Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers

At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current Biology
Main Authors: Mariani, S, Baillie, C, Colosimo, G, Riesgo, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031
id ftliverpooljmu:oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:11143
record_format openpolar
spelling ftliverpooljmu:oai:researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk:11143 2023-05-15T13:48:52+02:00 Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers Mariani, S Baillie, C Colosimo, G Riesgo, A 2019-06-03 text http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/ https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 en eng Elsevier https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf Mariani, S, Baillie, C, Colosimo, G and Riesgo, A (2019) Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Current Biology, 29 (11). R401-R402. ISSN 0960-9822 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 cc_by CC-BY GE Environmental Sciences QH Natural history QH426 Genetics Article PeerReviewed 2019 ftliverpooljmu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031 2022-01-09T06:55:37Z At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environmental DNA’ (eDNA) [1]. In trying to circumvent the many challenges associated with water filtration and DNA isolation from environmental samples, significant investment is being made in high-tech solutions, such as automated underwater vehicles and robots [2]. Here, instead, we explored a simpler, alternative option, based on the recovery of eDNA from sponges (phylum Porifera), the planet’s most effective water-filterers. We obtained sponge samples from Mediterranean and Antarctic surveys, extracted total DNA from their tissues, and obtained tens of thousands of fish DNA reads via metabarcoding, which were able to clearly distinguish samples from the two regions. One Antarctic sample yielded hundreds of reads from chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii). We argue that this ‘natural sampler DNA’ (nsDNA) approach is poised to become a powerful, affordable, universal tool for aquatic biodiversity monitoring globally. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic antarcticus Chinstrap penguin Weddell Seal Liverpool John Moores University: LJMU Research Online Antarctic Weddell Current Biology 29 11 R401 R402
institution Open Polar
collection Liverpool John Moores University: LJMU Research Online
op_collection_id ftliverpooljmu
language English
topic GE Environmental Sciences
QH Natural history
QH426 Genetics
spellingShingle GE Environmental Sciences
QH Natural history
QH426 Genetics
Mariani, S
Baillie, C
Colosimo, G
Riesgo, A
Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
topic_facet GE Environmental Sciences
QH Natural history
QH426 Genetics
description At a time of unprecedented impacts on marine biodiversity, scientists are rapidly becoming persuaded by the potential of screening large swathes of the oceans through the retrieval, amplification and sequencing of trace DNA fragments left behind by marine organisms; an approach known as ‘environmental DNA’ (eDNA) [1]. In trying to circumvent the many challenges associated with water filtration and DNA isolation from environmental samples, significant investment is being made in high-tech solutions, such as automated underwater vehicles and robots [2]. Here, instead, we explored a simpler, alternative option, based on the recovery of eDNA from sponges (phylum Porifera), the planet’s most effective water-filterers. We obtained sponge samples from Mediterranean and Antarctic surveys, extracted total DNA from their tissues, and obtained tens of thousands of fish DNA reads via metabarcoding, which were able to clearly distinguish samples from the two regions. One Antarctic sample yielded hundreds of reads from chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii). We argue that this ‘natural sampler DNA’ (nsDNA) approach is poised to become a powerful, affordable, universal tool for aquatic biodiversity monitoring globally.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Mariani, S
Baillie, C
Colosimo, G
Riesgo, A
author_facet Mariani, S
Baillie, C
Colosimo, G
Riesgo, A
author_sort Mariani, S
title Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
title_short Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
title_full Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
title_fullStr Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
title_full_unstemmed Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers
title_sort sponges as natural environmental dna samplers
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2019
url http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/
https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031
geographic Antarctic
Weddell
geographic_facet Antarctic
Weddell
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
antarcticus
Chinstrap penguin
Weddell Seal
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
antarcticus
Chinstrap penguin
Weddell Seal
op_relation https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/11143/1/Mariani%20et%20al%202019%20CurrBiol.pdf
Mariani, S, Baillie, C, Colosimo, G and Riesgo, A (2019) Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Current Biology, 29 (11). R401-R402. ISSN 0960-9822
doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031
op_rights cc_by
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.031
container_title Current Biology
container_volume 29
container_issue 11
container_start_page R401
op_container_end_page R402
_version_ 1766249904960700416