Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction

This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: OCHIAI, Izumi
Other Authors: 落合, いずみ, オチアイ, イズミ
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: 京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室 2019
Subjects:
801
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189
https://doi.org/10.14989/250189
id ftkyotouniv:oai:repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp:2433/250189
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkyotouniv:oai:repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp:2433/250189 2023-05-15T18:13:21+02:00 Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction <研究論文>セデック語の伴連れ代名詞構文 OCHIAI, Izumi 落合, いずみ オチアイ, イズミ 2019-12-31 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 eng eng 京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室 Departmental of Linguistics, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University 1349-7804 http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189 AA11576115 京都大学言語学研究 38 1 28 doi:10.14989/250189 Kyoto University Linguistic Research © 京都大学言語学研究室 Atayalic languages Formosan languages inclusory construction descriptive linguistics historical linguistics アタヤル語群 台湾オーストロネシア諸語 伴連れ代名詞構文 記述言語学 歴史言語学 801 departmental bulletin paper 2019 ftkyotouniv https://doi.org/10.14989/250189 2022-03-31T23:17:54Z This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and Proto-Atayal are re- constructed as including pronouns (*yami/*yamu in Proto-Seediq and *sami/*simu in Proto-Atayal) followed by a connector (*ka in Proto-Seediq and *ki in Proto- Atayal) followed by an included noun phrase. Further, the description of inclusory constructions in other Formosan languages such as Paiwan, Puyuma, Bunun, and Saisiyat are considered for reconstructing Proto-Atayalic inclusory constructions. As a result, the Proto-Atayalic inclusory construction is reconstructed as an includ- ing pronoun (*yami/*yamu) followed by a connector (*ka) followed by a personal marker (*i) followed by an included noun phrase. 本稿の主眼はセデック語パラン方言(オーストロネシア語族アタヤル語群)の連れ込み代名詞構文を共時的に記述し、かつ通時的に分析を加えることにある。さらにセデック語パラン方言のデータをほかのアタヤル語群の諸方言(セデック語トゥルク方言、アタヤル語スコレック方言、アタヤル語マリナハ方言、アタヤル語プルガワン方言)と比較し、各言語での祖形再建、さらにアタヤル語群での祖形再建を試みる。 Report sami Kyoto University Research Information Repository (KURENAI) Simu ENVELOPE(23.767,23.767,67.383,67.383)
institution Open Polar
collection Kyoto University Research Information Repository (KURENAI)
op_collection_id ftkyotouniv
language English
topic Atayalic languages
Formosan languages
inclusory construction
descriptive linguistics
historical linguistics
アタヤル語群
台湾オーストロネシア諸語
伴連れ代名詞構文
記述言語学
歴史言語学
801
spellingShingle Atayalic languages
Formosan languages
inclusory construction
descriptive linguistics
historical linguistics
アタヤル語群
台湾オーストロネシア諸語
伴連れ代名詞構文
記述言語学
歴史言語学
801
OCHIAI, Izumi
Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
topic_facet Atayalic languages
Formosan languages
inclusory construction
descriptive linguistics
historical linguistics
アタヤル語群
台湾オーストロネシア諸語
伴連れ代名詞構文
記述言語学
歴史言語学
801
description This paper first examines inclusory constructions in Paran Seediq (Atay-alic, Austronesian) from a synchronic perspective and then compares them to those inclusory constructions in the Truku Seediq and Atayal dialects. On the basis of this comparison, the inclusory constructions in Proto-Seediq and Proto-Atayal are re- constructed as including pronouns (*yami/*yamu in Proto-Seediq and *sami/*simu in Proto-Atayal) followed by a connector (*ka in Proto-Seediq and *ki in Proto- Atayal) followed by an included noun phrase. Further, the description of inclusory constructions in other Formosan languages such as Paiwan, Puyuma, Bunun, and Saisiyat are considered for reconstructing Proto-Atayalic inclusory constructions. As a result, the Proto-Atayalic inclusory construction is reconstructed as an includ- ing pronoun (*yami/*yamu) followed by a connector (*ka) followed by a personal marker (*i) followed by an included noun phrase. 本稿の主眼はセデック語パラン方言(オーストロネシア語族アタヤル語群)の連れ込み代名詞構文を共時的に記述し、かつ通時的に分析を加えることにある。さらにセデック語パラン方言のデータをほかのアタヤル語群の諸方言(セデック語トゥルク方言、アタヤル語スコレック方言、アタヤル語マリナハ方言、アタヤル語プルガワン方言)と比較し、各言語での祖形再建、さらにアタヤル語群での祖形再建を試みる。
author2 落合, いずみ
オチアイ, イズミ
format Report
author OCHIAI, Izumi
author_facet OCHIAI, Izumi
author_sort OCHIAI, Izumi
title Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
title_short Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
title_full Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
title_fullStr Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Inclusory constructions in Seediq: Reconstruction
title_sort inclusory constructions in seediq: reconstruction
publisher 京都大学大学院文学研究科言語学研究室
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189
https://doi.org/10.14989/250189
long_lat ENVELOPE(23.767,23.767,67.383,67.383)
geographic Simu
geographic_facet Simu
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_relation 1349-7804
http://hdl.handle.net/2433/250189
AA11576115
京都大学言語学研究
38
1
28
doi:10.14989/250189
Kyoto University Linguistic Research
op_rights © 京都大学言語学研究室
op_doi https://doi.org/10.14989/250189
_version_ 1766185866884022272