Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations

The biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council has developed pan-Arctic biodiversity monitoring plans to improve our ability to detect, understand and report on long-term change in Arctic biodiversity. The Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was identified as a target of future monitoring because of i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Berteaux, Dominique, Thierry, Anne-Mathilde, Alisauskas, Ray, Angerbjörn, Anders, Buchel, Eric, Doronina, Liliya, Ehrich, Dorothee, Eide, Nina, Erlandsson, Rasmus, Flagstad, Oystein, Fuglei, Eva, Gilg, Olivier, Goltsman, Mikhail, Henttonen, Heikki, Ims, Rolf, Killengreen, Siw, Kondratyev, Alexander, Kruchenkova, Elena, Kruckenberg, Helmut, Kulikova, Olga, Landa, Arild, Lang, Johannes, Menyushina, Irina, Mikhnevich, Julia, Niemimaa, Jukka, Noren, Karin, Ollila, Tuomo, Ovsyanikov, Nikita, Pokrovskaya, Liya, Pokrovsky, Ivan, Rodnikova, Anna, Roth, James, Sabard, Brigitte, Samelius, Gustaf, Schmidt, Niels, Sittler, Benoit, Sokolov, Aleksandr, Sokolova, Natalya, Stickney, Alice, Unnsteinsdottir, Ester Rut, White, Paula
Other Authors: Universite du Quebec a Rimouski, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Environment Canada. Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre, Stockholm University, Arctic Ecology Research Group, University of Munster, Lomonosov Moscow State University, The Arctic University of Tromso, Norwegian Polar Research Institute, Universite Bourgogne Franche-Comte, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Waterbird & Wetlands Research, Institute of Plant & Animal Ecology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Metsähallitus, Max Planck Society, University of Manitoba, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University, University of Freiburg, Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, Islandic Institute of Natural History, University of California Los Angeles, Luke / Luonnonvarat ja biotuotanto / Ekosysteemit ja ekologia / Metsä- ja eläinekologia (4100100316), 4100100316
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540880
id ftluke:oai:jukuri.luke.fi:10024/540880
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Natural Resources Institute Finland: Jukuri
op_collection_id ftluke
language English
topic arktinen alue
naali
biodiversiteetti
Arctic region
biodiversity
Alopex lagopus
biodiversity assessment
biodiversity indicator
spellingShingle arktinen alue
naali
biodiversiteetti
Arctic region
biodiversity
Alopex lagopus
biodiversity assessment
biodiversity indicator
Berteaux, Dominique
Thierry, Anne-Mathilde
Alisauskas, Ray
Angerbjörn, Anders
Buchel, Eric
Doronina, Liliya
Ehrich, Dorothee
Eide, Nina
Erlandsson, Rasmus
Flagstad, Oystein
Fuglei, Eva
Gilg, Olivier
Goltsman, Mikhail
Henttonen, Heikki
Ims, Rolf
Killengreen, Siw
Kondratyev, Alexander
Kruchenkova, Elena
Kruckenberg, Helmut
Kulikova, Olga
Landa, Arild
Lang, Johannes
Menyushina, Irina
Mikhnevich, Julia
Niemimaa, Jukka
Noren, Karin
Ollila, Tuomo
Ovsyanikov, Nikita
Pokrovskaya, Liya
Pokrovsky, Ivan
Rodnikova, Anna
Roth, James
Sabard, Brigitte
Samelius, Gustaf
Schmidt, Niels
Sittler, Benoit
Sokolov, Aleksandr
Sokolova, Natalya
Stickney, Alice
Unnsteinsdottir, Ester Rut
White, Paula
Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
topic_facet arktinen alue
naali
biodiversiteetti
Arctic region
biodiversity
Alopex lagopus
biodiversity assessment
biodiversity indicator
description The biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council has developed pan-Arctic biodiversity monitoring plans to improve our ability to detect, understand and report on long-term change in Arctic biodiversity. The Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was identified as a target of future monitoring because of its circumpolar distribution, ecological importance and reliance on Arctic ecosystems. We provide the first exhaustive survey of contemporary Arctic fox monitoring programmes, describing 34 projects located in eight countries. Monitored populations covered equally the four climate zones of the species' distribution, and there were large differences between populations in long-term trends, multi-annual fluctuations, diet composition, degree of competition with red fox and human interferences. Den density, number of active dens, number of breeding dens and litter size were assessed