The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it

Introduction: In today’s society, the access to and use of everyday technology (ET), such as cell phones and Internet-based services, can be claimed as conditions for participation in many tasks in everyday life. This study aims to determine and compare levels of perceived access to and perceived di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Main Authors: Malinowsky, Camilla, Larsson Lund, Maria
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10616/45010
id ftkarolinskainst:oai:openarchive.ki.se:10616/45010
record_format openpolar
spelling ftkarolinskainst:oai:openarchive.ki.se:10616/45010 2023-12-31T10:09:08+01:00 The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it Malinowsky, Camilla Larsson Lund, Maria 2016-01-21 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10616/45010 eng eng Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society British Journal of Occupational Therapy info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/0308022614563943 0308-0226 http://hdl.handle.net/10616/45010 Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. info:eu-repo/semantics/article art acceptedVersion 2016 ftkarolinskainst https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022614563943 2023-12-06T23:37:08Z Introduction: In today’s society, the access to and use of everyday technology (ET), such as cell phones and Internet-based services, can be claimed as conditions for participation in many tasks in everyday life. This study aims to determine and compare levels of perceived access to and perceived difficulties in the use of common ETs in the public space among people with acquired brain injury (ABI) compared with controls. Methods: The perceived access to and difficulty in the use of 14 ETs were investigated in a sample with ABI (n=59, returned to work (RTW, n=28)/not returned to work (NRTW, n =31) and matched controls (n=52) using the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire. Findings: Perceived access to the ETs was generally high. The potential to use each of the ETs independently or with minor difficulties significantly differed between controls and persons with ABI in eight of the fourteen ETs. Particularly, difficulties were found among those with ABI-NRTW. Conclusion: People with ABI perceive access to ETs commonly used in public space, but the ET difficulty is not always satisfactory matched to their ability to use ET. To enable participation in society, it is important to consider both the accessibility and usability of ET. Luleå University of Technology Promobilia Foundation Strategic Research Health Care Programme of Umeå University Accepted Article in Journal/Newspaper Luleå Luleå Luleå Karolinska Institutet: Publications British Journal of Occupational Therapy 79 1 26 34
institution Open Polar
collection Karolinska Institutet: Publications
op_collection_id ftkarolinskainst
language English
description Introduction: In today’s society, the access to and use of everyday technology (ET), such as cell phones and Internet-based services, can be claimed as conditions for participation in many tasks in everyday life. This study aims to determine and compare levels of perceived access to and perceived difficulties in the use of common ETs in the public space among people with acquired brain injury (ABI) compared with controls. Methods: The perceived access to and difficulty in the use of 14 ETs were investigated in a sample with ABI (n=59, returned to work (RTW, n=28)/not returned to work (NRTW, n =31) and matched controls (n=52) using the Everyday Technology Use Questionnaire. Findings: Perceived access to the ETs was generally high. The potential to use each of the ETs independently or with minor difficulties significantly differed between controls and persons with ABI in eight of the fourteen ETs. Particularly, difficulties were found among those with ABI-NRTW. Conclusion: People with ABI perceive access to ETs commonly used in public space, but the ET difficulty is not always satisfactory matched to their ability to use ET. To enable participation in society, it is important to consider both the accessibility and usability of ET. Luleå University of Technology Promobilia Foundation Strategic Research Health Care Programme of Umeå University Accepted
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
spellingShingle Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
author_facet Malinowsky, Camilla
Larsson Lund, Maria
author_sort Malinowsky, Camilla
title The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
title_short The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
title_full The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
title_fullStr The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
title_full_unstemmed The match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with ABI to use it
title_sort match between everyday technology in public space and the ability of working-aged people with abi to use it
publisher Inst för neurobiologi, vårdvetenskap och samhälle / Dept of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10616/45010
genre Luleå
Luleå
Luleå
genre_facet Luleå
Luleå
Luleå
op_relation British Journal of Occupational Therapy
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1177/0308022614563943
0308-0226
http://hdl.handle.net/10616/45010
op_rights Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022614563943
container_title British Journal of Occupational Therapy
container_volume 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
op_container_end_page 34
_version_ 1786842136997527552