S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts

The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cohen, Judah, Coumou, Dim, Hwang, Jessica, Mackey, Lester, Orenstein, Paulo, Totz, Sonja, Tziperman, Eli
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell 2018
Subjects:
550
Online Access:https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10248
https://doi.org/10.34657/9284
id ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:LPVC-IYBdbrxVwz6BrQe
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:LPVC-IYBdbrxVwz6BrQe 2023-05-15T15:11:16+02:00 S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts Cohen, Judah Coumou, Dim Hwang, Jessica Mackey, Lester Orenstein, Paulo Totz, Sonja Tziperman, Eli 2018 application/pdf https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10248 https://doi.org/10.34657/9284 eng eng Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell CC BY 4.0 Unported https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change 10 (2019), Nr. 2 climate prediction machine learning polar vortex unsupervised learning 550 article Text 2018 ftleibnizopen https://doi.org/10.34657/9284 2023-03-20T00:27:50Z The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state-of-the-art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real-time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid-winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid-latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association)
op_collection_id ftleibnizopen
language English
topic climate prediction
machine learning
polar vortex
unsupervised learning
550
spellingShingle climate prediction
machine learning
polar vortex
unsupervised learning
550
Cohen, Judah
Coumou, Dim
Hwang, Jessica
Mackey, Lester
Orenstein, Paulo
Totz, Sonja
Tziperman, Eli
S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
topic_facet climate prediction
machine learning
polar vortex
unsupervised learning
550
description The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state-of-the-art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real-time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid-winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid-latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cohen, Judah
Coumou, Dim
Hwang, Jessica
Mackey, Lester
Orenstein, Paulo
Totz, Sonja
Tziperman, Eli
author_facet Cohen, Judah
Coumou, Dim
Hwang, Jessica
Mackey, Lester
Orenstein, Paulo
Totz, Sonja
Tziperman, Eli
author_sort Cohen, Judah
title S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_short S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_full S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_fullStr S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_full_unstemmed S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
title_sort s2s reboot: an argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts
publisher Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell
publishDate 2018
url https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/10248
https://doi.org/10.34657/9284
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change 10 (2019), Nr. 2
op_rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.34657/9284
_version_ 1766342150757285888