How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?

Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta) and shoveler (A. clypeata), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archiv für Hydrobiologie
Main Authors: Charalambidou, I., Santamaría, L., Figuerola, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11755/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
id ftknawnlpublic:oai:pure.knaw.nl:publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
record_format openpolar
spelling ftknawnlpublic:oai:pure.knaw.nl:publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa 2024-09-15T17:39:18+00:00 How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts? Charalambidou, I. Santamaría, L. Figuerola, J. 2003 https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11755/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa eng eng https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Charalambidou , I , Santamaría , L & Figuerola , J 2003 , ' How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts? ' , Archiv für Hydrobiologie , vol. 157 , no. 4 , pp. 547-554 . https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547 article 2003 ftknawnlpublic https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-054720.500.11755/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa 2024-07-22T23:43:53Z Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta) and shoveler (A. clypeata), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact statoblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their retention times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29% for pintail and 13 ± 21% for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79-96% for pintail and 51-96% for shoveler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours for pintail and 32 hours for shoveler. A few statoblasts retrieved two hours following gut passage germinated, but none in the control group did. We provide evidence that the potential for waterfowl dispersal of C. mucedo statoblasts is higher for short distances up to 300 kilometres, but still possible over longer distances Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta) and shoveler (A. clypeata), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact statoblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their retention times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29% for pintail and 13 ± 21% for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79-96% for pintail and 51-96% for shoveler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Anas acuta Shoveler Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Research Portal (KNAW) Archiv für Hydrobiologie 157 4 547 554
institution Open Polar
collection Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Research Portal (KNAW)
op_collection_id ftknawnlpublic
language English
description Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta) and shoveler (A. clypeata), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact statoblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their retention times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29% for pintail and 13 ± 21% for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79-96% for pintail and 51-96% for shoveler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours for pintail and 32 hours for shoveler. A few statoblasts retrieved two hours following gut passage germinated, but none in the control group did. We provide evidence that the potential for waterfowl dispersal of C. mucedo statoblasts is higher for short distances up to 300 kilometres, but still possible over longer distances Statoblasts of Cristatella mucedo were fed to two duck species, pintail (Anas acuta) and shoveler (A. clypeata), to assess whether endozoochorous dispersal is responsible for the metapopulation structure of this bryozoan. Eight individuals (four per duck species) were force-fed 500 statoblasts each. The number of intact statoblasts retrieved from the ducks faeces up to 48 hours after ingestion and their retention times, i.e. the time spent in the gut from ingestion to defecation, were recorded. Retrieval of intact statoblasts did not differ significantly between duck species (37 ± 29% for pintail and 13 ± 21% for shoveler, average ± SE) and the pattern of retrieval over time was identical. Most statoblasts (79-96% for pintail and 51-96% for shoveler) were recovered during the first four hours after ingestion. Maximum retention times were 44 hours ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Charalambidou, I.
Santamaría, L.
Figuerola, J.
spellingShingle Charalambidou, I.
Santamaría, L.
Figuerola, J.
How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
author_facet Charalambidou, I.
Santamaría, L.
Figuerola, J.
author_sort Charalambidou, I.
title How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_short How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_full How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_fullStr How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_full_unstemmed How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
title_sort how far can the freshwater bryozoan cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts?
publishDate 2003
url https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11755/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
genre Anas acuta
Shoveler
genre_facet Anas acuta
Shoveler
op_source Charalambidou , I , Santamaría , L & Figuerola , J 2003 , ' How far can the freshwater bryozoan Cristatella mucedo disperse in duck guts? ' , Archiv für Hydrobiologie , vol. 157 , no. 4 , pp. 547-554 . https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-0547
op_relation https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-9136/2003/0157-054720.500.11755/fc9392dc-b331-47e9-b9e8-7495c51e87fa
container_title Archiv für Hydrobiologie
container_volume 157
container_issue 4
container_start_page 547
op_container_end_page 554
_version_ 1810479030014574592