The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica

Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nield, GA, Whitehouse, PL, Van der Wal, W, Blank, B, O'Donnell, JP, Stuart, GW
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/1/ggy158.pdf
id ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:138624
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:138624 2023-05-15T13:57:46+02:00 The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica Nield, GA Whitehouse, PL Van der Wal, W Blank, B O'Donnell, JP Stuart, GW 2018-08-01 text https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/ https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/1/ggy158.pdf en eng Oxford University Press https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/1/ggy158.pdf Nield, GA, Whitehouse, PL, Van der Wal, W et al. (3 more authors) (2018) The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica. Geophysical Journal International, 214 (2). pp. 811-824. ISSN 0956-540X cc_by_4 CC-BY Article NonPeerReviewed 2018 ftleedsuniv 2023-01-30T22:12:44Z Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth structure (referred to as 1-D Earth models). Oversimplifying the actual Earth structure leads to bias in model predictions in regions where Earth parameters differ significantly from the global average, such as West Antarctica. We investigate the impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in Antarctica by carrying out two experiments that use different rheological approaches to define 3-D Earth models that include spatial variations in lithospheric thickness. The first experiment defines an elastic lithosphere with spatial variations in thickness inferred from seismic studies. We compare the results from this 3-D model with results derived from a 1-D Earth model that has a uniform lithospheric thickness defined as the average of the 3-D lithospheric thickness. Irrespective of the deglacial history and sublithospheric mantle viscosity, we find higher gradients of present-day uplift rates (i.e. higher amplitude and shorter wavelength) in West Antarctica when using the 3-D models, due to the thinner-than-1-D-average lithosphere prevalent in this region. The second experiment uses seismically inferred temperature as an input to a power-law rheology, thereby allowing the lithosphere to have a viscosity structure. Modelling the lithosphere with a power-law rheology results in a behaviour that is equivalent to a thinner lithosphere model, and it leads to higher amplitude and shorter wavelength deformation compared with the first experiment. We conclude that neglecting spatial variations in lithospheric thickness in GIA models will result in predictions of peak uplift and subsidence that are biased low in West Antarctica. This has important implications for ice-sheet modelling studies as the steeper gradients ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Ice Sheet West Antarctica White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York) West Antarctica
institution Open Polar
collection White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
op_collection_id ftleedsuniv
language English
description Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth structure (referred to as 1-D Earth models). Oversimplifying the actual Earth structure leads to bias in model predictions in regions where Earth parameters differ significantly from the global average, such as West Antarctica. We investigate the impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in Antarctica by carrying out two experiments that use different rheological approaches to define 3-D Earth models that include spatial variations in lithospheric thickness. The first experiment defines an elastic lithosphere with spatial variations in thickness inferred from seismic studies. We compare the results from this 3-D model with results derived from a 1-D Earth model that has a uniform lithospheric thickness defined as the average of the 3-D lithospheric thickness. Irrespective of the deglacial history and sublithospheric mantle viscosity, we find higher gradients of present-day uplift rates (i.e. higher amplitude and shorter wavelength) in West Antarctica when using the 3-D models, due to the thinner-than-1-D-average lithosphere prevalent in this region. The second experiment uses seismically inferred temperature as an input to a power-law rheology, thereby allowing the lithosphere to have a viscosity structure. Modelling the lithosphere with a power-law rheology results in a behaviour that is equivalent to a thinner lithosphere model, and it leads to higher amplitude and shorter wavelength deformation compared with the first experiment. We conclude that neglecting spatial variations in lithospheric thickness in GIA models will result in predictions of peak uplift and subsidence that are biased low in West Antarctica. This has important implications for ice-sheet modelling studies as the steeper gradients ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nield, GA
Whitehouse, PL
Van der Wal, W
Blank, B
O'Donnell, JP
Stuart, GW
spellingShingle Nield, GA
Whitehouse, PL
Van der Wal, W
Blank, B
O'Donnell, JP
Stuart, GW
The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
author_facet Nield, GA
Whitehouse, PL
Van der Wal, W
Blank, B
O'Donnell, JP
Stuart, GW
author_sort Nield, GA
title The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
title_short The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
title_full The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
title_fullStr The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
title_full_unstemmed The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica
title_sort impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in west antarctica
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2018
url https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/1/ggy158.pdf
geographic West Antarctica
geographic_facet West Antarctica
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Sheet
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Sheet
West Antarctica
op_relation https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138624/1/ggy158.pdf
Nield, GA, Whitehouse, PL, Van der Wal, W et al. (3 more authors) (2018) The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica. Geophysical Journal International, 214 (2). pp. 811-824. ISSN 0956-540X
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
_version_ 1766265664572489728