Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter

The file associated with this record is under embargo until six months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above. Coherent‐scatter, high‐frequency, phased‐array radars create narrow beam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radio Science
Main Authors: Burrell, Angeline G., Perry, Gareth W., Yeoman, Timothy K., Milan, Stephen E. Milan, Stoneback, Russell
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU),Wiley, International Union of Radio Science 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017RS006512
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42700
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512
id ftleicester:oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/42700
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of Leicester: Leicester Research Archive (LRA)
op_collection_id ftleicester
language English
topic Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Technology
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Geochemistry & Geophysics
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Remote Sensing
Telecommunications
high-frequency radar
SuperDARN
ground backscatter
long-term variations
groundscatter
ionospheric propagation
HF-RADARS
NETWORK SUPERDARN
spellingShingle Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Technology
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Geochemistry & Geophysics
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Remote Sensing
Telecommunications
high-frequency radar
SuperDARN
ground backscatter
long-term variations
groundscatter
ionospheric propagation
HF-RADARS
NETWORK SUPERDARN
Burrell, Angeline G.
Perry, Gareth W.
Yeoman, Timothy K.
Milan, Stephen E. Milan
Stoneback, Russell
Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
topic_facet Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Technology
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Geochemistry & Geophysics
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Remote Sensing
Telecommunications
high-frequency radar
SuperDARN
ground backscatter
long-term variations
groundscatter
ionospheric propagation
HF-RADARS
NETWORK SUPERDARN
description The file associated with this record is under embargo until six months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above. Coherent‐scatter, high‐frequency, phased‐array radars create narrow beams through the use of constructive and destructive interference patterns. This formation method leads to the creation of a secondary beam, or lobe, that is sent out behind the radar. This study investigates the relative importance of the beams in front of and behind the high‐frequency radar located in Hankasalmi, Finland, using observations taken over a solar cycle, as well as coincident observations from Hankasalmi and the Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe Radio Receiver Instrument. These observations show that the relative strength of the front and rear beams is frequency dependent, with the relative amount of power sent to the front lobe increasing with increasing frequency. At the range of frequencies used by Hankasalmi, both front and rear beams are always present, though the main beam is always stronger than the rear lobe. Because signals are always transmitted to the front and rear of the radar, it is always possible to receive backscatter from both return directions. Examining the return direction as a function of local time, season, and solar cycle shows that the dominant return direction depends primarily on the local ionospheric structure. Diurnal changes in plasma density typically cause an increase in the amount of groundscatter returning from the rear lobe at night, though the strength of this variation has a seasonal dependence. Solar cycle variations are also seen in the groundscatter return direction, modifying the existing local time and seasonal variations. A. G. Burrell, S. E. Milan, and T. K. Yeoman were supported by NERC grant NE/K011766/1. The research at the University of Calgary was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant Program and Discovery Accelerator Supplement Program. The development and operations of the CASSIOPE/e-POP mission were supported by the Industrial Technologies Office (ITO), Canadian Space Agency (CSA), and MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates (MDA), respectively. R. Stoneback was supported by NSF grant 1259508. e-POP RRI data can be accessed at http://epop-data.phys.ucalgary.ca. The authors acknowledge the use of IDL GEOPACK DLM in the production of the RRI data products used in this work. The authors acknowledge the use of SuperDARN data. SuperDARN is a collection of radars funded by the national scientific funding agencies of Australia, Canada, China, France, Italy, Japan, Norway, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Virginia Tech SuperDARN database (described at http://vt.superdarn.org/) provides up-to-date public access to the Hankasalmi observations, which were analyzed with the aid of DaViTpy. We acknowledge use of NASA/GSFC’s Space Physics Data Facility’s OMNIWeb service and OMNI data. Galactic Cosmic Ray data were obtained from the Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory at http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi. GPS TEC data products and access through the Madrigal distributed data system are provided to the community by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology under support from U.S. National Science Foundation grant AGS-1242204. Data for the TEC processing is provided by the following organizations: UNAVCO, Scripps Orbit and Permanent Array Center, Institut Geographique National, France, International GNSS Service, The Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS), National Geodetic Survey, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, RAMSAC CORS of Instituto Geográfico Nacional del la República Agentina, Arecibo Observatory, Low-Latitude Ionospheric Sensor Network (LISN), Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc., Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Meterorology Administration, Centro di Ricerche Sismogiche, Système d’Observation du Niveau des Eaux Littorales (SONEL), RENAG : REseau NAtional GPS permanent, and GeoNet— the official source of geological hazard information for New Zealand. Peer-reviewed Publisher Version
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Burrell, Angeline G.
Perry, Gareth W.
Yeoman, Timothy K.
Milan, Stephen E. Milan
Stoneback, Russell
author_facet Burrell, Angeline G.
Perry, Gareth W.
Yeoman, Timothy K.
