Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process
This thesis investigates the choice of award mechanism and the process of implementing the award of contracts in public procurement. Public procurement is an activity conducted by the public sector to purchase goods and services. Government spending on public procurement accounts for 10% to 25% of G...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Public_procurement_award_mechanisms_and_implementation_process/9496370 |
id |
ftloughboroughun:oai:figshare.com:article/9496370 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftloughboroughun:oai:figshare.com:article/9496370 2023-05-15T16:52:07+02:00 Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process Chusu He 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Public_procurement_award_mechanisms_and_implementation_process/9496370 unknown 2134/35792 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Public_procurement_award_mechanisms_and_implementation_process/9496370 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 CC-BY-NC-ND Business and Management not elsewhere classified untagged Text Thesis 2018 ftloughboroughun 2022-01-01T19:39:41Z This thesis investigates the choice of award mechanism and the process of implementing the award of contracts in public procurement. Public procurement is an activity conducted by the public sector to purchase goods and services. Government spending on public procurement accounts for 10% to 25% of GDP in each country (World Bank Group, 2017). Because of its large sharing in government expenditure, public procurement can shed light on important practical policy issues, including those as investigated here: the choice of award mechanism (i.e. the process for selecting contractors); the possibility of costly delays in awarding contracts; and the concern that corruption may lead to inefficient outcomes. This thesis uses public procurement data for the UK and other EU countries plus Iceland and Norway. These countries adopt the same benchmark award mechanisms (the EU benchmark award mechanisms). The EU benchmark award mechanisms are implementations of the award mechanisms defined by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), which influences the award mechanism arrangement in 88 countries. There are four EU benchmark award mechanisms: the open procedure, the restricted procedure, the negotiated procedure and the competitive dialogue. Few empirical studies have investigated these EU benchmark award mechanisms. This thesis contains three independent and interrelated studies. The first study examines the choice of award mechanism in the UK, using the logit model. The results show that UK public buyers choose award mechanisms that are consistent with the theoretical suggestions. When a contract is complex, a UK public buyer is likely to employ an award mechanism that allows for greater discretion of selection. It also provides evidence that public buyer's experience is an important factor in award mechanism choice. Also based on UK data, the second study compares the decision speed of awarding a contract, using the logit model and survival analysis. It uncovers that delay in contract ... Thesis Iceland Loughborough University: Figshare Norway |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Loughborough University: Figshare |
op_collection_id |
ftloughboroughun |
language |
unknown |
topic |
Business and Management not elsewhere classified untagged |
spellingShingle |
Business and Management not elsewhere classified untagged Chusu He Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
topic_facet |
Business and Management not elsewhere classified untagged |
description |
This thesis investigates the choice of award mechanism and the process of implementing the award of contracts in public procurement. Public procurement is an activity conducted by the public sector to purchase goods and services. Government spending on public procurement accounts for 10% to 25% of GDP in each country (World Bank Group, 2017). Because of its large sharing in government expenditure, public procurement can shed light on important practical policy issues, including those as investigated here: the choice of award mechanism (i.e. the process for selecting contractors); the possibility of costly delays in awarding contracts; and the concern that corruption may lead to inefficient outcomes. This thesis uses public procurement data for the UK and other EU countries plus Iceland and Norway. These countries adopt the same benchmark award mechanisms (the EU benchmark award mechanisms). The EU benchmark award mechanisms are implementations of the award mechanisms defined by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), which influences the award mechanism arrangement in 88 countries. There are four EU benchmark award mechanisms: the open procedure, the restricted procedure, the negotiated procedure and the competitive dialogue. Few empirical studies have investigated these EU benchmark award mechanisms. This thesis contains three independent and interrelated studies. The first study examines the choice of award mechanism in the UK, using the logit model. The results show that UK public buyers choose award mechanisms that are consistent with the theoretical suggestions. When a contract is complex, a UK public buyer is likely to employ an award mechanism that allows for greater discretion of selection. It also provides evidence that public buyer's experience is an important factor in award mechanism choice. Also based on UK data, the second study compares the decision speed of awarding a contract, using the logit model and survival analysis. It uncovers that delay in contract ... |
format |
Thesis |
author |
Chusu He |
author_facet |
Chusu He |
author_sort |
Chusu He |
title |
Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
title_short |
Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
title_full |
Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
title_fullStr |
Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
title_full_unstemmed |
Public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
title_sort |
public procurement: award mechanisms and implementation process |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Public_procurement_award_mechanisms_and_implementation_process/9496370 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
2134/35792 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Public_procurement_award_mechanisms_and_implementation_process/9496370 |
op_rights |
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY-NC-ND |
_version_ |
1766042247106658304 |