Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models

We compare measurements of the turbulent and radiative surface energy fluxes from an automatic weather station (AWS) on Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica with corresponding fluxes from three high-resolution atmospheric models over a 1 month period during austral summer. All three models produce a reaso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: King, JC, Gadian, A, Kirchgaessner, A, Kuipers Munneke, P, Lachlan-Cope, TA, Orr, A, Reijmer, C, van den Broeke, MR, van Wessem, JM, Weeks, M
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/1/King_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf
id ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:123660
record_format openpolar
spelling ftleedsuniv:oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:123660 2023-05-15T13:38:35+02:00 Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models King, JC Gadian, A Kirchgaessner, A Kuipers Munneke, P Lachlan-Cope, TA Orr, A Reijmer, C van den Broeke, MR van Wessem, JM Weeks, M 2015-02-27 text https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/ https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/1/King_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf en eng American Geophysical Union https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/1/King_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf King, JC, Gadian, A orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-403X , Kirchgaessner, A et al. (7 more authors) (2015) Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120 (4). pp. 1335-1347. ISSN 2169-897X Article NonPeerReviewed 2015 ftleedsuniv 2023-01-30T22:00:44Z We compare measurements of the turbulent and radiative surface energy fluxes from an automatic weather station (AWS) on Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica with corresponding fluxes from three high-resolution atmospheric models over a 1 month period during austral summer. All three models produce a reasonable simulation of the (relatively small) turbulent energy fluxes at the AWS site. However, biases in the modeled radiative fluxes, which dominate the surface energy budget, are significant. There is a significant positive bias in net shortwave radiation in all three models, together with a corresponding negative bias in net longwave radiation. In two of the models, the longwave bias only partially offsets the positive shortwave bias, leading to an excessive amount of energy available for heating and melting the surface, while, in the third, the negative longwave bias exceeds the positive shortwave bias, leading to a deficiency in calculated surface melt. Biases in shortwave and longwave radiation are anticorrelated, suggesting that they both result from the models simulating too little cloud (or clouds that are too optically thin). We conclude that, while these models may be able to provide some useful information on surface energy fluxes, absolute values of modeled melt rate are significantly biased and should be used with caution. Efforts to improve model simulation of melt should initially focus on the radiative fluxes and, in particular, on the simulation of the clouds that control these fluxes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Ice Shelf White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York) Austral
institution Open Polar
collection White Rose Research Online (Universities of Leeds, Sheffield & York)
op_collection_id ftleedsuniv
language English
description We compare measurements of the turbulent and radiative surface energy fluxes from an automatic weather station (AWS) on Larsen C Ice Shelf, Antarctica with corresponding fluxes from three high-resolution atmospheric models over a 1 month period during austral summer. All three models produce a reasonable simulation of the (relatively small) turbulent energy fluxes at the AWS site. However, biases in the modeled radiative fluxes, which dominate the surface energy budget, are significant. There is a significant positive bias in net shortwave radiation in all three models, together with a corresponding negative bias in net longwave radiation. In two of the models, the longwave bias only partially offsets the positive shortwave bias, leading to an excessive amount of energy available for heating and melting the surface, while, in the third, the negative longwave bias exceeds the positive shortwave bias, leading to a deficiency in calculated surface melt. Biases in shortwave and longwave radiation are anticorrelated, suggesting that they both result from the models simulating too little cloud (or clouds that are too optically thin). We conclude that, while these models may be able to provide some useful information on surface energy fluxes, absolute values of modeled melt rate are significantly biased and should be used with caution. Efforts to improve model simulation of melt should initially focus on the radiative fluxes and, in particular, on the simulation of the clouds that control these fluxes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author King, JC
Gadian, A
Kirchgaessner, A
Kuipers Munneke, P
Lachlan-Cope, TA
Orr, A
Reijmer, C
van den Broeke, MR
van Wessem, JM
Weeks, M
spellingShingle King, JC
Gadian, A
Kirchgaessner, A
Kuipers Munneke, P
Lachlan-Cope, TA
Orr, A
Reijmer, C
van den Broeke, MR
van Wessem, JM
Weeks, M
Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
author_facet King, JC
Gadian, A
Kirchgaessner, A
Kuipers Munneke, P
Lachlan-Cope, TA
Orr, A
Reijmer, C
van den Broeke, MR
van Wessem, JM
Weeks, M
author_sort King, JC
title Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
title_short Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
title_full Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
title_fullStr Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
title_sort validation of the summertime surface energy budget of larsen c ice shelf (antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models
publisher American Geophysical Union
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/1/King_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf
geographic Austral
geographic_facet Austral
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
Ice Shelf
op_relation https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/123660/1/King_et_al-2015-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Atmospheres.pdf
King, JC, Gadian, A orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-403X , Kirchgaessner, A et al. (7 more authors) (2015) Validation of the summertime surface energy budget of Larsen C Ice Shelf (Antarctica) as represented in three high-resolution atmospheric models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120 (4). pp. 1335-1347. ISSN 2169-897X
_version_ 1766108598983720960