How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement
Objectives: To provide consensus recommendations on how to intervene in the caries process in adults, specifically proximal and secondary carious lesions. Methods: Based on two systematic reviews, a consensus conference and followed by an e-Delphi consensus process were held with EFCD/ORCA/DGZ deleg...
Published in: | Clinical Oral Investigations |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-to-intervene-in-the-caries-process-in-adults(bb87aa98-8a39-4ce5-a598-85ddbc0534b0).html https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087672837&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
id |
ftkingscollondon:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/bb87aa98-8a39-4ce5-a598-85ddbc0534b0 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftkingscollondon:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/bb87aa98-8a39-4ce5-a598-85ddbc0534b0 2023-05-15T17:53:39+02:00 How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement Schwendicke, Falk Splieth, Christian H. Bottenberg, Peter Breschi, Lorenzo Campus, Guglielmo Doméjean, Sophie Ekstrand, Kim Giacaman, Rodrigo A. Haak, Rainer Hannig, Matthias Hickel, Reinhard Juric, Hrvoje Lussi, Adrian Machiulskiene, Vita Manton, David Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita Opdam, Niek Paris, Sebastian Santamaria, Ruth Tassery, Hervé Zandona, Andrea Zero, Domenick Zimmer, Stefan Banerjee, Avijit 2020-09-01 https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-to-intervene-in-the-caries-process-in-adults(bb87aa98-8a39-4ce5-a598-85ddbc0534b0).html https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087672837&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Schwendicke , F , Splieth , C H , Bottenberg , P , Breschi , L , Campus , G , Doméjean , S , Ekstrand , K , Giacaman , R A , Haak , R , Hannig , M , Hickel , R , Juric , H , Lussi , A , Machiulskiene , V , Manton , D , Jablonski-Momeni , A , Opdam , N , Paris , S , Santamaria , R , Tassery , H , Zandona , A , Zero , D , Zimmer , S & Banerjee , A 2020 , ' How to intervene in the caries process in adults : proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement ' , CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS , vol. 24 , no. 9 , pp. 3315-3321 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 Caries Consensus Decision-making Fluoride Infiltration Recommendations Restorations Sealing article 2020 ftkingscollondon https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 2022-10-14T10:48:21Z Objectives: To provide consensus recommendations on how to intervene in the caries process in adults, specifically proximal and secondary carious lesions. Methods: Based on two systematic reviews, a consensus conference and followed by an e-Delphi consensus process were held with EFCD/ORCA/DGZ delegates. Results: Managing an individual’s caries risk using non-invasive means (oral hygiene measures including flossing/interdental brushes, fluoride application) is recommended, as both proximal and secondary carious lesions may be prevented or their activity reduced. For proximal lesions, only cavitated lesions (confirmed by visual-tactile, or radiographically extending into the middle/inner dentine third) should be treated invasively/restoratively. Non-cavitated lesions may be successfully arrested using non-invasive measures in low-risk individuals or if radiographically confined to the enamel. In high-risk individuals or if radiographically extended into dentine, for these lesions, additional micro-invasive (lesion sealing and infiltration) treatment should be considered. For restoring proximal lesions, adhesive direct restorations allow minimally invasive, tooth-preserving preparations. Amalgams come with a lower risk of secondary lesions and may be preferable in more clinically complex scenarios, dependent on specific national guidelines. In structurally compromised (especially endodontically treated) teeth, indirect cuspal coverage restorations may be indicated. Detection methods for secondary lesions should be tailored according to the individual’s caries risk. Avoiding false positive detection and over-treatment is a priority. Bitewing radiographs should be combined with visual-tactile assessment to confirm secondary caries detections. Review/refurbishing/resealing/repairing instead of replacing partially defective restorations should be considered for managing secondary caries, if possible. Conclusions: An individualized and lesion-specific approach is recommended for intervening in the caries process in ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Orca King's College, London: Research Portal Clinical Oral Investigations 24 9 3315 3321 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
King's College, London: Research Portal |
op_collection_id |
ftkingscollondon |
language |
English |
topic |
Caries Consensus Decision-making Fluoride Infiltration Recommendations Restorations Sealing |
spellingShingle |
