Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks

On 3 April 2016, Mossack Fonseca provided the historically most significant leak of its shareholder’s data for owning offshore companies. Shareholders include many political and influential figures around the globe, which causes a moral hazard. The study analyses the effects of Panama leak events on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Main Authors: Adeel Nasir, Ștefan Cristian Gherghina, Mário Nuno Mata, Kanwal Iqbal Khan, Pedro Neves Mata, Joaquim António Ferrão
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079
id ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1911-8074/15/2/79/
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmdpi:oai:mdpi.com:/1911-8074/15/2/79/ 2023-08-20T04:07:24+02:00 Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks Adeel Nasir Ștefan Cristian Gherghina Mário Nuno Mata Kanwal Iqbal Khan Pedro Neves Mata Joaquim António Ferrão 2022-02-14 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079 EN eng Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Journal of Risk and Financial Management; Volume 15; Issue 2; Pages: 79 Panama papers financial markets political stability investor perception stock market efficiency event study methodology Text 2022 ftmdpi https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079 2023-08-01T04:09:03Z On 3 April 2016, Mossack Fonseca provided the historically most significant leak of its shareholder’s data for owning offshore companies. Shareholders include many political and influential figures around the globe, which causes a moral hazard. The study analyses the effects of Panama leak events on five stock exchanges to ensure the market efficiency and investor perception related to the Panama leaks. Event study methodology is used on five occasions associated with Panama papers, i.e., the resignation of the Prime Minister of Iceland on 5 April 2016, Jurgen Mossack’s resignation on 7 April 2016, the resignation of the Spanish Minister of Industry on 15 April 2016, the 450 personalities of Pakistan that were nominated in Panama papers on 15 April 2016, and the formation of an inquiry commission to inquire into the matter. The market efficiency of five stock exchanges was checked, i.e., the KSE 100 of Pakistan, the OMXIPI exchange of Iceland, the IBEX 35 of Spain, the New York stock exchange (NYSE), and S&P 500. The market remains efficient for most events and investor behaviour changes for one or two days around the event day (this event has concise term significant abnormal returns in all stock exchanges or concise term significant abnormal macroeconomic effects are observed in all stock exchanges). Text Iceland MDPI Open Access Publishing Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15 2 79
institution Open Polar
collection MDPI Open Access Publishing
op_collection_id ftmdpi
language English
topic Panama papers
financial markets
political stability
investor perception
stock market efficiency
event study methodology
spellingShingle Panama papers
financial markets
political stability
investor perception
stock market efficiency
event study methodology
Adeel Nasir
Ștefan Cristian Gherghina
Mário Nuno Mata
Kanwal Iqbal Khan
Pedro Neves Mata
Joaquim António Ferrão
Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
topic_facet Panama papers
financial markets
political stability
investor perception
stock market efficiency
event study methodology
description On 3 April 2016, Mossack Fonseca provided the historically most significant leak of its shareholder’s data for owning offshore companies. Shareholders include many political and influential figures around the globe, which causes a moral hazard. The study analyses the effects of Panama leak events on five stock exchanges to ensure the market efficiency and investor perception related to the Panama leaks. Event study methodology is used on five occasions associated with Panama papers, i.e., the resignation of the Prime Minister of Iceland on 5 April 2016, Jurgen Mossack’s resignation on 7 April 2016, the resignation of the Spanish Minister of Industry on 15 April 2016, the 450 personalities of Pakistan that were nominated in Panama papers on 15 April 2016, and the formation of an inquiry commission to inquire into the matter. The market efficiency of five stock exchanges was checked, i.e., the KSE 100 of Pakistan, the OMXIPI exchange of Iceland, the IBEX 35 of Spain, the New York stock exchange (NYSE), and S&P 500. The market remains efficient for most events and investor behaviour changes for one or two days around the event day (this event has concise term significant abnormal returns in all stock exchanges or concise term significant abnormal macroeconomic effects are observed in all stock exchanges).
format Text
author Adeel Nasir
Ștefan Cristian Gherghina
Mário Nuno Mata
Kanwal Iqbal Khan
Pedro Neves Mata
Joaquim António Ferrão
author_facet Adeel Nasir
Ștefan Cristian Gherghina
Mário Nuno Mata
Kanwal Iqbal Khan
Pedro Neves Mata
Joaquim António Ferrão
author_sort Adeel Nasir
title Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
title_short Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
title_full Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
title_fullStr Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
title_full_unstemmed Testing Stock Market Efficiency from Spillover Effect of Panama Leaks
title_sort testing stock market efficiency from spillover effect of panama leaks
publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Journal of Risk and Financial Management; Volume 15; Issue 2; Pages: 79
op_relation https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15020079
container_title Journal of Risk and Financial Management
container_volume 15
container_issue 2
container_start_page 79
_version_ 1774719010332475392