Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry

Tephrochronology commonly relies upon grain-discrete analysis of glass shards to reveal the subtle geochemical differences between tephras from past explosive volcanic eruptions. The use of electron probe microanalysis for this purpose is widely accepted by tephrochronologists. In addition, it is re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hunt, J. B., Clift, P. D., Lacasse, C., Vallier, T. L., Werner, R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: LSU Digital Commons 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/540
https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/context/geo_pubs/article/1539/viewcontent/540.PDF
id ftlouisianastuir:oai:digitalcommons.lsu.edu:geo_pubs-1539
record_format openpolar
spelling ftlouisianastuir:oai:digitalcommons.lsu.edu:geo_pubs-1539 2023-06-11T04:14:42+02:00 Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry Hunt, J. B. Clift, P. D. Lacasse, C. Vallier, T. L. Werner, R. 1998-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/540 https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998 https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/context/geo_pubs/article/1539/viewcontent/540.PDF unknown LSU Digital Commons https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/540 doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998 https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/context/geo_pubs/article/1539/viewcontent/540.PDF Faculty Publications text 1998 ftlouisianastuir https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998 2023-05-28T18:23:56Z Tephrochronology commonly relies upon grain-discrete analysis of glass shards to reveal the subtle geochemical differences between tephras from past explosive volcanic eruptions. The use of electron probe microanalysis for this purpose is widely accepted by tephrochronologists. In addition, it is recognized widely that both precision and accuracy must be maximized, and that rigorous standardization procedures must be followed. In this paper, the performance of five electron microprobe centers used in the analysis of glass sharts from Leg 152 tephras is compared, using a geochemically homogeneous obsidian secondary standard. The results reveal the compatibility of most of the participatnats, supporting the comparability of additional glass geochemistry presented within this volume. In recent years the apoplication of distal tephrochronology to stratigrpahical problems in the North Atlantic Quaternary record has become increasingly common. Geochemical standardization is vitally important at an early stage in the development of tephrochronological frameworks, and it is hoped that exercises such as that presented here will encourage the production of reliable tephra geochemical data, both on Ocean Drilling Program exercises and wider afield. Text North Atlantic LSU Digital Commons (Louisiana State University)
institution Open Polar
collection LSU Digital Commons (Louisiana State University)
op_collection_id ftlouisianastuir
language unknown
description Tephrochronology commonly relies upon grain-discrete analysis of glass shards to reveal the subtle geochemical differences between tephras from past explosive volcanic eruptions. The use of electron probe microanalysis for this purpose is widely accepted by tephrochronologists. In addition, it is recognized widely that both precision and accuracy must be maximized, and that rigorous standardization procedures must be followed. In this paper, the performance of five electron microprobe centers used in the analysis of glass sharts from Leg 152 tephras is compared, using a geochemically homogeneous obsidian secondary standard. The results reveal the compatibility of most of the participatnats, supporting the comparability of additional glass geochemistry presented within this volume. In recent years the apoplication of distal tephrochronology to stratigrpahical problems in the North Atlantic Quaternary record has become increasingly common. Geochemical standardization is vitally important at an early stage in the development of tephrochronological frameworks, and it is hoped that exercises such as that presented here will encourage the production of reliable tephra geochemical data, both on Ocean Drilling Program exercises and wider afield.
format Text
author Hunt, J. B.
Clift, P. D.
Lacasse, C.
Vallier, T. L.
Werner, R.
spellingShingle Hunt, J. B.
Clift, P. D.
Lacasse, C.
Vallier, T. L.
Werner, R.
Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
author_facet Hunt, J. B.
Clift, P. D.
Lacasse, C.
Vallier, T. L.
Werner, R.
author_sort Hunt, J. B.
title Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
title_short Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
title_full Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
title_fullStr Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
title_full_unstemmed Interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
title_sort interlaboratory comparison of electron probe microanalysis of glass geochemistry
publisher LSU Digital Commons
publishDate 1998
url https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/540
https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/context/geo_pubs/article/1539/viewcontent/540.PDF
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Faculty Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/geo_pubs/540
doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998
https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/context/geo_pubs/article/1539/viewcontent/540.PDF
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.152.244.1998
_version_ 1768370909192650752