Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies

Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Everett Karen, Halašková Barbora
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://is.muni.cz/publication/2212619
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000183
id ftmasarykis:oai:is.muni.cz:2212619
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmasarykis:oai:is.muni.cz:2212619 2023-10-25T01:33:52+02:00 Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies Everett Karen Halašková Barbora 2022 14 https://is.muni.cz/publication/2212619 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000183 eng eng Cambridge University Press https://is.muni.cz/publication/2212619 info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Polar Record Science diplomacy Arctic strategies Research cooperation Foreign policy Arctic states info:eu-repo/semantics/article J 2022 ftmasarykis https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000183 2023-09-28T15:32:22Z Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy, science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Polar Record Masaryk University: Open Services of Information System Arctic Polar Record 58
institution Open Polar
collection Masaryk University: Open Services of Information System
op_collection_id ftmasarykis
language English
topic Science diplomacy
Arctic strategies
Research cooperation
Foreign policy
Arctic states
spellingShingle Science diplomacy
Arctic strategies
Research cooperation
Foreign policy
Arctic states
Everett Karen
Halašková Barbora
Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
topic_facet Science diplomacy
Arctic strategies
Research cooperation
Foreign policy
Arctic states
description Dominant geopolitical narratives on the Arctic argue that the region is either edging towards conflict or international law is respected and peace is maintained through cooperation to address shared concerns. While both of these narratives are present in the Arctic states’ strategies, most of them tend to support collaborative efforts. Science diplomacy (SD) is a useful mechanism in this regard as it helps states overcome potential disagreements and can stimulate cooperation in other areas. Given the growing concerns about global risks, SD is more important now than ever before. In our study, we identify and focus on three indicators for potential SD in the Arctic strategies: i) scientific infrastructure; ii) membership in intergovernmental/interparliamentary and scientific/education organisations and networks and iii) specific areas of scientific cooperation. Considering the intensive scientific activity in the region, it is not surprising that the strategies discuss different forms of research and scientific cooperation, although none explicitly use the term “science diplomacy”. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals the Arctic states do apply the SD concept in their strategies and use three types of diplomacy – science in diplomacy, science for diplomacy or diplomacy for science – in the three indicators.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Everett Karen
Halašková Barbora
author_facet Everett Karen
Halašková Barbora
author_sort Everett Karen
title Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_short Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_full Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_fullStr Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_full_unstemmed Is it real? Science diplomacy in the Arctic states’ strategies
title_sort is it real? science diplomacy in the arctic states’ strategies
publisher Cambridge University Press
publishDate 2022
url https://is.muni.cz/publication/2212619
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000183
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Polar Record
genre_facet Arctic
Polar Record
op_source Polar Record
op_relation https://is.muni.cz/publication/2212619
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000183
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 58
_version_ 1780729237297168384