Caries Consensus Decision-making Fluoride Infiltration Recommendations Restorations Sealing Schwendicke, Falk Splieth, Christian H. Bottenberg, Peter Breschi, Lorenzo Campus, Guglielmo Doméjean, Sophie Ekstrand, Kim Giacaman, Rodrigo A. Haak, Rainer Hannig, Matthias Hickel, Reinhard Juric, Hrvoje Lussi, Adrian Machiulskiene, Vita Manton, David Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita Opdam, Niek Paris, Sebastian Santamaria, Ruth Tassery, Hervé Zandona, Andrea Zero, Domenick Zimmer, Stefan Banerjee, Avijit How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
topic_facet |
Caries Consensus Decision-making Fluoride Infiltration Recommendations Restorations Sealing |
description |
Objectives: To provide consensus recommendations on how to intervene in the caries process in adults, specifically proximal and secondary carious lesions. Methods: Based on two systematic reviews, a consensus conference and followed by an e-Delphi consensus process were held with EFCD/ORCA/DGZ delegates. Results: Managing an individual’s caries risk using non-invasive means (oral hygiene measures including flossing/interdental brushes, fluoride application) is recommended, as both proximal and secondary carious lesions may be prevented or their activity reduced. For proximal lesions, only cavitated lesions (confirmed by visual-tactile, or radiographically extending into the middle/inner dentine third) should be treated invasively/restoratively. Non-cavitated lesions may be successfully arrested using non-invasive measures in low-risk individuals or if radiographically confined to the enamel. In high-risk individuals or if radiographically extended into dentine, for these lesions, additional micro-invasive (lesion sealing and infiltration) treatment should be considered. For restoring proximal lesions, adhesive direct restorations allow minimally invasive, tooth-preserving preparations. Amalgams come with a lower risk of secondary lesions and may be preferable in more clinically complex scenarios, dependent on specific national guidelines. In structurally compromised (especially endodontically treated) teeth, indirect cuspal coverage restorations may be indicated. Detection methods for secondary lesions should be tailored according to the individual’s caries risk. Avoiding false positive detection and over-treatment is a priority. Bitewing radiographs should be combined with visual-tactile assessment to confirm secondary caries detections. Review/refurbishing/resealing/repairing instead of replacing partially defective restorations should be considered for managing secondary caries, if possible. Conclusions: An individualized and lesion-specific approach is recommended for intervening in the caries process in ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Schwendicke, Falk Splieth, Christian H. Bottenberg, Peter Breschi, Lorenzo Campus, Guglielmo Doméjean, Sophie Ekstrand, Kim Giacaman, Rodrigo A. Haak, Rainer Hannig, Matthias Hickel, Reinhard Juric, Hrvoje Lussi, Adrian Machiulskiene, Vita Manton, David Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita Opdam, Niek Paris, Sebastian Santamaria, Ruth Tassery, Hervé Zandona, Andrea Zero, Domenick Zimmer, Stefan Banerjee, Avijit |
author_facet |
Schwendicke, Falk Splieth, Christian H. Bottenberg, Peter Breschi, Lorenzo Campus, Guglielmo Doméjean, Sophie Ekstrand, Kim Giacaman, Rodrigo A. Haak, Rainer Hannig, Matthias Hickel, Reinhard Juric, Hrvoje Lussi, Adrian Machiulskiene, Vita Manton, David Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita Opdam, Niek Paris, Sebastian Santamaria, Ruth Tassery, Hervé Zandona, Andrea Zero, Domenick Zimmer, Stefan Banerjee, Avijit |
author_sort |
Schwendicke, Falk |
title |
How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
title_short |
How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
title_full |
How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
title_fullStr |
How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement |
title_sort |
how to intervene in the caries process in adults:proximal and secondary caries? an efcd-orca-dgz expert delphi consensus statement |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-to-intervene-in-the-caries-process-in-adults(bb87aa98-8a39-4ce5-a598-85ddbc0534b0).html https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087672837&partnerID=8YFLogxK |
genre |
Orca |
genre_facet |
Orca |
op_source |
Schwendicke , F , Splieth , C H , Bottenberg , P , Breschi , L , Campus , G , Doméjean , S , Ekstrand , K , Giacaman , R A , Haak , R , Hannig , M , Hickel , R , Juric , H , Lussi , A , Machiulskiene , V , Manton , D , Jablonski-Momeni , A , Opdam , N , Paris , S , Santamaria , R , Tassery , H , Zandona , A , Zero , D , Zimmer , S & Banerjee , A 2020 , ' How to intervene in the caries process in adults : proximal and secondary caries? An EFCD-ORCA-DGZ expert Delphi consensus statement ' , CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS , vol. 24 , no. 9 , pp. 3315-3321 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03431-0 |
container_title |
Clinical Oral Investigations |
container_volume |
24 |
container_issue |
9 |
container_start_page |
3315 |
op_container_end_page |
3321 |
_version_ |
1766161353972645888 |