Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environment...
Published in: | Current Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/ https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 |
id |
ftliverpooljmu:oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:11143 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftliverpooljmu:oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:11143 2023-05-15T13:48:52+02:00 Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers Mariani, S Baillie, C Colosimo, G Riesgo, A 2019-06-03 text http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/ https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 en eng Elsevier https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf Mariani, S, Baillie, C, Colosimo, G and Riesgo, A (2019) Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Current Biology, 29 (11). R401-R402. ISSN 0960-9822 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 cc_by CC-BY GE Environmental Sciences QH Natural history QH426 Genetics Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftliverpooljmu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 2022-01-09T06:55:37Z At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environmental DNA’ (eDNA) [1]. In trying to circumvent the many challenges associated with water filtration and DNA isolation from environmental samples, significant investment is being made in high-tech solutions, such as automated underwater vehicles and robots [2]. Here, instead, we explored a simpler, alternative option, based on the recovery of eDNA from sponges (phylum Porifera), the planet’s most effective water-filterers. We obtained sponge samples from Mediterranean and Antarctic surveys, extracted total DNA from their tissues, and obtained tens of thousands of fish DNA reads via metabarcoding, which were able to clearly distinguish samples from the two regions. One Antarctic sample yielded hundreds of reads from chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii). We argue that this ‘natural sampler DNA’ (nsDNA) approach is poised to become a powerful, affordable, universal tool for aquatic biodiversity monitoring globally. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic antarcticus Chinstrap penguin Weddell Seal Liverpool John Moores University: LJMU Research Online Antarctic Weddell Current Biology 29 11 R401 R402 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Liverpool John Moores University: LJMU Research Online |
op_collection_id |
ftliverpooljmu |
language |
English |
topic |
GE Environmental Sciences QH Natural history QH426 Genetics |
spellingShingle |
GE Environmental Sciences QH Natural history QH426 Genetics Mariani, S Baillie, C Colosimo, G Riesgo, A Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
topic_facet |
GE Environmental Sciences QH Natural history QH426 Genetics |
description |
At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environmental DNA’ (eDNA) [1]. In trying to circumvent the many challenges associated with water filtration and DNA isolation from environmental samples, significant investment is being made in high-tech solutions, such as automated underwater vehicles and robots [2]. Here, instead, we explored a simpler, alternative option, based on the recovery of eDNA from sponges (phylum Porifera), the planet’s most effective water-filterers. We obtained sponge samples from Mediterranean and Antarctic surveys, extracted total DNA from their tissues, and obtained tens of thousands of fish DNA reads via metabarcoding, which were able to clearly distinguish samples from the two regions. One Antarctic sample yielded hundreds of reads from chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii). We argue that this ‘natural sampler DNA’ (nsDNA) approach is poised to become a powerful, affordable, universal tool for aquatic biodiversity monitoring globally. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Mariani, S Baillie, C Colosimo, G Riesgo, A |
author_facet |
Mariani, S Baillie, C Colosimo, G Riesgo, A |
author_sort |
Mariani, S |
title |
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
title_short |
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
title_full |
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
title_fullStr |
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers |
title_sort |
sponges as natural environmental dna samplers |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/ https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 |
geographic |
Antarctic Weddell |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Weddell |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic antarcticus Chinstrap penguin Weddell Seal |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic antarcticus Chinstrap penguin Weddell Seal |
op_relation |
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf Mariani, S, Baillie, C, Colosimo, G and Riesgo, A (2019) Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Current Biology, 29 (11). R401-R402. ISSN 0960-9822 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 |
op_rights |
cc_by |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 |
container_title |
Current Biology |
container_volume |
29 |
container_issue |
11 |
container_start_page |
R401 |
op_container_end_page |
R402 |
_version_ |
1766249904960700416 |