in almost all populations, while projects varied greatly with respect to monitoring of other variables indicative of population status, ecosystem state or ecosystem function. We review the benefits, opportunities and challenges to increased integration of monitoring projects. We argue that better harmonizing protocols of data collection and data management would allow new questions to be addressed while adding tremendous value to individual projects. However, despite many opportunities, challenges remain. We offer six recommendations that represent decisive progress toward a better integration of Arctic fox monitoring projects. Further, our work serves as a template that can be used to integrate monitoring efforts of other species, thereby providing a key step for future assessments of global biodiversity. 2017
author2 Universite du Quebec a Rimouski
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Environment Canada. Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre
Stockholm University
Arctic Ecology Research Group
University of Munster
Lomonosov Moscow State University
The Arctic University of Tromso
Norwegian Polar Research Institute
Universite Bourgogne Franche-Comte
Russian Academy of Sciences
Institute for Waterbird & Wetlands Research
Institute of Plant & Animal Ecology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Justus Liebig University Giessen
Metsähallitus
Max Planck Society
University of Manitoba
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Aarhus University
University of Freiburg
Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District
Islandic Institute of Natural History
University of California Los Angeles
Luke / Luonnonvarat ja biotuotanto / Ekosysteemit ja ekologia / Metsä- ja eläinekologia (4100100316)
4100100316
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Berteaux, Dominique
Thierry, Anne-Mathilde
Alisauskas, Ray
Angerbjörn, Anders
Buchel, Eric
Doronina, Liliya
Ehrich, Dorothee
Eide, Nina
Erlandsson, Rasmus
Flagstad, Oystein
Fuglei, Eva
Gilg, Olivier
Goltsman, Mikhail
Henttonen, Heikki
Ims, Rolf
Killengreen, Siw
Kondratyev, Alexander
Kruchenkova, Elena
Kruckenberg, Helmut
Kulikova, Olga
Landa, Arild
Lang, Johannes
Menyushina, Irina
Mikhnevich, Julia
Niemimaa, Jukka
Noren, Karin
Ollila, Tuomo
Ovsyanikov, Nikita
Pokrovskaya, Liya
Pokrovsky, Ivan
Rodnikova, Anna
Roth, James
Sabard, Brigitte
Samelius, Gustaf
Schmidt, Niels
Sittler, Benoit
Sokolov, Aleksandr
Sokolova, Natalya
Stickney, Alice
Unnsteinsdottir, Ester Rut
White, Paula
author_facet Berteaux, Dominique
Thierry, Anne-Mathilde
Alisauskas, Ray
Angerbjörn, Anders
Buchel, Eric
Doronina, Liliya
Ehrich, Dorothee
Eide, Nina
Erlandsson, Rasmus
Flagstad, Oystein
Fuglei, Eva
Gilg, Olivier
Goltsman, Mikhail
Henttonen, Heikki
Ims, Rolf
Killengreen, Siw
Kondratyev, Alexander
Kruchenkova, Elena
Kruckenberg, Helmut
Kulikova, Olga
Landa, Arild
Lang, Johannes
Menyushina, Irina
Mikhnevich, Julia
Niemimaa, Jukka
Noren, Karin
Ollila, Tuomo
Ovsyanikov, Nikita
Pokrovskaya, Liya
Pokrovsky, Ivan
Rodnikova, Anna
Roth, James
Sabard, Brigitte
Samelius, Gustaf
Schmidt, Niels
Sittler, Benoit
Sokolov, Aleksandr
Sokolova, Natalya
Stickney, Alice
Unnsteinsdottir, Ester Rut
White, Paula
author_sort Berteaux, Dominique
title Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
title_short Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
title_full Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
title_fullStr Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
title_sort harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations
publisher Taylor & Francis
url http://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540880
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic Council
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Arktinen alue
Polar Research
Vulpes lagopus
naali
genre_facet Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Arctic biodiversity
Arctic Council
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Arktinen alue
Polar Research
Vulpes lagopus
naali
op_relation Arctic Fox Biology and Management
Polar Research
doi:10.1080/17518369.2017.1319602
0800-0395
Sup. 1
36
http://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540880
1751-8369
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2017.1319602
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 36
container_issue sup1
container_start_page 2
_version_ 1779310104974196736
