Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?

Populations of the internationally protected Black Stork Ciconia nigra in the northern parts of the distribution range, located to the east of the Baltic Sea, have suffered decline over recent decades. Since early 1990s, however, logging intensity has increased. In this paper, considering a ten-year...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Forest Research
Main Authors: Treinys, Rimgaudas, Mozgeris, Gintautas, Skuja, Saulis
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vu.lvb.lt/VU:ELABAPDB19777339&prefLang=en_US
id ftlithuaniansrc:oai:elaba:19777339
record_format openpolar
spelling ftlithuaniansrc:oai:elaba:19777339 2023-05-15T18:44:07+02:00 Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork? Treinys, Rimgaudas Mozgeris, Gintautas Skuja, Saulis 2016 http://vu.lvb.lt/VU:ELABAPDB19777339&prefLang=en_US eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10342-016-1003-6 http://vu.lvb.lt/VU:ELABAPDB19777339&prefLang=en_US European journal of forest research, New York : Springer New York, 2016, Vol. 135, Iss. 6, p. 1175-1186 ISSN 1612-4669 eISSN 1612-4677 Nest site Nest tree Macrohabitat Conservation Habitat preference info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2016 ftlithuaniansrc https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1003-6 2021-12-02T00:13:29Z Populations of the internationally protected Black Stork Ciconia nigra in the northern parts of the distribution range, located to the east of the Baltic Sea, have suffered decline over recent decades. Since early 1990s, however, logging intensity has increased. In this paper, considering a ten-year period from the mid-1990s, we ask: (a) Did changes occur in the habitat preferred by Black Stork in the decade? (b) did the decade of intensified forestry significantly change forest characteristics? and (c) could the intensified forestry explain any observed changes in the utilization of habitat by storks? We compared forest characteristics at the beginning and end of this period at 75 random points and compared the habitat at 75 nest sites occupied by the Black Stork in the mid-1990s and 75 occupied nest sites at the end of the 2000s. In the 0.7-km zones around the random points, the abundance of mature stands decreased between the mid-1990s and the end of the 2000s, as did the abundance of broadleaved trees, but black alders increased. Nevertheless, the age and composition of tree species within the stands around the random points remained similar. Some changes were noted though in the habitat around nests used by Black Storks during two periods, with the data indicating that the Black Storks tended to occupy sites of better habitat quality (e.g. with a higher density of hydrological network and old oak trees, older nest stands) at the end of the 2000s than in the mid- 1990s. Our results, however, do not support the idea that intensified forestry over the short term induced changes in the habitat used by the Black Storks. It is possible that nesting Black Storks became concentrated into the prime habitat when population retracted and/or abandoned habitat where recently recovered by the White-tailed Eagle. Article in Journal/Newspaper White-tailed eagle LSRC VL (Lithuanian Social Research Centre Virtual Library) European Journal of Forest Research 135 6 1175 1186
institution Open Polar
collection LSRC VL (Lithuanian Social Research Centre Virtual Library)
op_collection_id ftlithuaniansrc
language English
topic Nest site
Nest tree
Macrohabitat
Conservation
Habitat preference
spellingShingle Nest site
Nest tree
Macrohabitat
Conservation
Habitat preference
Treinys, Rimgaudas
Mozgeris, Gintautas
Skuja, Saulis
Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
topic_facet Nest site
Nest tree
Macrohabitat
Conservation
Habitat preference
description Populations of the internationally protected Black Stork Ciconia nigra in the northern parts of the distribution range, located to the east of the Baltic Sea, have suffered decline over recent decades. Since early 1990s, however, logging intensity has increased. In this paper, considering a ten-year period from the mid-1990s, we ask: (a) Did changes occur in the habitat preferred by Black Stork in the decade? (b) did the decade of intensified forestry significantly change forest characteristics? and (c) could the intensified forestry explain any observed changes in the utilization of habitat by storks? We compared forest characteristics at the beginning and end of this period at 75 random points and compared the habitat at 75 nest sites occupied by the Black Stork in the mid-1990s and 75 occupied nest sites at the end of the 2000s. In the 0.7-km zones around the random points, the abundance of mature stands decreased between the mid-1990s and the end of the 2000s, as did the abundance of broadleaved trees, but black alders increased. Nevertheless, the age and composition of tree species within the stands around the random points remained similar. Some changes were noted though in the habitat around nests used by Black Storks during two periods, with the data indicating that the Black Storks tended to occupy sites of better habitat quality (e.g. with a higher density of hydrological network and old oak trees, older nest stands) at the end of the 2000s than in the mid- 1990s. Our results, however, do not support the idea that intensified forestry over the short term induced changes in the habitat used by the Black Storks. It is possible that nesting Black Storks became concentrated into the prime habitat when population retracted and/or abandoned habitat where recently recovered by the White-tailed Eagle.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Treinys, Rimgaudas
Mozgeris, Gintautas
Skuja, Saulis
author_facet Treinys, Rimgaudas
Mozgeris, Gintautas
Skuja, Saulis
author_sort Treinys, Rimgaudas
title Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
title_short Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
title_full Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
title_fullStr Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
title_full_unstemmed Can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling Black Stork?
title_sort can intensified forestry be responsible for changes in habitat usage by the forest-dwelling black stork?
publishDate 2016
url http://vu.lvb.lt/VU:ELABAPDB19777339&prefLang=en_US
genre White-tailed eagle
genre_facet White-tailed eagle
op_source European journal of forest research, New York : Springer New York, 2016, Vol. 135, Iss. 6, p. 1175-1186
ISSN 1612-4669
eISSN 1612-4677
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10342-016-1003-6
http://vu.lvb.lt/VU:ELABAPDB19777339&prefLang=en_US
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1003-6
container_title European Journal of Forest Research
container_volume 135
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1175
op_container_end_page 1186
_version_ 1766234676207288320