the surrounding medium. We apply 3D controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) forward modeling code to simulate an evolving CO2 reservoir in deep-ocean sediments, demonstrating sufficient sensitivity and resolution of CSEM data to detect reservoir changes even before sophisticated inversion of data. Laboratory measurements place further constraints on evaluating certain systems within the GHSZ; notably, CO2 hydrate is measurably weaker than methane hydrate, and >1 order of magnitude more conductive, properties that may affect site selection, stability, and modeling considerations.
format Text
author Steven Constable
Laura A. Stern
author_facet Steven Constable
Laura A. Stern
author_sort Steven Constable
title Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
title_short Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
title_full Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
title_fullStr Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Offshore CO2 Sequestration Using Marine CSEM Methods; Constraints Inferred from Field- and Laboratory-Based Gas Hydrate Studies
title_sort monitoring offshore co2 sequestration using marine csem methods; constraints inferred from field- and laboratory-based gas hydrate studies
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197411
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_source Energies; Volume 15; Issue 19; Pages: 7411
op_relation I1: Fuel
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15197411
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197411
container_title Energies
container_volume 15
container_issue 19
container_start_page 7411
_version_ 1774719965194092544