Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis

Drawing on insights from Critical Geopolitics and the science studies of Bruno Latour, this article argues that geopolitics in the Arctic today is not only a question of interstate competition but also a struggle about how to define space. If we challenge the notion of geography as being something g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politik
Main Author: Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Danish
Published: Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474
https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474
id ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/27474
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/27474 2023-05-15T14:50:57+02:00 Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis Strandsbjerg, Jeppe 2011-04-11 application/pdf https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474 https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474 dan dan Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474/24197 https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474 doi:10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474 Ophavsret (c) 2016 Forfatteren og Tidsskriftet Politik har sammen rettighederne til materiale publiceret i Politik Politik; Årg. 14 Nr. 1 (2011): Politik Politik; Vol 14 No 1 (2011): Politik 2446-0893 1604-0058 Arktis suverænitet styring geopolitik info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2011 ftkbcopenhojs https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474 2020-07-18T23:24:21Z Drawing on insights from Critical Geopolitics and the science studies of Bruno Latour, this article argues that geopolitics in the Arctic today is not only a question of interstate competition but also a struggle about how to define space. If we challenge the notion of geography as being something given or natural, geographical space itself becomes a contested phenomenon. With such a perspective, it appears that there is a more profound geopolitical struggle taking place between indigenous people, represented in this article by the Inuit Circumpolar Council, and states, than there is between states. I introduce the term ‘cartopolitics’ to describe the way in which cartography and measurement establish a particular spatial reality that is necessary for international law to function in relation to sovereignty claims made by Arctic states. In contrast to this scientific rationality of space, the Inuit have laid claim to a different spatiality characterized by shared use and movement across ice. By implication we must recognise this contest over spatiality as a geopolitical struggle that is as important for life in the Arctic as the one that takes place between states only. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arktis Arktis* inuit Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark) Arctic Politik 14 1
institution Open Polar
collection Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark)
op_collection_id ftkbcopenhojs
language Danish
topic Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
spellingShingle Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
topic_facet Arktis
suverænitet
styring
geopolitik
description Drawing on insights from Critical Geopolitics and the science studies of Bruno Latour, this article argues that geopolitics in the Arctic today is not only a question of interstate competition but also a struggle about how to define space. If we challenge the notion of geography as being something given or natural, geographical space itself becomes a contested phenomenon. With such a perspective, it appears that there is a more profound geopolitical struggle taking place between indigenous people, represented in this article by the Inuit Circumpolar Council, and states, than there is between states. I introduce the term ‘cartopolitics’ to describe the way in which cartography and measurement establish a particular spatial reality that is necessary for international law to function in relation to sovereignty claims made by Arctic states. In contrast to this scientific rationality of space, the Inuit have laid claim to a different spatiality characterized by shared use and movement across ice. By implication we must recognise this contest over spatiality as a geopolitical struggle that is as important for life in the Arctic as the one that takes place between states only.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
author_facet Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
author_sort Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
title Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
title_short Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
title_full Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
title_fullStr Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
title_full_unstemmed Geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i Arktis
title_sort geopolitik, naturlige grænser og „kartopolitik“ i arktis
publisher Institut for Statskundskab, Københavns Universitet
publishDate 2011
url https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474
https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
inuit
genre_facet Arctic
Arktis
Arktis*
inuit
op_source Politik; Årg. 14 Nr. 1 (2011): Politik
Politik; Vol 14 No 1 (2011): Politik
2446-0893
1604-0058
op_relation https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474/24197
https://tidsskrift.dk/politik/article/view/27474
doi:10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474
op_rights Ophavsret (c) 2016 Forfatteren og Tidsskriftet Politik har sammen rettighederne til materiale publiceret i Politik
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7146/politik.v14i1.27474
container_title Politik
container_volume 14
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766322001304092672