Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid?
On the Question of Reindeer in Scotland in postglacial times An enigmatic reference in the Orkneyinga saga (Chapter 102) which refers to the events of the year 1159 expressly states that "the Earls (of Orkney) used to go over to Caithness every summer, hunting red deer and reindeer in the woods...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab
1989
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940 |
id |
ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/110940 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark) |
op_collection_id |
ftkbcopenhojs |
language |
Danish |
topic |
Ren skotland vikingetid Reindeer Scotland Viking age |
spellingShingle |
Ren skotland vikingetid Reindeer Scotland Viking age Rausing, Gad Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
topic_facet |
Ren skotland vikingetid Reindeer Scotland Viking age |
description |
On the Question of Reindeer in Scotland in postglacial times An enigmatic reference in the Orkneyinga saga (Chapter 102) which refers to the events of the year 1159 expressly states that "the Earls (of Orkney) used to go over to Caithness every summer, hunting red deer and reindeer in the woods there". This has been taken to prove that reindeer survived in Scotland well into historical times, no matter how unlikely it seems. But is this possible? Is the statement correct? A survey by Lawson (1984) has shown that reindeer remains have been found in at least 18 different sites in Scotland: two separate sites on Rousay in the Orkneys, in brochs at Keiss and at Yarhouse in Caithness, in the Creag nan Uamh caves and in the Cill-Trolla Broch, both in Sutherland, at Tain in Ross and Cromathy, at Marlee in Fife, at Croftamie in Dumbartonshire, at Jordanhill, at Queen's Park and at Raesgill, all in Lanarkshire, at Kilmaurs and at Tarbolton in Ayrshire, at Craigton in West Lothian, at Green Craig in Mid-Lothian, at Middlestots in Berwickshire and at Shaw in Dumfriesshire. Most, if not all, of these finds are late-glacial, although some, having been found under Devensian till, must antedate that glaciation. (Kilmaur, Queen's Park, Raesgill.) The antler from Croftamie was found in blue marine clay overlain by till deposited by ice that had issued from the valley presently containing Loch Lomond, and should thus be lateglacial, and the material found in the reindeer cave on the Creag nan Uamh has been radiocarbon dated to 10080 +- 70 B.P. and 8300 +- 90 B.P. respectively. However, both the antlers found on Rousay lay in early-postglacial peat, as did those found at Shaw and at Middlestots, and the bone from Creag nan Uamh dating from 8300 B.P. is also clearly postglacial. Evidently even the youngest finds which can be dated by their geological context belong in the early postglacial period. But are there any finds of reindeer remains which might indicate that reindeer survived in Scotland until an even later period? The finds from the brochs may, or may not, date from the time of the human occupation of the brochs, at the beginning of the present millenium. Even if they date from the time when the brochs were occupied they prove nothing since they may be, and most likely are, the remains of antlers imported from Norway to serve as raw materials for the manufacture of combs. But what about the statement in the Orkneyinga Saga? We must now take the background of the Saga into account. The Orkneyinga Saga was not "written" by an Orkneyman but consists of a compilation of Orkney tales and poems, edited by an Icelander, in Icelandic, sometime around 1200 A.D. The statement that the Orkney earls "hunted red deer and reindeer in the woods of Caithness" was thus not written down in Norse but in Icelandic. It may have been a semantic mistake by either an Orkney bard or the Icelandic editor, if so almost certainly by the latter. How did it happen? The Icelandic scribe was undoubtedly more familiar with Norwegian than with any other European language. He would thus probably have used the Norwegian word for an animal which did not occur in Iceland, and for which Icelandic had no term, but which was familiar to every Norwegian, the old Norse word for reindeer, "hran". But neither are there, or were there ever, any roedeer in Iceland nor were there, at the time, any in Norway, so the scribe would almost certainly not have heard the old Norse word for this animal. When he heard the old English word for roedeer, "rah", plural "rahn", he simply understood it to refer to an animal familiar to him from Norway and from Norwegian literature, reindeer. (Ekwall, p. 82). The conclusion must be that the Orkney Earls went to Caithness to hunt red deer and "rahn", roedeer, not "hran", reindeer. NOTE There was evidently no word for "reindeer" in Old English. In Othere's account the term "wildrum" is used for "wild deer" and "tamra deora" (ack.pl.) for "tame deer", with a Norwegian word to specify which kind of deer these were: "tha deor hi hatad hranas", i.e. "these deer they call reindeer". Gad Rausing London |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Rausing, Gad |
author_facet |
Rausing, Gad |
author_sort |
Rausing, Gad |
title |
Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
title_short |
Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
title_full |
Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
title_fullStr |
Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? |
title_sort |
fanns ren i skottland under vikingatid? |
publisher |
Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab |
publishDate |
1989 |
url |
https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(168.467,168.467,-77.500,-77.500) ENVELOPE(-79.150,-79.150,-73.483,-73.483) ENVELOPE(-125.746,-125.746,54.239,54.239) ENVELOPE(-22.333,-22.333,74.117,74.117) |
