Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?

When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Main Authors: Zuo, J, Webb, AAG, Chin, EJ, Ackerman, L, Harvey, J, Haproff, PJ, Müller, T, Wang, Q, Hickman, AH, Sorger, D, Ramírez‐Salazar, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/1/Geochem%20Geophys%20Geosyst%20-%202022%20-%20Zuo%20-%20Earth%20s%20Earliest%20Phaneritic%20Ultramafic%20Rocks%20%20Mantle%20Slices%20or%20Crustal%20Cumulates.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gc010519
id ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:194355
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:194355 2023-05-15T16:29:53+02:00 Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates? Zuo, J Webb, AAG Chin, EJ Ackerman, L Harvey, J Haproff, PJ Müller, T Wang, Q Hickman, AH Sorger, D Ramírez‐Salazar, A 2022-12 text https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/ https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/1/Geochem%20Geophys%20Geosyst%20-%202022%20-%20Zuo%20-%20Earth%20s%20Earliest%20Phaneritic%20Ultramafic%20Rocks%20%20Mantle%20Slices%20or%20Crustal%20Cumulates.pdf https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gc010519 en eng American Geophysical Union (AGU) https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/1/Geochem%20Geophys%20Geosyst%20-%202022%20-%20Zuo%20-%20Earth%20s%20Earliest%20Phaneritic%20Ultramafic%20Rocks%20%20Mantle%20Slices%20or%20Crustal%20Cumulates.pdf Zuo, J, Webb, AAG, Chin, EJ et al. (8 more authors) (2022) Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23 (12). e2022GC010519. cc_by_nc_nd_4 CC-BY-NC-ND Article NonPeerReviewed 2022 ftleedsuniv https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gc010519 2023-01-30T22:51:32Z When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction-related, tectonically-exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non-plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt-enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite-spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole-rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low-Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically-exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co-genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non-plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York) Greenland Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 23 12
institution Open Polar
collection White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
op_collection_id ftleedsuniv
language English
description When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant-lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction-related, tectonically-exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non-plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt-enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite-spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole-rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low-Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically-exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co-genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non-plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zuo, J
Webb, AAG
Chin, EJ
Ackerman, L
Harvey, J
Haproff, PJ
Müller, T
Wang, Q
Hickman, AH
Sorger, D
Ramírez‐Salazar, A
spellingShingle Zuo, J
Webb, AAG
Chin, EJ
Ackerman, L
Harvey, J
Haproff, PJ
Müller, T
Wang, Q
Hickman, AH
Sorger, D
Ramírez‐Salazar, A
Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
author_facet Zuo, J
Webb, AAG
Chin, EJ
Ackerman, L
Harvey, J
Haproff, PJ
Müller, T
Wang, Q
Hickman, AH
Sorger, D
Ramírez‐Salazar, A
author_sort Zuo, J
title Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_short Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_full Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_fullStr Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_full_unstemmed Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
title_sort earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: mantle slices or crustal cumulates?
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2022
url https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/1/Geochem%20Geophys%20Geosyst%20-%202022%20-%20Zuo%20-%20Earth%20s%20Earliest%20Phaneritic%20Ultramafic%20Rocks%20%20Mantle%20Slices%20or%20Crustal%20Cumulates.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gc010519
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/194355/1/Geochem%20Geophys%20Geosyst%20-%202022%20-%20Zuo%20-%20Earth%20s%20Earliest%20Phaneritic%20Ultramafic%20Rocks%20%20Mantle%20Slices%20or%20Crustal%20Cumulates.pdf
Zuo, J, Webb, AAG, Chin, EJ et al. (8 more authors) (2022) Earth’s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks: Mantle slices or crustal cumulates? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23 (12). e2022GC010519.
op_rights cc_by_nc_nd_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gc010519
container_title Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
container_volume 23
container_issue 12
_version_ 1766019585115422720