Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget

Climate warming affects permafrost soil carbon pools in two opposing ways: enhanced vegetation growth leads to higher carbon inputs to the soil, whereas permafrost melting accelerates decomposition and hence carbon release. Here, we study the spatial and temporal dynamics of these two processes unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schaphoff, Sibyll, Heyder, Ursula, Ostberg, Sebastian, Gerten, Dieter, Heinke, Jens, Lucht, Wolfgang
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Bristol : IOP Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.34657/237
https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3845
_version_ 1821679702826287104
author Schaphoff, Sibyll
Heyder, Ursula
Ostberg, Sebastian
Gerten, Dieter
Heinke, Jens
Lucht, Wolfgang
author_facet Schaphoff, Sibyll
Heyder, Ursula
Ostberg, Sebastian
Gerten, Dieter
Heinke, Jens
Lucht, Wolfgang
author_sort Schaphoff, Sibyll
collection LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association)
description Climate warming affects permafrost soil carbon pools in two opposing ways: enhanced vegetation growth leads to higher carbon inputs to the soil, whereas permafrost melting accelerates decomposition and hence carbon release. Here, we study the spatial and temporal dynamics of these two processes under scenarios of climate change and evaluate their influence on the carbon balance of the permafrost zone. We use the dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL, which simulates plant physiological and ecological processes and includes a newly developed discrete layer energy balance permafrost module and a vertical carbon distribution within the soil layer. The model is able to reproduce the interactions between vegetation and soil carbon dynamics as well as to simulate dynamic permafrost changes resulting from changes in the climate. We find that vegetation responds more rapidly to warming of the permafrost zone than soil carbon pools due to long time lags in permafrost thawing, and that the initial simulated net uptake of carbon may continue for some decades of warming. However, once the turning point is reached, if carbon release exceeds uptake, carbon is lost irreversibly from the system and cannot be compensated for by increasing vegetation carbon input. Our analysis highlights the importance of including dynamic vegetation and long-term responses into analyses of permafrost zone carbon budgets. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
id ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:20GWhIgBdbrxVwz6izOb
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftleibnizopen
op_doi https://doi.org/10.34657/237
op_rights CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Unported
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Volume 8, Issue 1
publishDate 2013
publisher Bristol : IOP Publishing
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleibnizopen:oai:oai.leibnizopen.de:20GWhIgBdbrxVwz6izOb 2025-01-17T00:12:39+00:00 Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget Schaphoff, Sibyll Heyder, Ursula Ostberg, Sebastian Gerten, Dieter Heinke, Jens Lucht, Wolfgang 2013 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.34657/237 https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3845 eng eng Bristol : IOP Publishing CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 Unported https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Environmental Research Letters, Volume 8, Issue 1 Climate change dynamic global vegetation model permafrost soil carbon 500 article Text 2013 ftleibnizopen https://doi.org/10.34657/237 2023-06-04T23:15:55Z Climate warming affects permafrost soil carbon pools in two opposing ways: enhanced vegetation growth leads to higher carbon inputs to the soil, whereas permafrost melting accelerates decomposition and hence carbon release. Here, we study the spatial and temporal dynamics of these two processes under scenarios of climate change and evaluate their influence on the carbon balance of the permafrost zone. We use the dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL, which simulates plant physiological and ecological processes and includes a newly developed discrete layer energy balance permafrost module and a vertical carbon distribution within the soil layer. The model is able to reproduce the interactions between vegetation and soil carbon dynamics as well as to simulate dynamic permafrost changes resulting from changes in the climate. We find that vegetation responds more rapidly to warming of the permafrost zone than soil carbon pools due to long time lags in permafrost thawing, and that the initial simulated net uptake of carbon may continue for some decades of warming. However, once the turning point is reached, if carbon release exceeds uptake, carbon is lost irreversibly from the system and cannot be compensated for by increasing vegetation carbon input. Our analysis highlights the importance of including dynamic vegetation and long-term responses into analyses of permafrost zone carbon budgets. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost LeibnizOpen (The Leibniz Association)
spellingShingle Climate change
dynamic global vegetation model
permafrost
soil carbon
500
Schaphoff, Sibyll
Heyder, Ursula
Ostberg, Sebastian
Gerten, Dieter
Heinke, Jens
Lucht, Wolfgang
Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title_full Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title_fullStr Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title_short Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
title_sort contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget
topic Climate change
dynamic global vegetation model
permafrost
soil carbon
500
topic_facet Climate change
dynamic global vegetation model
permafrost
soil carbon
500
url https://doi.org/10.34657/237
https://oa.tib.eu/renate/handle/123456789/3845