O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků

The article is introduced by a survey and discussion of previous models of classification of the Samoyedic languages. The main part is devoted to a new model of classification, based on application of so-called recalibrated glottochronology, including a full documentation of wordlists with etymologi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Blažek, Václav
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Czech
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130145
id ftmasarykufarts:oai:digilib.phil.muni.cz:node-27445
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmasarykufarts:oai:digilib.phil.muni.cz:node-27445 2023-05-15T16:06:11+02:00 O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků Blažek, Václav 2014 text/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130145 cze cze https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/en/handle/11222.digilib/100002 https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/_flysystem/fedora/pdf/130145.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130145 embargoed access Samoyedic Uralic Finno-Ugric genetic classification recalibrated glottochronology Slavonic Studies Linguistics Czech Studies (language) Article 2014 ftmasarykufarts 2023-01-31T17:31:39Z The article is introduced by a survey and discussion of previous models of classification of the Samoyedic languages. The main part is devoted to a new model of classification, based on application of so-called recalibrated glottochronology, including a full documentation of wordlists with etymological remarks, statistics and sources. Finally, the present results are compared with previous models. The article follows the study of Hofírková & Blažek 2012, completing so the Uralic language family, consisting of Finno-Ugric and Samoyedic. The most important result of the present contribution is a dating of disintegration of Samoyedic to the 3rd – 2nd cent. BCE, i. e. between disintegrations of its neighbours, Ob-Ugric around 400 BCE and Turkic around 100 BCE. Applying the cladistic strategy based on average values of percentages expressing mutual relations, in the Samoyedic dialect continuum three primarily parallel branches may be determined: North Samoyedic, Selkup and Sayan Samoyedic. Relatively low scores of Nganasan with all other languages (with exception of Enets) probably indicate an influence of a pre-Samoyedic substratum of the Taimyr Peninsula. On the other hand, it is not excluded that the Sayan Samoyedic branch was secondarily 'formed' thanks to the geographical neighbourhood of Kamasin (& Koibal) and Mator (& Taigi and Karagas). In this case, the idea of Helimski (1982) of four coordinate branches would be confirmed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Enets Nganasan* samojed* samojed* samoyed* Selkup Taimyr Digital Library of the Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University
institution Open Polar
collection Digital Library of the Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University
op_collection_id ftmasarykufarts
language Czech
topic Samoyedic
Uralic
Finno-Ugric
genetic classification
recalibrated glottochronology
Slavonic Studies
Linguistics
Czech Studies (language)
spellingShingle Samoyedic
Uralic
Finno-Ugric
genetic classification
recalibrated glottochronology
Slavonic Studies
Linguistics
Czech Studies (language)
Blažek, Václav
O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
topic_facet Samoyedic
Uralic
Finno-Ugric
genetic classification
recalibrated glottochronology
Slavonic Studies
Linguistics
Czech Studies (language)
description The article is introduced by a survey and discussion of previous models of classification of the Samoyedic languages. The main part is devoted to a new model of classification, based on application of so-called recalibrated glottochronology, including a full documentation of wordlists with etymological remarks, statistics and sources. Finally, the present results are compared with previous models. The article follows the study of Hofírková & Blažek 2012, completing so the Uralic language family, consisting of Finno-Ugric and Samoyedic. The most important result of the present contribution is a dating of disintegration of Samoyedic to the 3rd – 2nd cent. BCE, i. e. between disintegrations of its neighbours, Ob-Ugric around 400 BCE and Turkic around 100 BCE. Applying the cladistic strategy based on average values of percentages expressing mutual relations, in the Samoyedic dialect continuum three primarily parallel branches may be determined: North Samoyedic, Selkup and Sayan Samoyedic. Relatively low scores of Nganasan with all other languages (with exception of Enets) probably indicate an influence of a pre-Samoyedic substratum of the Taimyr Peninsula. On the other hand, it is not excluded that the Sayan Samoyedic branch was secondarily 'formed' thanks to the geographical neighbourhood of Kamasin (& Koibal) and Mator (& Taigi and Karagas). In this case, the idea of Helimski (1982) of four coordinate branches would be confirmed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Blažek, Václav
author_facet Blažek, Václav
author_sort Blažek, Václav
title O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
title_short O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
title_full O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
title_fullStr O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
title_full_unstemmed O klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
title_sort o klasifikaci samojedských jazyků
publishDate 2014
url https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130145
genre Enets
Nganasan*
samojed*
samojed*
samoyed*
Selkup
Taimyr
genre_facet Enets
Nganasan*
samojed*
samojed*
samoyed*
Selkup
Taimyr
op_relation https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/en/handle/11222.digilib/100002
https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/_flysystem/fedora/pdf/130145.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/130145
op_rights embargoed access
_version_ 1766402092995444736