Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica
Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lincoln College, University of Canterbury
1986
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 |
id |
ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/4578 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/4578 2024-09-15T17:41:48+00:00 Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica Sheppard, A. J. 1986 https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 en eng Lincoln College, University of Canterbury https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 Q112848487 https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available. Antarctica mineral resource mining Antarctic Treaty resource management ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management Thesis 1986 ftlincolnuniv 2024-07-09T23:40:58Z Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the possible impacts of any mining and the risks involved in exploitation. The special features of resource management at the International level are investigated. This analysis points to the fact that a lack of clearly defined sovereign jurisdiction In Antarctica means that there is no authoritative and effectively institutionalised procedures for the resolution of conflicts. The process of decision-making is identified as being pivotal in resolving conflicts over mineral use and in determining a good outcome for the minerals. Decision-making within the Antarctic Treaty is faulty and will not resolve problems over the use of the mineral resource. A process involving universal participation in policy making is identified as providing the best framework within which to deal with the minerals issue. Thesis Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive |
op_collection_id |
ftlincolnuniv |
language |
English |
topic |
Antarctica mineral resource mining Antarctic Treaty resource management ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management |
spellingShingle |
Antarctica mineral resource mining Antarctic Treaty resource management ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management Sheppard, A. J. Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
topic_facet |
Antarctica mineral resource mining Antarctic Treaty resource management ANZSRC::050209 Natural Resource Management ANZSRC::050205 Environmental Management |
description |
Increasing interest in the exploitation of the mineral resources of Antarctica, has raised questions about how the minerals should be managed and who should make those decisions. This study investigates these issues by examining the major conflicts over the minerals, the extent of the resource, the possible impacts of any mining and the risks involved in exploitation. The special features of resource management at the International level are investigated. This analysis points to the fact that a lack of clearly defined sovereign jurisdiction In Antarctica means that there is no authoritative and effectively institutionalised procedures for the resolution of conflicts. The process of decision-making is identified as being pivotal in resolving conflicts over mineral use and in determining a good outcome for the minerals. Decision-making within the Antarctic Treaty is faulty and will not resolve problems over the use of the mineral resource. A process involving universal participation in policy making is identified as providing the best framework within which to deal with the minerals issue. |
format |
Thesis |
author |
Sheppard, A. J. |
author_facet |
Sheppard, A. J. |
author_sort |
Sheppard, A. J. |
title |
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
title_short |
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
title_full |
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
title_fullStr |
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in Antarctica |
title_sort |
uncommon heritage : issues in the management of minerals in antarctica |
publisher |
Lincoln College, University of Canterbury |
publishDate |
1986 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
op_relation |
https://hdl.handle.net/10182/4578 Q112848487 |
op_rights |
https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/pages/rights Digital thesis can be viewed by current staff and students of Lincoln University only. If you are the author of this item, please contact us if you wish to discuss making the full text publicly available. |
_version_ |
1810488049933484032 |