Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia

Shark species worldwide are under threat mainly from over harvesting either as by catch or in targeted fisheries. In Australia shark flesh is mostly sold under the name 'flake' and distributed around the country. The Australian Fish Names Standard state that sharks sold under the name flak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teagan Parker Kielniacz
Format: Thesis
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.25949/19438667.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Genetic_identification_of_sharks_traded_and_consumed_in_Australia/19438667
id ftmacquariefig:oai:figshare.com:article/19438667
record_format openpolar
spelling ftmacquariefig:oai:figshare.com:article/19438667 2023-05-15T13:41:11+02:00 Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia Teagan Parker Kielniacz 2021-07-26T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.25949/19438667.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Genetic_identification_of_sharks_traded_and_consumed_in_Australia/19438667 unknown doi:10.25949/19438667.v1 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Genetic_identification_of_sharks_traded_and_consumed_in_Australia/19438667 In Copyright Other education not elsewhere classified mislablleing Shark fishing -- Australia Shark fishing Fishing management DNA barcoding threatened species Fishing management -- Australia seafood Text Thesis 2021 ftmacquariefig https://doi.org/10.25949/19438667.v1 2022-12-28T08:38:38Z Shark species worldwide are under threat mainly from over harvesting either as by catch or in targeted fisheries. In Australia shark flesh is mostly sold under the name 'flake' and distributed around the country. The Australian Fish Names Standard state that sharks sold under the name flake must be either Australian Gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) or New Zealand rig (Mustelus lenticulatus), however labelling is not mandatory. In this study we hypothesized that many sharks sold as flake did not qualify under the naming standard, and that threatened species were being traded. We used DNA barcoding to identify species from 91 samples obtained from 29 seafood retailers across the country. To determine species composition we used Sanger sequencing of two genes, the Cytochrome Oxidase subunit one gene (CO1) and the 12S mitochondrial RNA gene (12S). We identified 67 cases (78.8%) of misllabeling and 16 cases (35.6%) of threatened species being traded, including the Scalloped Hammerhead (Sphryna lewini) and School Shark (Galeorhinus galeus). Our results showed that mislabelling of shark flesh is occurring in Australia, and that threatened species make up a sizeable portion of the species sold. These data demonstrate the need to improve labelling standards to work towards minimizing our impact on threatened shark species -- abstract Thesis Antarc* antarcticus Research from Macquarie University New Zealand
institution Open Polar
collection Research from Macquarie University
op_collection_id ftmacquariefig
language unknown
topic Other education not elsewhere classified
mislablleing
Shark fishing -- Australia
Shark fishing
Fishing management
DNA barcoding
threatened species
Fishing management -- Australia
seafood
spellingShingle Other education not elsewhere classified
mislablleing
Shark fishing -- Australia
Shark fishing
Fishing management
DNA barcoding
threatened species
Fishing management -- Australia
seafood
Teagan Parker Kielniacz
Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
topic_facet Other education not elsewhere classified
mislablleing
Shark fishing -- Australia
Shark fishing
Fishing management
DNA barcoding
threatened species
Fishing management -- Australia
seafood
description Shark species worldwide are under threat mainly from over harvesting either as by catch or in targeted fisheries. In Australia shark flesh is mostly sold under the name 'flake' and distributed around the country. The Australian Fish Names Standard state that sharks sold under the name flake must be either Australian Gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) or New Zealand rig (Mustelus lenticulatus), however labelling is not mandatory. In this study we hypothesized that many sharks sold as flake did not qualify under the naming standard, and that threatened species were being traded. We used DNA barcoding to identify species from 91 samples obtained from 29 seafood retailers across the country. To determine species composition we used Sanger sequencing of two genes, the Cytochrome Oxidase subunit one gene (CO1) and the 12S mitochondrial RNA gene (12S). We identified 67 cases (78.8%) of misllabeling and 16 cases (35.6%) of threatened species being traded, including the Scalloped Hammerhead (Sphryna lewini) and School Shark (Galeorhinus galeus). Our results showed that mislabelling of shark flesh is occurring in Australia, and that threatened species make up a sizeable portion of the species sold. These data demonstrate the need to improve labelling standards to work towards minimizing our impact on threatened shark species -- abstract
format Thesis
author Teagan Parker Kielniacz
author_facet Teagan Parker Kielniacz
author_sort Teagan Parker Kielniacz
title Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
title_short Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
title_full Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
title_fullStr Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in Australia
title_sort genetic identification of sharks traded and consumed in australia
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.25949/19438667.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Genetic_identification_of_sharks_traded_and_consumed_in_Australia/19438667
geographic New Zealand
geographic_facet New Zealand
genre Antarc*
antarcticus
genre_facet Antarc*
antarcticus
op_relation doi:10.25949/19438667.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Genetic_identification_of_sharks_traded_and_consumed_in_Australia/19438667
op_rights In Copyright
op_doi https://doi.org/10.25949/19438667.v1
_version_ 1766146540557041664