Dýra- og mannsbit
Neðst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn View/Open Information on incidence, epidemiology and complications of human and animal bites in Nordic countries is limited, but these injuries can carry serious infectious complications. We conducted a prospectiv...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Icelandic |
Published: |
Læknafélag Íslands, Læknafélag Reykjavíkur
2009
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2336/69073 |
id |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/69073 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/69073 2023-05-15T16:49:39+02:00 Dýra- og mannsbit Animal and human bites in Iceland Kristján Oddsson Guðrún Stefánsdóttir Brynjólfur Mogensen Sigurður Guðmundsson 2009-05-27 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/69073 is ice Læknafélag Íslands, Læknafélag Reykjavíkur http://www.laeknabladid.is Læknablaðið 1995, 81(2):126-32 0023-7213 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/69073 Læknablaðið Áverkar Gæludýr Animals Dogs Bites and Stings Iceland Bites Human Anti-Bacterial Agents Wound Infection etiology Article 2009 ftlandspitaliuni 2022-05-29T08:21:21Z Neðst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn View/Open Information on incidence, epidemiology and complications of human and animal bites in Nordic countries is limited, but these injuries can carry serious infectious complications. We conducted a prospective study at the Borgarspitalinn Emergency Department (ED) from August 1991 to July 1992. During this time 145 individuals entered the ED due to bites (accounting for ~0.4% of all admissions to the ED); 66 subjects (46%) had been bitten by dogs (41 provoked), 29 (20%) by cats, 34 (23%) by humans and 16 (11%) by other animals (horse, rabbit, hamster, rat, parrot, piranha fish, guinea pig, mink). The victims of dog and human bites were primarily men under 30 years of age, 73% and 79%, respectively. Dog and human bites were most common during the summer months and 41% of subjects bitten by humans were inebriated. Culture specimens were obtained on admission from 67 subjects, 31 from dog bites (58% positive), 10 from cat bites (80% positive), 19 from human bites (84% positive) and 7 from other bites (43% positive). The most common organisms isolated from dog bites were β-hemolytic streptococci, S. aureus and CDC M-5, from cat bites Pasturella multocida, Flavobacterium sp. and from human bites S. aureus and β-hemolytic streptococci. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed to 92 (63%) of the victims. Clinical infection was observed in 23 (16%) individuals. The infection rates after dog, cat and human bites were 8%, 28% and 29%, respectively. Three individuals bitten by humans had to be hospitalized due to osteomyelitis and/or severe cellulitis. The demography of bites in this study was similar to that reported elsewhere. Infection rates were comparatively low, possibly due to current habits of prophylactic antimicrobial use. Upplýsingar um faraldsfræði og afleiðingar bita dýra og manna eru af skornum skammti á Norðurlöndum. Gerð var framsýn athugun á öllum sem leituðu til slysadeildar Borgarspítalans vegna bitsára frá ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive Smella ENVELOPE(29.443,29.443,69.896,69.896) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive |
op_collection_id |
ftlandspitaliuni |
language |
Icelandic |
topic |
Áverkar Gæludýr Animals Dogs Bites and Stings Iceland Bites Human Anti-Bacterial Agents Wound Infection etiology |
spellingShingle |
Áverkar Gæludýr Animals Dogs Bites and Stings Iceland Bites Human Anti-Bacterial Agents Wound Infection etiology Kristján Oddsson Guðrún Stefánsdóttir Brynjólfur Mogensen Sigurður Guðmundsson Dýra- og mannsbit |
topic_facet |
Áverkar Gæludýr Animals Dogs Bites and Stings Iceland Bites Human Anti-Bacterial Agents Wound Infection etiology |
description |
Neðst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn View/Open Information on incidence, epidemiology and complications of human and animal bites in Nordic countries is limited, but these injuries can carry serious infectious complications. We conducted a prospective study at the Borgarspitalinn Emergency Department (ED) from August 1991 to July 1992. During this time 145 individuals entered the ED due to bites (accounting for ~0.4% of all admissions to the ED); 66 subjects (46%) had been bitten by dogs (41 provoked), 29 (20%) by cats, 34 (23%) by humans and 16 (11%) by other animals (horse, rabbit, hamster, rat, parrot, piranha fish, guinea pig, mink). The victims of dog and human bites were primarily men under 30 years of age, 73% and 79%, respectively. Dog and human bites were most common during the summer months and 41% of subjects bitten by humans were inebriated. Culture specimens were obtained on admission from 67 subjects, 31 from dog bites (58% positive), 10 from cat bites (80% positive), 19 from human bites (84% positive) and 7 from other bites (43% positive). The most common organisms isolated from dog bites were β-hemolytic streptococci, S. aureus and CDC M-5, from cat bites Pasturella multocida, Flavobacterium sp. and from human bites S. aureus and β-hemolytic streptococci. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed to 92 (63%) of the victims. Clinical infection was observed in 23 (16%) individuals. The infection rates after dog, cat and human bites were 8%, 28% and 29%, respectively. Three individuals bitten by humans had to be hospitalized due to osteomyelitis and/or severe cellulitis. The demography of bites in this study was similar to that reported elsewhere. Infection rates were comparatively low, possibly due to current habits of prophylactic antimicrobial use. Upplýsingar um faraldsfræði og afleiðingar bita dýra og manna eru af skornum skammti á Norðurlöndum. Gerð var framsýn athugun á öllum sem leituðu til slysadeildar Borgarspítalans vegna bitsára frá ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kristján Oddsson Guðrún Stefánsdóttir Brynjólfur Mogensen Sigurður Guðmundsson |
author_facet |
Kristján Oddsson Guðrún Stefánsdóttir Brynjólfur Mogensen Sigurður Guðmundsson |
author_sort |
Kristján Oddsson |
title |
Dýra- og mannsbit |
title_short |
Dýra- og mannsbit |
title_full |
Dýra- og mannsbit |
title_fullStr |
Dýra- og mannsbit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dýra- og mannsbit |
title_sort |
dýra- og mannsbit |
publisher |
Læknafélag Íslands, Læknafélag Reykjavíkur |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2336/69073 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(29.443,29.443,69.896,69.896) |
geographic |
Smella |
geographic_facet |
Smella |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
http://www.laeknabladid.is Læknablaðið 1995, 81(2):126-32 0023-7213 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/69073 Læknablaðið |
_version_ |
1766039801501319168 |