We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!

One channel video, 30 min. (2017) We are being evaluated, but who is evaluating who, and on what terms? Today universities are obliged to be transparent and comparable by the “Bologna Process”, which is great for student mobility. But who is evaluating who and on what terms? What are the qualificati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gmelin, Felix
Format: Lecture
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497356
id ftkhoslo:oai:khioda.khio.no:11250/2497356
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkhoslo:oai:khioda.khio.no:11250/2497356 2023-06-11T04:17:23+02:00 We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day! Gmelin, Felix 2017 application/octet-stream http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497356 eng eng http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497356 cristin:1562385 Lecture 2017 ftkhoslo 2023-05-10T22:43:50Z One channel video, 30 min. (2017) We are being evaluated, but who is evaluating who, and on what terms? Today universities are obliged to be transparent and comparable by the “Bologna Process”, which is great for student mobility. But who is evaluating who and on what terms? What are the qualifications of the evaluators? Why do market oriented managerial reforms loose track on educating individuals who can relate to societal questions? This project has the ambition to evaluate the evaluators. The educational reforms following the “Bologna Accords” have sought legitimation through intensive evaluation methods. This evaluation process has opened up for strong political influence over higher education by various governmental agencies. How do we as educators in the humanities and the arts deal with this? For trying out how managerial methods work within the humanities in practice I hired Mr. Rhaman K.J. Wagner, who works within the German Bad-Homburg-based department of the Kaizen Institute — a world wide enterprise mainly helping industries to improve efficiency — and presented him to six students from the Carl von Ossietzky University in Oldenburg, Germany. Staging this was a way for me to understand a true story I was told by an artist friend of mine, Markus Degerman, who experienced exactly the same scenario at the Tromsø Art Academy in Norway. The ambiguity in how the students react to this Kaizen lean management education performed by coach Mr. Wagner, and how he approaches them, to me, is the content of this event and video. And on a symbolic level: lean management method Kaizen, developed by the car manufacturer Toyota meets 1935 Nobel Peace Price winner Carl von Ossietzky within his own context. What does this mean? How would the idealist Carl von Ossietzky have reacted to these lean management strategies? Lecture Tromsø Oslo National Academy of the Arts: Open Archive Oldenburg Norway Tromsø
institution Open Polar
collection Oslo National Academy of the Arts: Open Archive
op_collection_id ftkhoslo
language English
description One channel video, 30 min. (2017) We are being evaluated, but who is evaluating who, and on what terms? Today universities are obliged to be transparent and comparable by the “Bologna Process”, which is great for student mobility. But who is evaluating who and on what terms? What are the qualifications of the evaluators? Why do market oriented managerial reforms loose track on educating individuals who can relate to societal questions? This project has the ambition to evaluate the evaluators. The educational reforms following the “Bologna Accords” have sought legitimation through intensive evaluation methods. This evaluation process has opened up for strong political influence over higher education by various governmental agencies. How do we as educators in the humanities and the arts deal with this? For trying out how managerial methods work within the humanities in practice I hired Mr. Rhaman K.J. Wagner, who works within the German Bad-Homburg-based department of the Kaizen Institute — a world wide enterprise mainly helping industries to improve efficiency — and presented him to six students from the Carl von Ossietzky University in Oldenburg, Germany. Staging this was a way for me to understand a true story I was told by an artist friend of mine, Markus Degerman, who experienced exactly the same scenario at the Tromsø Art Academy in Norway. The ambiguity in how the students react to this Kaizen lean management education performed by coach Mr. Wagner, and how he approaches them, to me, is the content of this event and video. And on a symbolic level: lean management method Kaizen, developed by the car manufacturer Toyota meets 1935 Nobel Peace Price winner Carl von Ossietzky within his own context. What does this mean? How would the idealist Carl von Ossietzky have reacted to these lean management strategies?
format Lecture
author Gmelin, Felix
spellingShingle Gmelin, Felix
We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
author_facet Gmelin, Felix
author_sort Gmelin, Felix
title We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
title_short We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
title_full We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
title_fullStr We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
title_full_unstemmed We wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
title_sort we wish you welcome to an active, inspiring and participatory day!
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497356
geographic Oldenburg
Norway
Tromsø
geographic_facet Oldenburg
Norway
Tromsø
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2497356
cristin:1562385
_version_ 1768376495564128256