Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly.
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field. BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aims were (1) to compare fat free mass (FFM) estimates from regional hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis (HHBIA) with conventional BIA (CBIA) and dual ene...
Published in: | European Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2336/227851 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 |
id |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/227851 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftlandspitaliuni:oai:www.hirsla.lsh.is:2336/227851 2023-05-15T16:49:08+02:00 Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. Ramel, A Geirsdottir, O G Arnarson, A Thorsdottir, I Unit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali-University Hospital & Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. alfons@landspitali.is 2012-06-07 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/227851 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 en eng Nature Publishing Group http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65(8):978-83 1476-5640 21559037 doi:10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/227851 European journal of clinical nutrition Archived with thanks to European journal of clinical nutrition Absorptiometry Photon Adipose Tissue Aged Body Composition Body Mass Index Electric Impedance Female Humans Iceland Male Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results Article 2012 ftlandspitaliuni https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 2022-05-29T08:21:48Z To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field. BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aims were (1) to compare fat free mass (FFM) estimates from regional hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis (HHBIA) with conventional BIA (CBIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and (2) to develop a population specific equation for FFM prediction in Icelandic elderly. SUBJECTS/METHODS: DXA, CBIA and HHBIA data were available for 98 free-living Icelandic elderly (age=73.0 ± 5.6 years, body mass index=28.8 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)). Participants were randomized into a development block (n=50) and validation block (n=48). A population specific equation for FFM prediction was calculated using CBIA-derived resistance and anthropometric data from the development block and then compared with other BIA equations (Deurenberg, Segal, company-specific equations) and DXA estimates using the validation block. RESULTS: The correlations between BIA methods and DXA were very high, that is, >0.9; however, mean differences compared with DXA were quite variable, ranging from -5.0 (Deurenberg) to +2.5 (Segal, HHBIA) and +3.3 kg (CBIA). Mean difference of the population-specific equation was below 0.1 kg. The standard deviations of the differences ranged from 2.6 to 3.3 kg. The limits of agreement of the BIA methods were similar and between 9.9 and 12.9 kg. CONCLUSIONS: In Icelandic elderly, HHBIA and CBIA produce similar FFM estimates when using company-specific prediction equations. CBIA provides the additional possibility to use a population-specific prediction equation, which yields best results. However, limits of agreement were wide and similar of all employed BIA methods, which indicates principal limitations of BIA analysis in the determination of FFM. Icelandic Technology Development Fund 071323008 The University of Iceland Helga Jonsdottir and Sigurlidi Kristjansson Geriatric Research Fund Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive Bia ENVELOPE(22.891,22.891,70.317,70.317) European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65 8 978 983 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Hirsla - Landspítali University Hospital research archive |
op_collection_id |
ftlandspitaliuni |
language |
English |
topic |
Absorptiometry Photon Adipose Tissue Aged Body Composition Body Mass Index Electric Impedance Female Humans Iceland Male Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results |
spellingShingle |
Absorptiometry Photon Adipose Tissue Aged Body Composition Body Mass Index Electric Impedance Female Humans Iceland Male Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results Ramel, A Geirsdottir, O G Arnarson, A Thorsdottir, I Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
topic_facet |
Absorptiometry Photon Adipose Tissue Aged Body Composition Body Mass Index Electric Impedance Female Humans Iceland Male Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results |
description |
To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field. BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aims were (1) to compare fat free mass (FFM) estimates from regional hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis (HHBIA) with conventional BIA (CBIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and (2) to develop a population specific equation for FFM prediction in Icelandic elderly. SUBJECTS/METHODS: DXA, CBIA and HHBIA data were available for 98 free-living Icelandic elderly (age=73.0 ± 5.6 years, body mass index=28.8 ± 5.2 kg/m(2)). Participants were randomized into a development block (n=50) and validation block (n=48). A population specific equation for FFM prediction was calculated using CBIA-derived resistance and anthropometric data from the development block and then compared with other BIA equations (Deurenberg, Segal, company-specific equations) and DXA estimates using the validation block. RESULTS: The correlations between BIA methods and DXA were very high, that is, >0.9; however, mean differences compared with DXA were quite variable, ranging from -5.0 (Deurenberg) to +2.5 (Segal, HHBIA) and +3.3 kg (CBIA). Mean difference of the population-specific equation was below 0.1 kg. The standard deviations of the differences ranged from 2.6 to 3.3 kg. The limits of agreement of the BIA methods were similar and between 9.9 and 12.9 kg. CONCLUSIONS: In Icelandic elderly, HHBIA and CBIA produce similar FFM estimates when using company-specific prediction equations. CBIA provides the additional possibility to use a population-specific prediction equation, which yields best results. However, limits of agreement were wide and similar of all employed BIA methods, which indicates principal limitations of BIA analysis in the determination of FFM. Icelandic Technology Development Fund 071323008 The University of Iceland Helga Jonsdottir and Sigurlidi Kristjansson Geriatric Research Fund |
author2 |
Unit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali-University Hospital & Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. alfons@landspitali.is |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Ramel, A Geirsdottir, O G Arnarson, A Thorsdottir, I |
author_facet |
Ramel, A Geirsdottir, O G Arnarson, A Thorsdottir, I |
author_sort |
Ramel, A |
title |
Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
title_short |
Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
title_full |
Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
title_fullStr |
Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with DXA in Icelandic elderly. |
title_sort |
regional and total body bioelectrical impedance analysis compared with dxa in icelandic elderly. |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2336/227851 https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(22.891,22.891,70.317,70.317) |
geographic |
Bia |
geographic_facet |
Bia |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65(8):978-83 1476-5640 21559037 doi:10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 http://hdl.handle.net/2336/227851 European journal of clinical nutrition |
op_rights |
Archived with thanks to European journal of clinical nutrition |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.65 |
container_title |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
container_volume |
65 |
container_issue |
8 |
container_start_page |
978 |
op_container_end_page |
983 |
_version_ |
1766039210596237312 |