Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins

The Early Jurassic separation of Antarctica from Africa plays an important role in our understanding of the dispersal of Gondwana and Pangea. Previous reconstruction models contain overlaps and gaps in the restored margins that reflect difficulties in accurately delineating the continent-ocean-bound...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Main Authors: Nguyen, LC, Hall, SA, Bird, DE, Ball, PJ
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/
https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/1/Nguyen_etal_2016_Mozambique_Antarctica.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012776
id ftkeeleuniv:oai:eprints.keele.ac.uk:6621
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkeeleuniv:oai:eprints.keele.ac.uk:6621 2023-07-30T03:57:06+02:00 Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins Nguyen, LC Hall, SA Bird, DE Ball, PJ 2016-06-23 text https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/ https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/1/Nguyen_etal_2016_Mozambique_Antarctica.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012776 en eng American Geophysical Union (AGU) https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/1/Nguyen_etal_2016_Mozambique_Antarctica.pdf Nguyen, LC, Hall, SA, Bird, DE and Ball, PJ orcid:0000-0001-5896-6447 (2016) Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121 (6). 4156 -4179. doi:10.1002/2015JB012776 GB Physical geography Article PeerReviewed 2016 ftkeeleuniv https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012776 2023-07-10T21:17:32Z The Early Jurassic separation of Antarctica from Africa plays an important role in our understanding of the dispersal of Gondwana and Pangea. Previous reconstruction models contain overlaps and gaps in the restored margins that reflect difficulties in accurately delineating the continent-ocean-boundary (COB) and determining the amount and distribution of extended continental crust. This study focuses on the evolution of the African margin adjacent to the Mozambique Basin and the conjugate Antarctic margin near the Riiser-Larsen Sea. Satellite-derived gravity data have been used to trace the orientations and landward limits of fracture zones. A 3-D gravity inversion has produced a crustal thickness model that reliably quantifies the extent and amount of stretched crust. Crustal thicknesses together with fracture zone terminations reveal COBs that are significantly closer to the African and Antarctic coasts than previously recognized. Correlation of fracture zone azimuths and identified COBs suggests Antarctica began drifting away from Africa at approximately 171 Ma in a roughly SSE direction. An areal-balancing method has been used to restore the crust to a uniform prerift thickness so as to perform a nonrigid reconstruction for both nonvolcanic and volcanic margins. Both margins reveal a trend of increasing extension from east to west. Our results suggest Africa underwent extension of 60–120 km, while Antarctic crust was stretched by 105–180 km. Various models tested to determine the direction of extension during rifting suggest that Antarctica moved away from Africa in a WNW-ESE direction during the period between 184 and 171 Ma prior to the onset of seafloor spreading. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Riiser-Larsen Sea Keele University: Keele Research Repository Antarctic Riiser-Larsen ENVELOPE(50.667,50.667,-66.783,-66.783) Riiser-Larsen Sea ENVELOPE(24.000,24.000,-68.000,-68.000) Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 121 6 4156 4179
institution Open Polar
collection Keele University: Keele Research Repository
op_collection_id ftkeeleuniv
language English
topic GB Physical geography
spellingShingle GB Physical geography
Nguyen, LC
Hall, SA
Bird, DE
Ball, PJ
Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
topic_facet GB Physical geography
description The Early Jurassic separation of Antarctica from Africa plays an important role in our understanding of the dispersal of Gondwana and Pangea. Previous reconstruction models contain overlaps and gaps in the restored margins that reflect difficulties in accurately delineating the continent-ocean-boundary (COB) and determining the amount and distribution of extended continental crust. This study focuses on the evolution of the African margin adjacent to the Mozambique Basin and the conjugate Antarctic margin near the Riiser-Larsen Sea. Satellite-derived gravity data have been used to trace the orientations and landward limits of fracture zones. A 3-D gravity inversion has produced a crustal thickness model that reliably quantifies the extent and amount of stretched crust. Crustal thicknesses together with fracture zone terminations reveal COBs that are significantly closer to the African and Antarctic coasts than previously recognized. Correlation of fracture zone azimuths and identified COBs suggests Antarctica began drifting away from Africa at approximately 171 Ma in a roughly SSE direction. An areal-balancing method has been used to restore the crust to a uniform prerift thickness so as to perform a nonrigid reconstruction for both nonvolcanic and volcanic margins. Both margins reveal a trend of increasing extension from east to west. Our results suggest Africa underwent extension of 60–120 km, while Antarctic crust was stretched by 105–180 km. Various models tested to determine the direction of extension during rifting suggest that Antarctica moved away from Africa in a WNW-ESE direction during the period between 184 and 171 Ma prior to the onset of seafloor spreading.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nguyen, LC
Hall, SA
Bird, DE
Ball, PJ
author_facet Nguyen, LC
Hall, SA
Bird, DE
Ball, PJ
author_sort Nguyen, LC
title Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
title_short Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
title_full Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
title_fullStr Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins
title_sort reconstruction of the east africa and antarctica continental margins
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2016
url https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/
https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/1/Nguyen_etal_2016_Mozambique_Antarctica.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012776
long_lat ENVELOPE(50.667,50.667,-66.783,-66.783)
ENVELOPE(24.000,24.000,-68.000,-68.000)
geographic Antarctic
Riiser-Larsen
Riiser-Larsen Sea
geographic_facet Antarctic
Riiser-Larsen
Riiser-Larsen Sea
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Riiser-Larsen Sea
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Riiser-Larsen Sea
op_relation https://eprints.keele.ac.uk/id/eprint/6621/1/Nguyen_etal_2016_Mozambique_Antarctica.pdf
Nguyen, LC, Hall, SA, Bird, DE and Ball, PJ orcid:0000-0001-5896-6447 (2016) Reconstruction of the East Africa and Antarctica continental margins. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121 (6). 4156 -4179.
doi:10.1002/2015JB012776
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012776
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
container_volume 121
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4156
op_container_end_page 4179
_version_ 1772815875076784128