A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test

Cetacean entanglements in fishing gear cost governments, fishermen and stakeholders millions of dollars a year, and often result in serious injury or death of the entangled animals. Entanglements have been implicated in preventing the recovery of some large whale populations. Acoustic deterrents on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Endangered Species Research
Main Authors: Harcourt, Robert, Pirotta, Vanessa, Heller, Gillian, Peddemors, Victor, Slip, David
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/456b8006-3030-4368-918b-d783bac96131
https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914182822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftmacquarieunicr:oai:https://researchers.mq.edu.au:publications/456b8006-3030-4368-918b-d783bac96131
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmacquarieunicr:oai:https://researchers.mq.edu.au:publications/456b8006-3030-4368-918b-d783bac96131 2024-06-09T07:46:37+00:00 A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test Harcourt, Robert Pirotta, Vanessa Heller, Gillian Peddemors, Victor Slip, David 2014 https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/456b8006-3030-4368-918b-d783bac96131 https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914182822&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Harcourt , R , Pirotta , V , Heller , G , Peddemors , V & Slip , D 2014 , ' A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales : An empirical test ' , Endangered Species Research , vol. 25 , no. 1 , pp. 35-42 . https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614 article 2014 ftmacquarieunicr https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614 2024-05-16T14:21:49Z Cetacean entanglements in fishing gear cost governments, fishermen and stakeholders millions of dollars a year, and often result in serious injury or death of the entangled animals. Entanglements have been implicated in preventing the recovery of some large whale populations. Acoustic deterrents on fishing nets are widely used to reduce incidental captures of dolphins and porpoises, but there is little evidence as to whether they effectively deter large whales. We tested whether a low-frequency whale alarm (3 kHz Whale Pinger ® , 135 ± 5 db, 5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration) deterred Southern Hemisphere humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae from approaching a potential source of entanglement. Northerly migrating humpback whale pods were tracked by an observer blind to alarm status (on/off) as they passed an alarm moored in the centre of the peak migration path. Of 137 pods tracked, 82 (60%) passed within the assumed detectable range (500 m) of the alarm, 51/78 (65%) when it was on and 31/59 (52%) when it was off(p = 0.18). There was no discernible response to the alarm. Whale pods did not differ in directionality, course heading or dive duration when within detectable range of the alarm, whether it was on or off, and a number of pods passed directly over the alarm while it was operational. This suggests that single alarms as currently configured and attached to a trap or pot line are unlikely to effectively deter humpback whales from approaching potential hazards, at least during their northerly migration phase. Article in Journal/Newspaper Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Macquarie University Research Portal Endangered Species Research 25 1 35 42
institution Open Polar
collection Macquarie University Research Portal
op_collection_id ftmacquarieunicr
language English
description Cetacean entanglements in fishing gear cost governments, fishermen and stakeholders millions of dollars a year, and often result in serious injury or death of the entangled animals. Entanglements have been implicated in preventing the recovery of some large whale populations. Acoustic deterrents on fishing nets are widely used to reduce incidental captures of dolphins and porpoises, but there is little evidence as to whether they effectively deter large whales. We tested whether a low-frequency whale alarm (3 kHz Whale Pinger ® , 135 ± 5 db, 5 s emission interval and 400 ms emission duration) deterred Southern Hemisphere humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae from approaching a potential source of entanglement. Northerly migrating humpback whale pods were tracked by an observer blind to alarm status (on/off) as they passed an alarm moored in the centre of the peak migration path. Of 137 pods tracked, 82 (60%) passed within the assumed detectable range (500 m) of the alarm, 51/78 (65%) when it was on and 31/59 (52%) when it was off(p = 0.18). There was no discernible response to the alarm. Whale pods did not differ in directionality, course heading or dive duration when within detectable range of the alarm, whether it was on or off, and a number of pods passed directly over the alarm while it was operational. This suggests that single alarms as currently configured and attached to a trap or pot line are unlikely to effectively deter humpback whales from approaching potential hazards, at least during their northerly migration phase.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Harcourt, Robert
Pirotta, Vanessa
Heller, Gillian
Peddemors, Victor
Slip, David
spellingShingle Harcourt, Robert
Pirotta, Vanessa
Heller, Gillian
Peddemors, Victor
Slip, David
A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
author_facet Harcourt, Robert
Pirotta, Vanessa
Heller, Gillian
Peddemors, Victor
Slip, David
author_sort Harcourt, Robert
title A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
title_short A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
title_full A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
title_fullStr A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
title_full_unstemmed A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:An empirical test
title_sort whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales:an empirical test
publishDate 2014
url https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/456b8006-3030-4368-918b-d783bac96131
https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914182822&partnerID=8YFLogxK
genre Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
genre_facet Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
op_source Harcourt , R , Pirotta , V , Heller , G , Peddemors , V & Slip , D 2014 , ' A whale alarm fails to deter migrating humpback whales : An empirical test ' , Endangered Species Research , vol. 25 , no. 1 , pp. 35-42 . https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00614
container_title Endangered Species Research
container_volume 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
op_container_end_page 42
_version_ 1801376566115041280