Milan, Stephen E. Milan
Stoneback, Russell
author_sort Burrell, Angeline G.
title Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
title_short Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
title_full Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
title_fullStr Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
title_full_unstemmed Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter
title_sort solar influences on the return direction of high-frequency radar backscatter
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU),Wiley, International Union of Radio Science
publishDate 2018
url https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017RS006512
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42700
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512
long_lat ENVELOPE(-63.783,-63.783,-69.150,-69.150)
ENVELOPE(144.232,144.232,59.863,59.863)
geographic Arctic
Canada
Norway
New Zealand
Scripps
Omni
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
Norway
New Zealand
Scripps
Omni
genre Arctic
Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network
genre_facet Arctic
Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network
op_relation http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000434170100016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=8c4e325952a993be76947405d4bce7d5
Radio Science, 2018, 53 (4), pp. 577-597 (21)
0048-6604
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017RS006512
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42700
doi:10.1002/2017RS006512
1944-799X
op_rights Copyright © 2018, American Geophysical Union (AGU),Wiley, International Union of Radio Science. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512
container_title Radio Science
container_volume 53
container_issue 4
container_start_page 577
op_container_end_page 597
_version_ 1766350444562481152
spelling ftleicester:oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/42700 2023-05-15T15:20:13+02:00 Solar Influences on the Return Direction of High-Frequency Radar Backscatter Burrell, Angeline G. Perry, Gareth W. Yeoman, Timothy K. Milan, Stephen E. Milan Stoneback, Russell 2018-08-15T10:57:17Z https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017RS006512 http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42700 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512 en eng American Geophysical Union (AGU),Wiley, International Union of Radio Science http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000434170100016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=8c4e325952a993be76947405d4bce7d5 Radio Science, 2018, 53 (4), pp. 577-597 (21) 0048-6604 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017RS006512 http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42700 doi:10.1002/2017RS006512 1944-799X Copyright © 2018, American Geophysical Union (AGU),Wiley, International Union of Radio Science. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy. (http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved) Science & Technology Physical Sciences Technology Astronomy & Astrophysics Geochemistry & Geophysics Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences Remote Sensing Telecommunications high-frequency radar SuperDARN ground backscatter long-term variations groundscatter ionospheric propagation HF-RADARS NETWORK SUPERDARN Journal Article Article;Journal 2018 ftleicester https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RS006512 2019-03-22T20:25:39Z The file associated with this record is under embargo until six months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above. Coherent‐scatter, high‐frequency, phased‐array radars create narrow beams through the use of constructive and destructive interference patterns. This formation method leads to the creation of a secondary beam, or lobe, that is sent out behind the radar. This study investigates the relative importance of the beams in front of and behind the high‐frequency radar located in Hankasalmi, Finland, using observations taken over a solar cycle, as well as coincident observations from Hankasalmi and the Enhanced Polar Outflow Probe Radio Receiver Instrument. These observations show that the relative strength of the front and rear beams is frequency dependent, with the relative amount of power sent to the front lobe increasing with increasing frequency. At the range of frequencies used by Hankasalmi, both front and rear beams are always present, though the main beam is always stronger than the rear lobe. Because signals are always transmitted to the front and rear of the radar, it is always possible to receive backscatter from both return directions. Examining the return direction as a function of local time, season, and solar cycle shows that the dominant return direction depends primarily on the local ionospheric structure. Diurnal changes in plasma density typically cause an increase in the amount of groundscatter returning from the rear lobe at night, though the strength of this variation has a seasonal dependence. Solar cycle variations are also seen in the groundscatter return direction, modifying the existing local time and seasonal variations. A. G. Burrell, S. E. Milan, and T. K. Yeoman were supported by NERC grant NE/K011766/1. The research at the University of Calgary was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant Program and Discovery Accelerator Supplement Program. The development and operations of the CASSIOPE/e-POP mission were supported by the Industrial Technologies Office (ITO), Canadian Space Agency (CSA), and MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates (MDA), respectively. R. Stoneback was supported by NSF grant 1259508. e-POP RRI data can be accessed at http://epop-data.phys.ucalgary.ca. The authors acknowledge the use of IDL GEOPACK DLM in the production of the RRI data products used in this work. The authors acknowledge the use of SuperDARN data. SuperDARN is a collection of radars funded by the national scientific funding agencies of Australia, Canada, China, France, Italy, Japan, Norway, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Virginia Tech SuperDARN database (described at http://vt.superdarn.org/) provides up-to-date public access to the Hankasalmi observations, which were analyzed with the aid of DaViTpy. We acknowledge use of NASA/GSFC’s Space Physics Data Facility’s OMNIWeb service and OMNI data. Galactic Cosmic Ray data were obtained from the Sodankyla Geophysical Observatory at http://cosmicrays.oulu.fi. GPS TEC data products and access through the Madrigal distributed data system are provided to the community by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology under support from U.S. National Science Foundation grant AGS-1242204. Data for the TEC processing is provided by the following organizations: UNAVCO, Scripps Orbit and Permanent Array Center, Institut Geographique National, France, International GNSS Service, The Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS), National Geodetic Survey, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, RAMSAC CORS of Instituto Geográfico Nacional del la República Agentina, Arecibo Observatory, Low-Latitude Ionospheric Sensor Network (LISN), Topcon Positioning Systems, Inc., Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Meterorology Administration, Centro di Ricerche Sismogiche, Système d’Observation du Niveau des Eaux Littorales (SONEL), RENAG : REseau NAtional GPS permanent, and GeoNet— the official source of geological hazard information for New Zealand. Peer-reviewed Publisher Version Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network University of Leicester: Leicester Research Archive (LRA) Arctic Canada Norway New Zealand Scripps ENVELOPE(-63.783,-63.783,-69.150,-69.150) Omni ENVELOPE(144.232,144.232,59.863,59.863) Radio Science 53 4 577 597