geographic |
Norway Sutherland Combs Loch Lomond Jordanhill |
geographic_facet |
Norway Sutherland Combs Loch Lomond Jordanhill |
genre |
Iceland ren |
genre_facet |
Iceland ren |
op_source |
Kuml; Årg. 36 Nr. 36 (1989): Kuml 1988-89; 359-363 Kuml; Vol 36 No 36 (1989): Kuml 1988-89; 359-363 2446-3280 0454-6245 |
op_relation |
https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940/160068 https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940 |
_version_ |
1766043460739006464 |
spelling |
ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/110940 2023-05-15T16:52:57+02:00 Fanns ren i Skottland under vikingatid? On the question of Reindeer in Scotland in postglacial times Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab Rausing, Gad 1989-11-20 application/pdf https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940 dan dan Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940/160068 https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/110940 Kuml; Årg. 36 Nr. 36 (1989): Kuml 1988-89; 359-363 Kuml; Vol 36 No 36 (1989): Kuml 1988-89; 359-363 2446-3280 0454-6245 Ren skotland vikingetid Reindeer Scotland Viking age info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1989 ftkbcopenhojs 2020-07-18T22:51:33Z On the Question of Reindeer in Scotland in postglacial times An enigmatic reference in the Orkneyinga saga (Chapter 102) which refers to the events of the year 1159 expressly states that "the Earls (of Orkney) used to go over to Caithness every summer, hunting red deer and reindeer in the woods there". This has been taken to prove that reindeer survived in Scotland well into historical times, no matter how unlikely it seems. But is this possible? Is the statement correct? A survey by Lawson (1984) has shown that reindeer remains have been found in at least 18 different sites in Scotland: two separate sites on Rousay in the Orkneys, in brochs at Keiss and at Yarhouse in Caithness, in the Creag nan Uamh caves and in the Cill-Trolla Broch, both in Sutherland, at Tain in Ross and Cromathy, at Marlee in Fife, at Croftamie in Dumbartonshire, at Jordanhill, at Queen's Park and at Raesgill, all in Lanarkshire, at Kilmaurs and at Tarbolton in Ayrshire, at Craigton in West Lothian, at Green Craig in Mid-Lothian, at Middlestots in Berwickshire and at Shaw in Dumfriesshire. Most, if not all, of these finds are late-glacial, although some, having been found under Devensian till, must antedate that glaciation. (Kilmaur, Queen's Park, Raesgill.) The antler from Croftamie was found in blue marine clay overlain by till deposited by ice that had issued from the valley presently containing Loch Lomond, and should thus be lateglacial, and the material found in the reindeer cave on the Creag nan Uamh has been radiocarbon dated to 10080 +- 70 B.P. and 8300 +- 90 B.P. respectively. However, both the antlers found on Rousay lay in early-postglacial peat, as did those found at Shaw and at Middlestots, and the bone from Creag nan Uamh dating from 8300 B.P. is also clearly postglacial. Evidently even the youngest finds which can be dated by their geological context belong in the early postglacial period. But are there any finds of reindeer remains which might indicate that reindeer survived in Scotland until an even later period? The finds from the brochs may, or may not, date from the time of the human occupation of the brochs, at the beginning of the present millenium. Even if they date from the time when the brochs were occupied they prove nothing since they may be, and most likely are, the remains of antlers imported from Norway to serve as raw materials for the manufacture of combs. But what about the statement in the Orkneyinga Saga? We must now take the background of the Saga into account. The Orkneyinga Saga was not "written" by an Orkneyman but consists of a compilation of Orkney tales and poems, edited by an Icelander, in Icelandic, sometime around 1200 A.D. The statement that the Orkney earls "hunted red deer and reindeer in the woods of Caithness" was thus not written down in Norse but in Icelandic. It may have been a semantic mistake by either an Orkney bard or the Icelandic editor, if so almost certainly by the latter. How did it happen? The Icelandic scribe was undoubtedly more familiar with Norwegian than with any other European language. He would thus probably have used the Norwegian word for an animal which did not occur in Iceland, and for which Icelandic had no term, but which was familiar to every Norwegian, the old Norse word for reindeer, "hran". But neither are there, or were there ever, any roedeer in Iceland nor were there, at the time, any in Norway, so the scribe would almost certainly not have heard the old Norse word for this animal. When he heard the old English word for roedeer, "rah", plural "rahn", he simply understood it to refer to an animal familiar to him from Norway and from Norwegian literature, reindeer. (Ekwall, p. 82). The conclusion must be that the Orkney Earls went to Caithness to hunt red deer and "rahn", roedeer, not "hran", reindeer. NOTE There was evidently no word for "reindeer" in Old English. In Othere's account the term "wildrum" is used for "wild deer" and "tamra deora" (ack.pl.) for "tame deer", with a Norwegian word to specify which kind of deer these were: "tha deor hi hatad hranas", i.e. "these deer they call reindeer". Gad Rausing London Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland ren Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark) Norway Sutherland ENVELOPE(168.467,168.467,-77.500,-77.500) Combs ENVELOPE(-79.150,-79.150,-73.483,-73.483) Loch Lomond ENVELOPE(-125.746,-125.746,54.239,54.239) Jordanhill ENVELOPE(-22.333,-22.333,74.117,74.117) |