Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals.
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page Non-invasive prenatal testing is increasingly available worldwide and stakeholder viewpoints are essential to guide implementation. Here we compare the preferences of women and health profes...
Published in: | European Journal of Human Genetics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2336/617892 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 |
id |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/617892 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive |
op_collection_id |
ftlandspitaliuni |
language |
English |
topic |
Downs heilkenni Foreldrar Meðganga Fóstureyðingar NAF12 MIW12 Down Syndrome/diagnosis* Health Personnel/psychology* Patient Preference* Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires |
spellingShingle |
Downs heilkenni Foreldrar Meðganga Fóstureyðingar NAF12 MIW12 Down Syndrome/diagnosis* Health Personnel/psychology* Patient Preference* Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Hill, Melissa Johnson, Jo-Ann Langlois, Sylvie Lee, Hyun Winsor, Stephanie Dineley, Brigid Horniachek, Marisa Lalatta, Faustina Ronzoni, Luisa Barrett, Angela N Advani, Henna V Choolani, Mahesh Rabinowitz, Ron Pajkrt, Eva van Schendel, Rachèl V Henneman, Lidewij Rommers, Wieke Bilardo, Caterina M Rendeiro, Paula Ribeiro, Maria João Rocha, José Bay Lund, Ida Charlotte Petersen, Olav B Becher, Naja Vogel, Ida Stefánsdottir, Vigdis Ingvarsdottir, Sigrun Gottfredsdottir, Helga Morris, Stephen Chitty, Lyn S Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
topic_facet |
Downs heilkenni Foreldrar Meðganga Fóstureyðingar NAF12 MIW12 Down Syndrome/diagnosis* Health Personnel/psychology* Patient Preference* Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires |
description |
To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page Non-invasive prenatal testing is increasingly available worldwide and stakeholder viewpoints are essential to guide implementation. Here we compare the preferences of women and health professionals from nine different countries towards attributes of non-invasive and invasive prenatal tests for Down syndrome. A discrete choice experiment was used to obtain participants' stated preference for prenatal tests that varied according to four attributes: accuracy, time of test, risk of miscarriage, and type of information. Pregnant women and health professionals were recruited from Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. A total of 2666 women's and 1245 health professionals' questionnaires were included in the analysis. Differences in preferences were seen between women and health professionals within and between countries. Overall, women placed greater emphasis on test safety and comprehensive information than health professionals, who emphasised accuracy and early testing. Differences between women's and health professionals' preferences are marked between countries. Varied approaches to implementation and service delivery are therefore needed and individual countries should develop guidelines appropriate for their own social and screening contexts. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Programme Grants for Applied Research programme RP-PG-0707-10107 NIHR Comprehensive Research Network NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children |
author2 |
1 UCL Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, Level 5,Barclay House,37,Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BH, England 2 Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Level 5,Barclay House,37,Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BH, England 3 Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada 4 Univ British Columbia, Dept Med Genet, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5 McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada 6 Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Clin Genet Unit, Milan, Italy 7 Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Singapore 117595, Singapore 8 Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel 9 Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fetal Med Unit, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands 10 Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Sect Community Genet, Dept Clin Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands 11 Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Fetal Med Unit, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Groningen, Netherlands 12 CGC Genet, Oporto, Portugal 13 CESPU, IINFACTS, Oporto, Portugal 14 Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark 15 Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark 16 Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Genet & Mol Med, Reykjavik, Iceland Organization-Enhanced Name(s) Landspitali National University Hospital 17 Natl Univ Hosp Reykjavik, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland 18 Univ Iceland, Fac Nursing, Dept Midwifery, Reykjavik, Iceland 19 UCL, Res Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hill, Melissa Johnson, Jo-Ann Langlois, Sylvie Lee, Hyun Winsor, Stephanie Dineley, Brigid Horniachek, Marisa Lalatta, Faustina Ronzoni, Luisa Barrett, Angela N Advani, Henna V Choolani, Mahesh Rabinowitz, Ron Pajkrt, Eva van Schendel, Rachèl V Henneman, Lidewij Rommers, Wieke Bilardo, Caterina M Rendeiro, Paula Ribeiro, Maria João Rocha, José Bay Lund, Ida Charlotte Petersen, Olav B Becher, Naja Vogel, Ida Stefánsdottir, Vigdis Ingvarsdottir, Sigrun Gottfredsdottir, Helga Morris, Stephen Chitty, Lyn S |
author_facet |
Hill, Melissa Johnson, Jo-Ann Langlois, Sylvie Lee, Hyun Winsor, Stephanie Dineley, Brigid Horniachek, Marisa Lalatta, Faustina Ronzoni, Luisa Barrett, Angela N Advani, Henna V Choolani, Mahesh Rabinowitz, Ron Pajkrt, Eva van Schendel, Rachèl V Henneman, Lidewij Rommers, Wieke Bilardo, Caterina M Rendeiro, Paula Ribeiro, Maria João Rocha, José Bay Lund, Ida Charlotte Petersen, Olav B Becher, Naja Vogel, Ida Stefánsdottir, Vigdis Ingvarsdottir, Sigrun Gottfredsdottir, Helga Morris, Stephen Chitty, Lyn S |
