Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants

The replacement of conventional lighting with energy‐saving light emitting diodes (LED) is a worldwide trend, yet its consequences for animals and ecosystems are poorly understood. Strictly nocturnal animals such as bats are particularly sensitive to artificial light at night (ALAN). Past studies ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Voigt, Christian, Rehnig, Katharina, Lindecke, Oliver, Pētersons, Gunārs
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6415157
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194273/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.4400#support-information-section
id ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:oxNxDYsBBwLIz6xGq1gW
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:oxNxDYsBBwLIz6xGq1gW 2023-11-05T03:44:39+01:00 Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants Voigt, Christian Rehnig, Katharina Lindecke, Oliver Pētersons, Gunārs 2018 https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6415157 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194273/ https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.4400#support-information-section eng eng http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Ecology and evolution, 2018(8):9353-9361 conservation light pollution aviation lighting bat migration phototaxis animal orientation wind turbines 2018 ftleibnizopen https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400 2023-10-08T23:09:37Z The replacement of conventional lighting with energy‐saving light emitting diodes (LED) is a worldwide trend, yet its consequences for animals and ecosystems are poorly understood. Strictly nocturnal animals such as bats are particularly sensitive to artificial light at night (ALAN). Past studies have shown that bats, in general, respond to ALAN according to the emitted light color and that migratory bats, in particular, exhibit phototaxis in response to green light. As red and white light is frequently used in outdoor lighting, we asked how migratory bats respond to these wavelength spectra. At a major migration corridor, we recorded the presence of migrating bats based on ultrasonic recorders during 10‐min light‐on/light‐off intervals to red or warm‐white LED, interspersed with dark controls. When the red LED was switched on, we observed an increase in flight activity for Pipistrellus pygmaeus and a trend for a higher activity for Pipistrellus nathusii. As the higher flight activity of bats was not associated with increased feeding, we rule out the possibility that bats foraged at the red LED light. Instead, bats may have flown toward the red LED light source. When exposed to warm‐white LED, general flight activity at the light source did not increase, yet we observed an increased foraging activity directly at the light source compared to the dark control. Our findings highlight a response of migratory bats toward LED light that was dependent on light color. The most parsimonious explanation for the response to red LED is phototaxis and for the response to warm‐white LED foraging. Our findings call for caution in the application of red aviation lighting, particularly at wind turbines, as this light color might attract bats, leading eventually to an increased collision risk of migratory bats at wind turbines. Other/Unknown Material Pipistrellus nathusii LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association) Ecology and Evolution 8 18 9353 9361
institution Open Polar
collection LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association)
op_collection_id ftleibnizopen
language English
topic conservation
light pollution
aviation lighting
bat migration
phototaxis
animal orientation
wind turbines
spellingShingle conservation
light pollution
aviation lighting
bat migration
phototaxis
animal orientation
wind turbines
Voigt, Christian
Rehnig, Katharina
Lindecke, Oliver
Pētersons, Gunārs
Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
topic_facet conservation
light pollution
aviation lighting
bat migration
phototaxis
animal orientation
wind turbines
description The replacement of conventional lighting with energy‐saving light emitting diodes (LED) is a worldwide trend, yet its consequences for animals and ecosystems are poorly understood. Strictly nocturnal animals such as bats are particularly sensitive to artificial light at night (ALAN). Past studies have shown that bats, in general, respond to ALAN according to the emitted light color and that migratory bats, in particular, exhibit phototaxis in response to green light. As red and white light is frequently used in outdoor lighting, we asked how migratory bats respond to these wavelength spectra. At a major migration corridor, we recorded the presence of migrating bats based on ultrasonic recorders during 10‐min light‐on/light‐off intervals to red or warm‐white LED, interspersed with dark controls. When the red LED was switched on, we observed an increase in flight activity for Pipistrellus pygmaeus and a trend for a higher activity for Pipistrellus nathusii. As the higher flight activity of bats was not associated with increased feeding, we rule out the possibility that bats foraged at the red LED light. Instead, bats may have flown toward the red LED light source. When exposed to warm‐white LED, general flight activity at the light source did not increase, yet we observed an increased foraging activity directly at the light source compared to the dark control. Our findings highlight a response of migratory bats toward LED light that was dependent on light color. The most parsimonious explanation for the response to red LED is phototaxis and for the response to warm‐white LED foraging. Our findings call for caution in the application of red aviation lighting, particularly at wind turbines, as this light color might attract bats, leading eventually to an increased collision risk of migratory bats at wind turbines.
author Voigt, Christian
Rehnig, Katharina
Lindecke, Oliver
Pētersons, Gunārs
author_facet Voigt, Christian
Rehnig, Katharina
Lindecke, Oliver
Pētersons, Gunārs
author_sort Voigt, Christian
title Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
title_short Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
title_full Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
title_fullStr Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
title_full_unstemmed Migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: Implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
title_sort migratory bats are attracted by red light but not by warm‐white light: implications for the protection of nocturnal migrants
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.publisso.de/resource/frl:6415157
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6194273/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.4400#support-information-section
genre Pipistrellus nathusii
genre_facet Pipistrellus nathusii
op_source Ecology and evolution, 2018(8):9353-9361
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4400
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 8
container_issue 18
container_start_page 9353
op_container_end_page 9361
_version_ 1781705057844068352