Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization

The main problem of fluid sampling during well testing of reservoirs with near-critical fluids (gas condensate and volatile oil) is due to the fact that even a small pressure drawdown usually leads to the formation of a two-phase mixture in the bottom hole area, and it is almost impossible to take r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies
Main Author: Alexander V. Muravyev
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155419
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/15/15/5419/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1996-1073/15/15/5419/ 2023-08-20T04:05:01+02:00 Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization Alexander V. Muravyev 2022-07-27 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155419 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute H1: Petroleum Engineering https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15155419 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Energies; Volume 15; Issue 15; Pages: 5419 gas condensate representative samples isokinetic sampling MIKS technology production optimization condensate bank well testing multiphase flowmeters Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155419 2023-08-01T05:51:25Z The main problem of fluid sampling during well testing of reservoirs with near-critical fluids (gas condensate and volatile oil) is due to the fact that even a small pressure drawdown usually leads to the formation of a two-phase mixture in the bottom hole area, and it is almost impossible to take representative samples with downhole samplers or a formation tester. Sampling via test-separator and the current non-separation methods are also imperfect. An alternative method—MIKS (Multiphase IsoKinetic Sampling)—of gas condensate well testing was proposed, which is based on emulsifying a multiphase flow to particles of about 1–10 μm. Thereby MIKS would eliminate the problem of particle slippage in a homogeneous flow and enables high-quality sampling directly from the flowmeter line. The initial formation fluid is characterized by the maximum value of the condensate-gas ratio (CGR). Therefore, first, the well effluent would be adjusted to the mode with the maximum CGR using a choke manifold and a multiphase flow meter. Then the flow mixture is transferred to a by-pass line with an emulsifier to achieve an isokinetic flow. Thereafter, pressure samples can be taken into pressurized sampling bottles, in which thermodynamic conditions are preset according to the flow line. The efficiency of sampling and recombining procedures allows for conducting a study of reservoir samples in the field laboratory directly on the rig and obtaining a complete PVT report even before the completion of drilling and abandonment of the well. An additional economic effect is achieved by reducing the costs of transporting and samples storage. Well test equipment setup becomes much more compact and less weight; the costs of drilling time are reduced, which is viably important for well testing on the Arctic conditions. Another major problem in the development of gas condensate reservoirs is avoiding the condensate banking around producing wells. Optimization of condensate production can be achieved by maintaining the well operation mode at ... Text Arctic MDPI Open Access Publishing Arctic Energies 15 15 5419
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic gas condensate
representative samples
isokinetic sampling
MIKS technology
production optimization
condensate bank
well testing
multiphase flowmeters
spellingShingle gas condensate
representative samples
isokinetic sampling
MIKS technology
production optimization
condensate bank
well testing
multiphase flowmeters
Alexander V. Muravyev
Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
topic_facet gas condensate
representative samples
isokinetic sampling
MIKS technology
production optimization
condensate bank
well testing
multiphase flowmeters
description The main problem of fluid sampling during well testing of reservoirs with near-critical fluids (gas condensate and volatile oil) is due to the fact that even a small pressure drawdown usually leads to the formation of a two-phase mixture in the bottom hole area, and it is almost impossible to take representative samples with downhole samplers or a formation tester. Sampling via test-separator and the current non-separation methods are also imperfect. An alternative method—MIKS (Multiphase IsoKinetic Sampling)—of gas condensate well testing was proposed, which is based on emulsifying a multiphase flow to particles of about 1–10 μm. Thereby MIKS would eliminate the problem of particle slippage in a homogeneous flow and enables high-quality sampling directly from the flowmeter line. The initial formation fluid is characterized by the maximum value of the condensate-gas ratio (CGR). Therefore, first, the well effluent would be adjusted to the mode with the maximum CGR using a choke manifold and a multiphase flow meter. Then the flow mixture is transferred to a by-pass line with an emulsifier to achieve an isokinetic flow. Thereafter, pressure samples can be taken into pressurized sampling bottles, in which thermodynamic conditions are preset according to the flow line. The efficiency of sampling and recombining procedures allows for conducting a study of reservoir samples in the field laboratory directly on the rig and obtaining a complete PVT report even before the completion of drilling and abandonment of the well. An additional economic effect is achieved by reducing the costs of transporting and samples storage. Well test equipment setup becomes much more compact and less weight; the costs of drilling time are reduced, which is viably important for well testing on the Arctic conditions. Another major problem in the development of gas condensate reservoirs is avoiding the condensate banking around producing wells. Optimization of condensate production can be achieved by maintaining the well operation mode at ...
format Text
author Alexander V. Muravyev
author_facet Alexander V. Muravyev
author_sort Alexander V. Muravyev
title Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
title_short Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
title_full Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
title_fullStr Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
title_full_unstemmed Gas Condensate Wells: Challenges of Sampling, Testing and Production Optimization
title_sort gas condensate wells: challenges of sampling, testing and production optimization
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155419
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Energies; Volume 15; Issue 15; Pages: 5419
op_relation H1: Petroleum Engineering
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en15155419
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155419
container_title Energies
container_volume 15
container_issue 15
container_start_page 5419
_version_ 1774715438134984704