spelling ftluke:oai:jukuri.luke.fi:10024/540880 2023-10-09T21:44:23+02:00 Harmonizing circumpolar monitoring of Arctic fox: benefits, opportunities, challenges and recommendations Berteaux, Dominique Thierry, Anne-Mathilde Alisauskas, Ray Angerbjörn, Anders Buchel, Eric Doronina, Liliya Ehrich, Dorothee Eide, Nina Erlandsson, Rasmus Flagstad, Oystein Fuglei, Eva Gilg, Olivier Goltsman, Mikhail Henttonen, Heikki Ims, Rolf Killengreen, Siw Kondratyev, Alexander Kruchenkova, Elena Kruckenberg, Helmut Kulikova, Olga Landa, Arild Lang, Johannes Menyushina, Irina Mikhnevich, Julia Niemimaa, Jukka Noren, Karin Ollila, Tuomo Ovsyanikov, Nikita Pokrovskaya, Liya Pokrovsky, Ivan Rodnikova, Anna Roth, James Sabard, Brigitte Samelius, Gustaf Schmidt, Niels Sittler, Benoit Sokolov, Aleksandr Sokolova, Natalya Stickney, Alice Unnsteinsdottir, Ester Rut White, Paula Universite du Quebec a Rimouski Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Environment Canada. Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre Stockholm University Arctic Ecology Research Group University of Munster Lomonosov Moscow State University The Arctic University of Tromso Norwegian Polar Research Institute Universite Bourgogne Franche-Comte Russian Academy of Sciences Institute for Waterbird & Wetlands Research Institute of Plant & Animal Ecology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Justus Liebig University Giessen Metsähallitus Max Planck Society University of Manitoba Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Aarhus University University of Freiburg Arctic Research Center of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District Islandic Institute of Natural History University of California Los Angeles Luke / Luonnonvarat ja biotuotanto / Ekosysteemit ja ekologia / Metsä- ja eläinekologia (4100100316) 4100100316 Verkkojulkaisu false http://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540880 eng eng Taylor & Francis Arctic Fox Biology and Management Polar Research doi:10.1080/17518369.2017.1319602 0800-0395 Sup. 1 36 http://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/540880 1751-8369 arktinen alue naali biodiversiteetti Arctic region biodiversity Alopex lagopus biodiversity assessment biodiversity indicator fi=A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä|sv=A1 Originalartikel i en vetenskaplig tidskrift|en=A1 Journal article (refereed), original research| ftluke https://doi.org/10.1080/17518369.2017.1319602 2023-09-12T20:26:27Z The biodiversity working group of the Arctic Council has developed pan-Arctic biodiversity monitoring plans to improve our ability to detect, understand and report on long-term change in Arctic biodiversity. The Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) was identified as a target of future monitoring because of its circumpolar distribution, ecological importance and reliance on Arctic ecosystems. We provide the first exhaustive survey of contemporary Arctic fox monitoring programmes, describing 34 projects located in eight countries. Monitored populations covered equally the four climate zones of the species' distribution, and there were large differences between populations in long-term trends, multi-annual fluctuations, diet composition, degree of competition with red fox and human interferences. Den density, number of active dens, number of breeding dens and litter size were assessed in almost all populations, while projects varied greatly with respect to monitoring of other variables indicative of population status, ecosystem state or ecosystem function. We review the benefits, opportunities and challenges to increased integration of monitoring projects. We argue that better harmonizing protocols of data collection and data management would allow new questions to be addressed while adding tremendous value to individual projects. However, despite many opportunities, challenges remain. We offer six recommendations that represent decisive progress toward a better integration of Arctic fox monitoring projects. Further, our work serves as a template that can be used to integrate monitoring efforts of other species, thereby providing a key step for future assessments of global biodiversity. 2017 Article in Journal/Newspaper Alopex lagopus Arctic Arctic biodiversity Arctic Council Arctic Fox Arctic Arktinen alue Polar Research Vulpes lagopus naali Natural Resources Institute Finland: Jukuri Arctic Polar Research 36 sup1 2