Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep

On concept of culture in archaeology The article is mainly dealing with the concept of culture which has been used and misused in Scandinavian archaeology. Based on a few and often arbitrary selected elements one has constructed »archaeological cultures«,, extensive both in time and space. Thus it i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hagen, Anders
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Danish
Published: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab 1970
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432
id ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/105432
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkbcopenhojs:oai:ojs.tidsskrift.dk:article/105432 2023-05-15T17:05:12+02:00 Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep Hagen, Anders 1970-04-24 application/pdf https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432 dan dan Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432/154236 https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432 Kuml; Årg. 20 Nr. 20 (1970); 267-278 Kuml; Vol 20 No 20 (1970); 267-278 2446-3280 0454-6245 culture in archaeology kulturbegrebet indenfor arkæologi arkæologiens kulturbegrep concept of culture in archaeology critique kritik skandinavisk arkæologi Scandinavian archaeology info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 1970 ftkbcopenhojs 2020-07-18T22:50:07Z On concept of culture in archaeology The article is mainly dealing with the concept of culture which has been used and misused in Scandinavian archaeology. Based on a few and often arbitrary selected elements one has constructed »archaeological cultures«,, extensive both in time and space. Thus it is questionable if »macrocomplexes« like the »Komsa culture« in Northern Norway and the »Battleaxe culture« on the Continent have been cultures in the real sense, at least if we with the concept »culture« mean something more than a grouping of material traits. It seems therefore to be of importance for the archaeologists -also in Scandinavia- in a greater extent than is usual, to learn from ethnology/cultural anthropology, if we wish to discuss culture and not only products of culture.If we want to get away from the »cultural straitjacket«, which Scandinavian archaeology gradually has put itself into, the article recommends the use of unit concepts like »phase«, »horizon«, »tradition« (Willey and Phillips), and »technocomplexes« (D. L. Clarke). If we succeed in grouping and explaining our archaeological data in the way these concepts allow, it seems to be possible to »clear away« several of the more doubtful »cultures«, which archaeologists the last 100 years have created.After all maybe there have never existed a »Komsa culture«, a »Battleaxe culture«, or a »Pitted-ware culture«.Anders Hagen Article in Journal/Newspaper Komsa culture Northern Norway Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark) Norway Hagen ENVELOPE(6.545,6.545,62.545,62.545) Komsa ENVELOPE(24.278,24.278,65.749,65.749)
institution Open Polar
collection Tidsskrift.dk (The Royal Library, Denmark)
op_collection_id ftkbcopenhojs
language Danish
topic culture in archaeology
kulturbegrebet indenfor arkæologi
arkæologiens kulturbegrep
concept of culture in archaeology
critique
kritik
skandinavisk arkæologi
Scandinavian archaeology
spellingShingle culture in archaeology
kulturbegrebet indenfor arkæologi
arkæologiens kulturbegrep
concept of culture in archaeology
critique
kritik
skandinavisk arkæologi
Scandinavian archaeology
Hagen, Anders
Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
topic_facet culture in archaeology
kulturbegrebet indenfor arkæologi
arkæologiens kulturbegrep
concept of culture in archaeology
critique
kritik
skandinavisk arkæologi
Scandinavian archaeology
description On concept of culture in archaeology The article is mainly dealing with the concept of culture which has been used and misused in Scandinavian archaeology. Based on a few and often arbitrary selected elements one has constructed »archaeological cultures«,, extensive both in time and space. Thus it is questionable if »macrocomplexes« like the »Komsa culture« in Northern Norway and the »Battleaxe culture« on the Continent have been cultures in the real sense, at least if we with the concept »culture« mean something more than a grouping of material traits. It seems therefore to be of importance for the archaeologists -also in Scandinavia- in a greater extent than is usual, to learn from ethnology/cultural anthropology, if we wish to discuss culture and not only products of culture.If we want to get away from the »cultural straitjacket«, which Scandinavian archaeology gradually has put itself into, the article recommends the use of unit concepts like »phase«, »horizon«, »tradition« (Willey and Phillips), and »technocomplexes« (D. L. Clarke). If we succeed in grouping and explaining our archaeological data in the way these concepts allow, it seems to be possible to »clear away« several of the more doubtful »cultures«, which archaeologists the last 100 years have created.After all maybe there have never existed a »Komsa culture«, a »Battleaxe culture«, or a »Pitted-ware culture«.Anders Hagen
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hagen, Anders
author_facet Hagen, Anders
author_sort Hagen, Anders
title Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
title_short Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
title_full Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
title_fullStr Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
title_full_unstemmed Om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
title_sort om arkeologiens kulturbegrep
publisher Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab
publishDate 1970
url https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432
long_lat ENVELOPE(6.545,6.545,62.545,62.545)
ENVELOPE(24.278,24.278,65.749,65.749)
geographic Norway
Hagen
Komsa
geographic_facet Norway
Hagen
Komsa
genre Komsa culture
Northern Norway
genre_facet Komsa culture
Northern Norway
op_source Kuml; Årg. 20 Nr. 20 (1970); 267-278
Kuml; Vol 20 No 20 (1970); 267-278
2446-3280
0454-6245
op_relation https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432/154236
https://tidsskrift.dk/kuml/article/view/105432
_version_ 1766059608921604096