A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea

Human activities, including tourism, in the Polar Regions are increasing and diversifying. The most common mode of transport in support of polar tourism is by cruise ship. At the same time, we are witnessing a rapid increase in the number of small vessels, such as yachts, exploring the Polar Regions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liggett, D., Stewart, Emma
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10977
id ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/10977
record_format openpolar
spelling ftlincolnuniv:oai:researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz:10182/10977 2024-06-09T07:40:20+00:00 A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea Liggett, D. Stewart, Emma 103-104 https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10977 en eng The original publication is available from - https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/uploads/images/Our-Future-in-Focus-Conference-Handbook-Digital.pdf https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10977 New Zealand Antarctic Science Conference 2019 marine tourism Antarctic Arctic Canada Ross Sea Conference Contribution - published ftlincolnuniv 2024-05-15T08:11:43Z Human activities, including tourism, in the Polar Regions are increasing and diversifying. The most common mode of transport in support of polar tourism is by cruise ship. At the same time, we are witnessing a rapid increase in the number of small vessels, such as yachts, exploring the Polar Regions. From a political and legal perspective, operating cruises to the Arctic and Antarctic is highly complex. In order to better understand whether the current regulatory mechanisms are sufficient for the rapidly changing nature of Polar marine tourism activities, this poster presents the results of a desk-based analysis of the regulatory landscape in two contrasting case studies. Our first case study focuses on Arctic Canada, where significant regulatory complexity currently represents significant barriers to entry for new tourism operators. The second case study we explore is marine tourism to the Ross Sea region, where a short season and the destinations remoteness limit the number of operators. Tourism here, and across the entire Antarctic region, is subject to high-level regulation under the Antarctic Treaty System as enacted by national jurisdictions. The interplay of international regulation through, e.g., the IMOs Polar Code or UNCLOS, with national policies is the focus of our examination. Other/Unknown Material Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Arctic Ross Sea Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive Antarctic Arctic Canada Ross Sea The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Lincoln University (New Zealand): Lincoln U Research Archive
op_collection_id ftlincolnuniv
language English
topic marine
tourism
Antarctic
Arctic Canada
Ross Sea
spellingShingle marine
tourism
Antarctic
Arctic Canada
Ross Sea
Liggett, D.
Stewart, Emma
A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
topic_facet marine
tourism
Antarctic
Arctic Canada
Ross Sea
description Human activities, including tourism, in the Polar Regions are increasing and diversifying. The most common mode of transport in support of polar tourism is by cruise ship. At the same time, we are witnessing a rapid increase in the number of small vessels, such as yachts, exploring the Polar Regions. From a political and legal perspective, operating cruises to the Arctic and Antarctic is highly complex. In order to better understand whether the current regulatory mechanisms are sufficient for the rapidly changing nature of Polar marine tourism activities, this poster presents the results of a desk-based analysis of the regulatory landscape in two contrasting case studies. Our first case study focuses on Arctic Canada, where significant regulatory complexity currently represents significant barriers to entry for new tourism operators. The second case study we explore is marine tourism to the Ross Sea region, where a short season and the destinations remoteness limit the number of operators. Tourism here, and across the entire Antarctic region, is subject to high-level regulation under the Antarctic Treaty System as enacted by national jurisdictions. The interplay of international regulation through, e.g., the IMOs Polar Code or UNCLOS, with national policies is the focus of our examination.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Liggett, D.
Stewart, Emma
author_facet Liggett, D.
Stewart, Emma
author_sort Liggett, D.
title A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
title_short A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
title_full A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in Arctic Canada and the Ross Sea
title_sort comparative analysis of regulatory instruments for managing marine-based tourism in arctic canada and the ross sea
url https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10977
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
Canada
Ross Sea
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
Canada
Ross Sea
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Arctic
Ross Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Arctic
Ross Sea
op_source New Zealand Antarctic Science Conference 2019
op_relation The original publication is available from - https://www.antarcticanz.govt.nz/uploads/images/Our-Future-in-Focus-Conference-Handbook-Digital.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/10182/10977
_version_ 1801383764807385088