Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica

Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sheppard, A. J.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Lincoln College, University of Canterbury 1986
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578
id ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/4578
record_format openpolar
spelling ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/4578 2024-09-15T17:41:48+00:00 Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica Sheppard, A. J. 1986 https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 en eng Lincoln College, University of Canterbury https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 Q112848487 https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available. Antarctica mineral resource mining Antarctic Treaty resource management ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management Thesis 1986 ftlincolnuniv 2024-07-09T23:40:58Z Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the possible impacts of any mining and the risks involved in exploitation. The special features of resource management at the International level are investigated. This analysis points to the fact that a lack of clearly defined sovereign jurisdiction In Antarctica means that there is no authoritative and effectively institutionalised procedures for the resolution of conflicts. The process of decision-making is identified as being pivotal in resolving conflicts over mineral use and in determining a good outcome for the minerals. Decision-making within the Antarctic Treaty is faulty and will not resolve problems over the use of the mineral resource. A process involving universal participation in policy making is identified as providing the best framework within which to deal with the minerals issue. Thesis Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive
institution Open Polar
collection Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive
op_collection_id ftlincolnuniv
language English
topic Antarctica
mineral resource
mining
Antarctic Treaty
resource management
ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management
ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management
spellingShingle Antarctica
mineral resource
mining
Antarctic Treaty
resource management
ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management
ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management
Sheppard, A. J.
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
topic_facet Antarctica
mineral resource
mining
Antarctic Treaty
resource management
ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management
ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management
description Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the possible impacts of any mining and the risks involved in exploitation. The special features of resource management at the International level are investigated. This analysis points to the fact that a lack of clearly defined sovereign jurisdiction In Antarctica means that there is no authoritative and effectively institutionalised procedures for the resolution of conflicts. The process of decision-making is identified as being pivotal in resolving conflicts over mineral use and in determining a good outcome for the minerals. Decision-making within the Antarctic Treaty is faulty and will not resolve problems over the use of the mineral resource. A process involving universal participation in policy making is identified as providing the best framework within which to deal with the minerals issue.
format Thesis
author Sheppard, A. J.
author_facet Sheppard, A. J.
author_sort Sheppard, A. J.
title Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
title_short Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
title_full Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
title_fullStr Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
title_sort uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in antarctica
publisher Lincoln College, University of Canterbury
publishDate 1986
url https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_relation https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578
Q112848487
op_rights https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights
Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available.
_version_ 1810488049933484032