author_sort |
Hill, Melissa |
title |
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
title_short |
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
title_full |
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
title_fullStr |
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
title_sort |
preferences for prenatal tests for down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2336/617892 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v24/n7/pdf/ejhg2015249a.pdf Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. 2016, 24 (7):968-75 Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1476-5438 26577044 doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/617892 European journal of human genetics : EJHG |
op_rights |
Archived with thanks to European journal of human genetics : EJHG Landspitali Access - LSH-aðgangur |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 |
container_title |
European Journal of Human Genetics |
container_volume |
24 |
container_issue |
7 |
container_start_page |
968 |
op_container_end_page |
975 |
_version_ |
1766041584027041792 |
spelling |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/617892 2023-05-15T16:51:28+02:00 Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. Hill, Melissa Johnson, Jo-Ann Langlois, Sylvie Lee, Hyun Winsor, Stephanie Dineley, Brigid Horniachek, Marisa Lalatta, Faustina Ronzoni, Luisa Barrett, Angela N Advani, Henna V Choolani, Mahesh Rabinowitz, Ron Pajkrt, Eva van Schendel, Rachèl V Henneman, Lidewij Rommers, Wieke Bilardo, Caterina M Rendeiro, Paula Ribeiro, Maria João Rocha, José Bay Lund, Ida Charlotte Petersen, Olav B Becher, Naja Vogel, Ida Stefánsdottir, Vigdis Ingvarsdottir, Sigrun Gottfredsdottir, Helga Morris, Stephen Chitty, Lyn S 1 UCL Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, Level 5,Barclay House,37,Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BH, England 2 Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Level 5,Barclay House,37,Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BH, England 3 Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada 4 Univ British Columbia, Dept Med Genet, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5 McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada 6 Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Clin Genet Unit, Milan, Italy 7 Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Singapore 117595, Singapore 8 Shaare Zedek Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jerusalem, Israel 9 Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fetal Med Unit, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands 10 Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Sect Community Genet, Dept Clin Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands 11 Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Fetal Med Unit, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Groningen, Netherlands 12 CGC Genet, Oporto, Portugal 13 CESPU, IINFACTS, Oporto, Portugal 14 Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Genet, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark 15 Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark 16 Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Genet & Mol Med, Reykjavik, Iceland Organization-Enhanced Name(s) Landspitali National University Hospital 17 Natl Univ Hosp Reykjavik, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland 18 Univ Iceland, Fac Nursing, Dept Midwifery, Reykjavik, Iceland 19 UCL, Res Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England 2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/617892 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 en eng Nature Publishing Group http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v24/n7/pdf/ejhg2015249a.pdf Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. 2016, 24 (7):968-75 Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1476-5438 26577044 doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/617892 European journal of human genetics : EJHG Archived with thanks to European journal of human genetics : EJHG Landspitali Access - LSH-aðgangur Downs heilkenni Foreldrar Meðganga Fóstureyðingar NAF12 MIW12 Down Syndrome/diagnosis* Health Personnel/psychology* Patient Preference* Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Article 2016 ftlandspitaliuni https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.249 2022-05-29T08:22:10Z To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink at the bottom of the page Non-invasive prenatal testing is increasingly available worldwide and stakeholder viewpoints are essential to guide implementation. Here we compare the preferences of women and health professionals from nine different countries towards attributes of non-invasive and invasive prenatal tests for Down syndrome. A discrete choice experiment was used to obtain participants' stated preference for prenatal tests that varied according to four attributes: accuracy, time of test, risk of miscarriage, and type of information. Pregnant women and health professionals were recruited from Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. A total of 2666 women's and 1245 health professionals' questionnaires were included in the analysis. Differences in preferences were seen between women and health professionals within and between countries. Overall, women placed greater emphasis on test safety and comprehensive information than health professionals, who emphasised accuracy and early testing. Differences between women's and health professionals' preferences are marked between countries. Varied approaches to implementation and service delivery are therefore needed and individual countries should develop guidelines appropriate for their own social and screening contexts. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Programme Grants for Applied Research programme RP-PG-0707-10107 NIHR Comprehensive Research Network NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive Canada European Journal of Human Genetics 24 7 968 975 |