Eftirlit og meðferð kransæðasjúklinga á heilsugæslustöð

Neðst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn View/Open Objective: Prevention, both primary and secondary, is an important part in the daily work of most doc-tors. Family physicians (FP) carry the responsibility of implementing both stages of prevention. Coro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emil L. Sigurðsson, Jón Steinar Jónsson, Guðmundur Þorgeirsson
Other Authors: Medical surveilance and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in general practice
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Icelandic
Published: Læknafélag Íslands, Læknafélag Reykjavíkur 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2336/47220
Description
Summary:Neðst á síðunni er hægt að nálgast greinina í heild sinni með því að smella á hlekkinn View/Open Objective: Prevention, both primary and secondary, is an important part in the daily work of most doc-tors. Family physicians (FP) carry the responsibility of implementing both stages of prevention. Coronary heart disease (CHD) is an example of chronic disease where FP have a responsibility both in treatment and prevention. Recent large double blind clinical trials have confirmed the efficacy of various methods of secondary prevention. However, it seems that these tools are used insufficiently, and there may be opportunities for improvement. The aim of this study, which is a part of a larger inquiry about CHD patients, was to evaluate what kind of surveillance these patients receive by their FP and how secondary prevention is organized and implemented in general. Material and methods: All CHD patients with residence in Hafnarfjörður, Garðabær and Bessastaðahreppur (urban communities with 25,000 inhabitants), were invitated to participate in the study. They received an invitation letter and a request for an informed consent. If they chose to participate they answered a questionnaire about CHD risk factors and their medical treatment. Information about their CHD status was gathered by a review of their records at the respective health center. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of their history: I. Myocardial infarction (MI), II. coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), III. percutaneous transiluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), IV. angina pectoris (AP). If a patient fulfilled the critera for more than one diagnostic group the CABG group had the highest priority followed by PTCA, MI and finally AP. Results: Of 533 patients with CHD 402 (75%) participated in the study. Electrocardiogram had been recorded for 225 (56%) of these patients. Information about blood pressure was found for 369 (92%) and the mean systolic blood pressure was 143 mraHg (SD 19.8) and diastolic 82 mmHg (SD 9.5). Of CHD patients ...