Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and P...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Published: |
京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 |
id |
ftkyotouniv:oai:repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp:2433/250189 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftkyotouniv:oai:repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp:2433/250189 2023-05-15T18:13:21+02:00 Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction <研究論文>セデック語の伴連れ代名詞構文 OCHIAI, Izumi 落合, いずみ オチアイ, イズミ 2019-12-31 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 eng eng 京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室 Departmental of Linguistics, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University 1349-7804 http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 AA11576115 京都大学言語学研究 38 1 28 doi:10.14989/250189 Kyoto University Linguistic Research © 京都大学言語学研究室 Atayalic languages Formosan languages inclusory construction descriptive linguistics historical linguistics アタヤル語群 台湾オーストロネシア諸語 伴連れ代名詞構文 記述言語学 歴史言語学 801 departmental bulletin paper 2019 ftkyotouniv https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 2022-03-31T23:17:54Z This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and Proto-Atayal are re- constructed as including pronouns (*yami/*yamu in Proto-Seediq and *sami/*simu in Proto-Atayal) followed by a connector (*ka in Proto-Seediq and *ki in Proto- Atayal) followed by an included noun phrase. Further, the description of inclusory constructions in other Formosan languages such as Paiwan, Puyuma, Bunun, and Saisiyat are considered for reconstructing Proto-Atayalic inclusory constructions. As a result, the Proto-Atayalic inclusory construction is reconstructed as an includ- ing pronoun (*yami/*yamu) followed by a connector (*ka) followed by a personal marker (*i) followed by an included noun phrase. 本稿の主眼はセデック語パラン方言(オーストロネシア語族アタヤル語群)の連れ込み代名詞構文を共時的に記述し、かつ通時的に分析を加えることにある。さらにセデック語パラン方言のデータをほかのアタヤル語群の諸方言(セデック語トゥルク方言、アタヤル語スコレック方言、アタヤル語マリナハ方言、アタヤル語プルガワン方言)と比較し、各言語での祖形再建、さらにアタヤル語群での祖形再建を試みる。 Report sami Kyoto University Research Information Repository (KURENAI) Simu ENVELOPE(23.767,23.767,67.383,67.383) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Kyoto University Research Information Repository (KURENAI) |
op_collection_id |
ftkyotouniv |
language |
English |
topic |
Atayalic languages Formosan languages inclusory construction descriptive linguistics historical linguistics アタヤル語群 台湾オーストロネシア諸語 伴連れ代名詞構文 記述言語学 歴史言語学 801 |
spellingShingle |
Atayalic languages Formosan languages inclusory construction descriptive linguistics historical linguistics アタヤル語群 台湾オーストロネシア諸語 伴連れ代名詞構文 記述言語学 歴史言語学 801 OCHIAI, Izumi Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
topic_facet |
Atayalic languages Formosan languages inclusory construction descriptive linguistics historical linguistics アタヤル語群 台湾オーストロネシア諸語 伴連れ代名詞構文 記述言語学 歴史言語学 801 |
description |
This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and Proto-Atayal are re- constructed as including pronouns (*yami/*yamu in Proto-Seediq and *sami/*simu in Proto-Atayal) followed by a connector (*ka in Proto-Seediq and *ki in Proto- Atayal) followed by an included noun phrase. Further, the description of inclusory constructions in other Formosan languages such as Paiwan, Puyuma, Bunun, and Saisiyat are considered for reconstructing Proto-Atayalic inclusory constructions. As a result, the Proto-Atayalic inclusory construction is reconstructed as an includ- ing pronoun (*yami/*yamu) followed by a connector (*ka) followed by a personal marker (*i) followed by an included noun phrase. 本稿の主眼はセデック語パラン方言(オーストロネシア語族アタヤル語群)の連れ込み代名詞構文を共時的に記述し、かつ通時的に分析を加えることにある。さらにセデック語パラン方言のデータをほかのアタヤル語群の諸方言(セデック語トゥルク方言、アタヤル語スコレック方言、アタヤル語マリナハ方言、アタヤル語プルガワン方言)と比較し、各言語での祖形再建、さらにアタヤル語群での祖形再建を試みる。 |
author2 |
落合, いずみ オチアイ, イズミ |
format |
Report |
author |
OCHIAI, Izumi |
author_facet |
OCHIAI, Izumi |
author_sort |
OCHIAI, Izumi |
title |
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
title_short |
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
title_full |
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
title_fullStr |
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction |
title_sort |
inclusory constructions in seediq: reconstruction |
publisher |
京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室 |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(23.767,23.767,67.383,67.383) |
geographic |
Simu |
geographic_facet |
Simu |
genre |
sami |
genre_facet |
sami |
op_relation |
1349-7804 http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 AA11576115 京都大学言語学研究 38 1 28 doi:10.14989/250189 Kyoto University Linguistic Research |
op_rights |
© 京都大学言語学研究室 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 |
_version_ |
1766185866884022272 |