Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation

A commonly used family of statistical magnetic field models is based on a giant Gaussian process (GGP), which assumes each Gauss coefficient can be realized from an independent normal distribution. GGP models are capable of generating suites of plausible Gauss coefficients, allowing for palaeomagnet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bono, RK, Biggin, AJ, Holme, R, Davies, CJ, Meduri, DG, Bestard, J
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/1/2020GC008960.pdf
id ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:164243
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:164243 2023-05-15T16:19:40+02:00 Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation Bono, RK Biggin, AJ Holme, R Davies, CJ Meduri, DG Bestard, J 2020-08 text https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/ https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/1/2020GC008960.pdf en eng American Geophysical Union (AGU) https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/1/2020GC008960.pdf Bono, RK, Biggin, AJ, Holme, R et al. (3 more authors) (2020) Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (8). e2020GC008960. ISSN 1525-2027 cc_by_4 CC-BY Article NonPeerReviewed 2020 ftleedsuniv 2023-01-30T22:31:57Z A commonly used family of statistical magnetic field models is based on a giant Gaussian process (GGP), which assumes each Gauss coefficient can be realized from an independent normal distribution. GGP models are capable of generating suites of plausible Gauss coefficients, allowing for palaeomagnetic data to be tested against the expected distribution arising from a time‐averaged geomagnetic field. However, existing GGP models do not simultaneously reproduce the distribution of field strength and palaeosecular variation estimates reported for the past 10 million years and tend to underpredict virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) dispersion at high latitudes unless trade‐offs are made to the fit at lower latitudes. Here we introduce a new family of GGP models, BB18 and BB18.Z3 (the latter includes non‐zero‐mean zonal terms for spherical harmonic degrees 2 and 3). Our models are distinct from prior GGP models by simultaneously treating the axial dipole variance separately from higher degree terms, applying an odd‐even variance structure, and incorporating a covariance between certain Gauss coefficients. Covariance between Gauss coefficients, a property both expected from dynamo theory and observed in numerical dynamo simulations, has not previously been included in GGP models. Introducing covariance between certain Gauss coefficients inferred from an ensemble of “Earth‐like” dynamo simulations and predicted by theory yields a reduced misfit to VGP dispersion, allowing for GGP models which generate improved reproductions of the distribution of field strengths and palaeosecular variation observed for the last 10 million years. Article in Journal/Newspaper Geomagnetic Pole White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
institution Open Polar
collection White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
op_collection_id ftleedsuniv
language English
description A commonly used family of statistical magnetic field models is based on a giant Gaussian process (GGP), which assumes each Gauss coefficient can be realized from an independent normal distribution. GGP models are capable of generating suites of plausible Gauss coefficients, allowing for palaeomagnetic data to be tested against the expected distribution arising from a time‐averaged geomagnetic field. However, existing GGP models do not simultaneously reproduce the distribution of field strength and palaeosecular variation estimates reported for the past 10 million years and tend to underpredict virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) dispersion at high latitudes unless trade‐offs are made to the fit at lower latitudes. Here we introduce a new family of GGP models, BB18 and BB18.Z3 (the latter includes non‐zero‐mean zonal terms for spherical harmonic degrees 2 and 3). Our models are distinct from prior GGP models by simultaneously treating the axial dipole variance separately from higher degree terms, applying an odd‐even variance structure, and incorporating a covariance between certain Gauss coefficients. Covariance between Gauss coefficients, a property both expected from dynamo theory and observed in numerical dynamo simulations, has not previously been included in GGP models. Introducing covariance between certain Gauss coefficients inferred from an ensemble of “Earth‐like” dynamo simulations and predicted by theory yields a reduced misfit to VGP dispersion, allowing for GGP models which generate improved reproductions of the distribution of field strengths and palaeosecular variation observed for the last 10 million years.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bono, RK
Biggin, AJ
Holme, R
Davies, CJ
Meduri, DG
Bestard, J
spellingShingle Bono, RK
Biggin, AJ
Holme, R
Davies, CJ
Meduri, DG
Bestard, J
Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
author_facet Bono, RK
Biggin, AJ
Holme, R
Davies, CJ
Meduri, DG
Bestard, J
author_sort Bono, RK
title Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
title_short Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
title_full Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
title_fullStr Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
title_full_unstemmed Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation
title_sort covariant giant gaussian process models with improved reproduction of palaeosecular variation
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2020
url https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/1/2020GC008960.pdf
genre Geomagnetic Pole
genre_facet Geomagnetic Pole
op_relation https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/164243/1/2020GC008960.pdf
Bono, RK, Biggin, AJ, Holme, R et al. (3 more authors) (2020) Covariant Giant Gaussian Process Models With Improved Reproduction of Palaeosecular Variation. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (8). e2020GC008960. ISSN 1525-2027
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766006073455542272