Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker

This thesis studies mainstream British political drama staged during the late 1960s, the 1970s and early 1980s. It considers the work of Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker through a close textual analysis of a carefully selected number of their p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin H. Peacock
Format: Thesis
Language:unknown
Published: 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Five_approaches_to_political_theatre_Howard_Brenton_David_Hare_David_Edgar_Roger_Howard_Caryl_Churchill_and_Howard_Barker/9325124
id ftloughboroughun:oai:figshare.com:article/9325124
record_format openpolar
spelling ftloughboroughun:oai:figshare.com:article/9325124 2023-05-15T18:43:55+02:00 Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker Martin H. Peacock 1990-01-01T00:00:00Z https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Five_approaches_to_political_theatre_Howard_Brenton_David_Hare_David_Edgar_Roger_Howard_Caryl_Churchill_and_Howard_Barker/9325124 unknown 2134/7045 https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Five_approaches_to_political_theatre_Howard_Brenton_David_Hare_David_Edgar_Roger_Howard_Caryl_Churchill_and_Howard_Barker/9325124 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 CC-BY-NC-ND Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified Literature Political theatre Text Thesis 1990 ftloughboroughun 2022-01-01T19:15:03Z This thesis studies mainstream British political drama staged during the late 1960s, the 1970s and early 1980s. It considers the work of Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker through a close textual analysis of a carefully selected number of their plays. Throughout my concern has been to, firstly, consider the relationship between dramatic form and political content; secondly, the dynamic relationship between dramatic content and the cultural and political environment of Britain since 1968; and thirdly, the use of history as a means of addressing contemporary issues. The first chapter is a discussion of Christie in Love (196R), Revenge (1969), Hitler Dances (1972), Magnificence (1973) and The Churchill Play (1974). It charts Brenton's developing dramatic and political perspectives. With reference to the ideology of the French Situationists I question the effectiveness of an anarchic or agitational approach to political theatre. In the second chapter David Hare's Plenty (1978) and David Edgar's Maydays (1983) are discussed. Using the named plays as examples and with passing reference to John Osborne's Look Back in Anger (1956) I consider how Edgar and Hare attempt to utilize the realistic and naturalistic conventions of the bourgeois theatre to dramatize the personal and political experience of post-war British and European history. The third chapter discusses David Edgar's Destiny (1976) and Roger Howard's White Sea (1978) by using the theory and practice of Brecht's theatre as a starting point: it considers how Edgar and Howard attempt to focus the attention of the audience upon the political, rather than the personal, dynamics of historical and contemporary experience. In Chapter IV, through a detailed analysis of Caryl Churchill's Light Shining in Buckinghamshire (1976) and Roger Howard's Siege (1980), I examine the reasons for, and resulting problems of, the dramatization of historical subject matter. In particular I consider how language is used towards the ... Thesis White Sea Loughborough University: Figshare Bourgeois ENVELOPE(-66.996,-66.996,-67.628,-67.628) White Sea
institution Open Polar
collection Loughborough University: Figshare
op_collection_id ftloughboroughun
language unknown
topic Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified
Literature
Political theatre
spellingShingle Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified
Literature
Political theatre
Martin H. Peacock
Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
topic_facet Studies in the Creative Arts and Writing not elsewhere classified
Literature
Political theatre
description This thesis studies mainstream British political drama staged during the late 1960s, the 1970s and early 1980s. It considers the work of Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker through a close textual analysis of a carefully selected number of their plays. Throughout my concern has been to, firstly, consider the relationship between dramatic form and political content; secondly, the dynamic relationship between dramatic content and the cultural and political environment of Britain since 1968; and thirdly, the use of history as a means of addressing contemporary issues. The first chapter is a discussion of Christie in Love (196R), Revenge (1969), Hitler Dances (1972), Magnificence (1973) and The Churchill Play (1974). It charts Brenton's developing dramatic and political perspectives. With reference to the ideology of the French Situationists I question the effectiveness of an anarchic or agitational approach to political theatre. In the second chapter David Hare's Plenty (1978) and David Edgar's Maydays (1983) are discussed. Using the named plays as examples and with passing reference to John Osborne's Look Back in Anger (1956) I consider how Edgar and Hare attempt to utilize the realistic and naturalistic conventions of the bourgeois theatre to dramatize the personal and political experience of post-war British and European history. The third chapter discusses David Edgar's Destiny (1976) and Roger Howard's White Sea (1978) by using the theory and practice of Brecht's theatre as a starting point: it considers how Edgar and Howard attempt to focus the attention of the audience upon the political, rather than the personal, dynamics of historical and contemporary experience. In Chapter IV, through a detailed analysis of Caryl Churchill's Light Shining in Buckinghamshire (1976) and Roger Howard's Siege (1980), I examine the reasons for, and resulting problems of, the dramatization of historical subject matter. In particular I consider how language is used towards the ...
format Thesis
author Martin H. Peacock
author_facet Martin H. Peacock
author_sort Martin H. Peacock
title Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
title_short Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
title_full Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
title_fullStr Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
title_full_unstemmed Five approaches to political theatre: Howard Brenton, David Hare, David Edgar, Roger Howard, Caryl Churchill and Howard Barker
title_sort five approaches to political theatre: howard brenton, david hare, david edgar, roger howard, caryl churchill and howard barker
publishDate 1990
url https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Five_approaches_to_political_theatre_Howard_Brenton_David_Hare_David_Edgar_Roger_Howard_Caryl_Churchill_and_Howard_Barker/9325124
long_lat ENVELOPE(-66.996,-66.996,-67.628,-67.628)
geographic Bourgeois
White Sea
geographic_facet Bourgeois
White Sea
genre White Sea
genre_facet White Sea
op_relation 2134/7045
https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Five_approaches_to_political_theatre_Howard_Brenton_David_Hare_David_Edgar_Roger_Howard_Caryl_Churchill_and_Howard_Barker/9325124
op_rights CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
_version_ 1766234461065707520